Muffy wrote:Y'know, if we put up the most recent sleep architecture, grossly there seems to be some good improvement compared to the 2 immediately prior:
Yep, I can see that when you place the individual graphs atop one another like that. It's easier to compare. That's good news.
However, a sleep efficiency of 82% is fair at best (really need at least 85%, 90% is desirable, 95% would be excellent) and 31 awakenings is poor (you should have like "2").
Is there something I can do to improve that? And if not, what does that mean for my future treatment needs?
In re: the question about lower pressure effectiveness, they're all good. The start there seemed aggressive, but it appears they were attacking snores. Interestingly, that was the subject at the end of the Big Discussion (addressing the snores at low pressures).
At this point, there's really no justification for ASV whatsoever. This, too, is in keeping with the concept that time may allow for acclimatization of pressure, resetting apnea threshold and allowing centrals to resolve on their own.
Well, I sure am happy to know that something is working in my favor.
As you see, they're harping on the sleep hygiene thing, too.
I don't know what's wrong with my sleep hygiene. I'm usually in bed between 10:30 and 11:30, and I'm asleep within ten minutes. I'm usually awake anywhere between 4:30 and 5:30 a.m. It's just not enough time. I slept for a longer period of time at my sleep study than I have in a very long while at home. I didn't feel much different the next morning, though, I'm guessing because the tech woke me a few times during the night for the mouth leaks.
Taking levothyroxin at night can generate insomnia, but that would have been too easy.
Overall, I think there's a lot of positive stuff here.
Muffy
I've never had issues with insomnia <knock on wood>. No trouble getting to sleep, no trouble staying asleep or getting back to sleep when I have to make a bathroom trip in the middle of the night. I just wake up too early and don't feel rested during the day. I'm still having to nap far too often, which I do early enough in the day that it doesn't interfere with me going to sleep that night. I do nap with la machine; just don't want to feel the need to do it at all.
So, all things considered, what would you advise as my xPAP treatment from here on? If the centrals seem to be resolving themselves and ASV no longer appears to be a necessity, my own plan would be to get myself an APAP with software and reader, set it at a narrow range (maybe 8-12?) to see how I fare at the lower pressures, and then tweak things from there. Is that reasonable, in your opinion? And if not, what do you suggest?
Thanks, Muffin. Your help is always appreciated.