Spoke with my Doctor

General Discussion on any topic relating to CPAP and/or Sleep Apnea.
User avatar
robertmarilyn
Posts: 523
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:38 pm

Re: Spoke with my Doctor

Post by robertmarilyn » Fri May 29, 2009 9:30 am

BleepingBeauty wrote:I consider myself lucky, compared to good people like you and mar, who've had so much more to deal with physically than I have. You guys are real troopers, and I admire and salute you for your perseverance.
(((Hugs)))...all of you here have been a big help to me and I appreciate the part you have played in helping me to learn. Have a very Happy Birthday BB!
mar

User avatar
BleepingBeauty
Posts: 2454
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Aridzona ;-)

Re: Spoke with my Doctor

Post by BleepingBeauty » Fri May 29, 2009 9:30 am

2flamingos wrote:BB- Sorry to hear about your disappointment after having been sooo optimistic after your first meeting with the new doc. But I have to say, sounda like you are taking everything in stride, and then taking control - not that I would expect anything less from you! Give 'em hell honey!

If I don;t get to chat with you on your b'day - have a happy one! I think you know what by birthday wish for you is. lol

2
Thanks, 2. Yep, I'm holding on to my optimism but am prepared to take matters into my own hands, if need be. Thanks for the vote of confidence!

And thanks to all of you for the happy b-day wishes! I feel like I've found a wonderful new family in this forum, and it's comforting and heartwarming to feel like a part of it all. Living as far away from my family as I do, this place now feels like my home-away-from-home. I'm grateful for all of the support to be found here. It means a lot. <--good tears!

Maybe I'll treat myself with TWO birthday gifts this year ("To me, From me, With love and kisses, Me"). One, a data-capable autopap with software and card reader. And two, a lil sumpin-sumpin from the site mentioned in chat recently. Woohoo! Partaaaaaay!
Veni, vidi, Velcro. I came, I saw, I stuck around.

Dx 11/07: AHI 107, central apnea, Cheyne Stokes respiration, moderate-severe O2 desats. (Simple OSA would be too easy. ;))

PR S1 ASV 950, DreamWear mask, F&P 150 humidifier, O2 @ 2L.

User avatar
Catnap
Posts: 321
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:20 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: Spoke with my Doctor

Post by Catnap » Fri May 29, 2009 4:14 pm

Just wanted to chime in on the birthday wishes -- hope it's the beginning of your best year ever!!

And also on the Rx information, just thought I'd mention that I was able to buy my new machine with my old Rx. I just called the doctor, they mailed me a copy, and I faxed it in for online use. If you're thinking about buying from cpap.com or cpapauction.com (and especially the latter, since timing can be important if you're bidding), it's worthwhile to go ahead and get your prescription on file with them now.

Now back to our previously scheduled birthday

_________________
Mask: TAP PAP Nasal Pillow CPAP Mask with Improved Stability Mouthpiece
Additional Comments: S8 Elite II, TAP PAP, HumidAireH4i Heated Humidifier

-SWS
Posts: 5301
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:06 pm

Re: Spoke with my Doctor

Post by -SWS » Fri May 29, 2009 6:20 pm

BleepingBeauty wrote:I feel like I've found a wonderful new family in this forum, and it's comforting and heartwarming to feel like a part of it all. Living as far away from my family as I do, this place now feels like my home-away-from-home.
Glad you found our safe refuge, BB.

Good birthday hopes and vibes coming from me as well!

I'll save the questions, comments, and thoughts about your sleep study for another day. I have plenty.

User avatar
OutaSync
Posts: 2048
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 8:49 am
Location: Virginia

Re: Spoke with my Doctor

Post by OutaSync » Fri May 29, 2009 8:16 pm

BB,

I know that you are disappointed that your Dr. didn't find something that had been missed before and could be easily treated. But you are not back to square one because now you have a supportive community who will help you through this. For some of us there are no easy answers. I have a lot of empathy for your situation and just wanted to send you some encouraging words and wish you a Happy Birthday, as well.

Bev
Diagnosed 9/4/07
Sleep Study Titrated to 19 cm H2O
Rotating between Activa and Softgel
11/2/07 RemStar M Series Auto with AFlex 14-17
10/17/08 BiPAP Auto SV 13/13-23, BPM Auto, AHI avg <1

User avatar
DoriC
Posts: 5214
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 9:28 pm
Location: NJ

Re: Spoke with my Doctor

Post by DoriC » Fri May 29, 2009 9:49 pm

BleepingBeauty wrote:

and we'll see how I'm doing at 12cm. (Eighteen months in, and I'm coming full-circle, back to my original pressure; since that didn't seem to work very well for me for the first year of therapy, I don't know how or why it might work for me now. *sigh*)

she said she thinks patients rely too heavily on the data from their machines.
I've been wanting to ask this question. Is it possible that after doing all the tweaking ,adjustments,less anxiety and finally just getting into the cpap routine, one's pressure needs might be less?

At our first followup visit with the Dr, and after joining this forum, I brought the reports and told him I had made changes to his original settings (8-18). After he pored over the results as if he had never seen one before, he gave me a high 5 and told us to keep up the good work and no additional input, and come back in 3 months. Never did make another appt.

_________________
Mask: Mirage Quattro™ Full Face CPAP Mask with Headgear
Additional Comments: 14/8.4,PS=4, UMFF, 02@2L,
"Do or Do Not-There Is No Try"-"Yoda"
"We are what we repeatedly do,so excellence
is not an act but a habit"-"Aristotle"
DEAR HUBBY BEGAN CPAP 9/2/08

User avatar
BleepingBeauty
Posts: 2454
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Aridzona ;-)

Re: Spoke with my Doctor

Post by BleepingBeauty » Fri May 29, 2009 10:35 pm

Catnap wrote:Just wanted to chime in on the birthday wishes -- hope it's the beginning of your best year ever!
Thanks, Catnap! That'd be awesome!
If you're thinking about buying from cpap.com or cpapauction.com (and especially the latter, since timing can be important if you're bidding), it's worthwhile to go ahead and get your prescription on file with them now.
That's really good advice. I hadn't thought about getting my prescription on file until I was ready to purchase, but your suggestion makes very good sense (especially if I find the machine I want on the auction). Thanks!
-SWS wrote:Glad you found our safe refuge, BB.
Oh, me, too! This place is such a Godsend. I've never been on a forum like this, that offers so much to so many: A wealth of information, wonderful caring participants who so willingly offer their experience/acquired knowledge/wisdom, and the level of support offered to anyone who needs a boost, be it big or small, in their efforts to improve their therapy. I'm proud to be a part of this place.
Good birthday hopes and vibes coming from me as well!

I'll save the questions, comments, and thoughts about your sleep study for another day. I have plenty.
Thanks for the b-day wishes and good vibes!

I have a bunch of questions about my sleep study, myself, but we'll get into that after I see the doc and get a copy of it in a few weeks. I'll post about it after I've uploaded it. I'm very curious to see what it reveals.
OutaSync wrote:BB,

I know that you are disappointed that your Dr. didn't find something that had been missed before and could be easily treated. But you are not back to square one because now you have a supportive community who will help you through this. For some of us there are no easy answers. I have a lot of empathy for your situation and just wanted to send you some encouraging words and wish you a Happy Birthday, as well.

Bev
Disappointed, sure. I mean, I'm glad the doctor doesn't think I have complex sleep apnea, but it sure is frustrating to not know what the problem is or how to fix it. And now that I'm back around to my original pressure of 12, I feel like I'm running in a big circle and not getting anywhere. But I have turned off the C-Flex on my machine, and maybe that'll make a difference in how well I sleep and how I feel during the day. I'm hoping...

Thanks for the encouragement, the empathy, and the b-day wishes, Bev.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Many thanks to all! My experience here has been very, very positive, and I appreciate all of you and this site more than I can express with a keyboard. Sincerely.
Veni, vidi, Velcro. I came, I saw, I stuck around.

Dx 11/07: AHI 107, central apnea, Cheyne Stokes respiration, moderate-severe O2 desats. (Simple OSA would be too easy. ;))

PR S1 ASV 950, DreamWear mask, F&P 150 humidifier, O2 @ 2L.

User avatar
Muffy
Posts: 960
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:28 am
Location: Schenectady, New York

What Are You Fixing?

Post by Muffy » Sat May 30, 2009 4:06 am

BleepingBeauty wrote:I have a bunch of questions about my sleep study, myself, but we'll get into that after I see the doc and get a copy of it in a few weeks. I'll post about it after I've uploaded it. I'm very curious to see what it reveals.
Right. There's a lot more to "sleep" than just "AHI" and "we're going with a pressure of 12".
BleepingBeauty wrote:Disappointed, sure. I mean, I'm glad the doctor doesn't think I have complex sleep apnea..
I would respectfully, but vehemently, disagree. Looking at the total picture, including that first terrible titration on the split study:

Image

the totally unpredictable results seen the APAP download:

Image

and the second highlighted area in this study:

Image

it is very clear that there WAS CompSAS. However, as noted in
Muffy wrote:The oximetry previously presented from 11/12/08 and 3/12/09 showed a baseline that didn't look all that bad:

Image

Image

But an important observation is that now oximetry (and respiratory events) have become far more stable despite using similar pressures. I think this example shows (1) how aggressive attack is counterproductive (hey, if you got a string of centrals, chances are they ain't gonna get much better if you continue a staircase titration); and (2) simply allowing time for the body to equilibrate may solve a lot of the central problem.
A careful titration and the passage of time may have contributed to this present study, which perhaps "did not exhibit characteristics of CompSAS", and this really shouldn't be a surprise.

A think a closer look at your response to some of the lower pressures may be beneficial.

Further, I think looking at sleep architecture should be coming more to the forefront. As noted before, it seems to be getting progressively worse:

Image

It just hit me that there's no comparison to what is "good". Here's a little blurb:
somebody must've wrote:These are examples of hypnograms showing sleep architecture during a full night's sleep.

The first example represents normal sleep. Sleep progresses from wake, through light sleep (Stage 1 and 2), followed by deep sleep (Stages 3 & 4), and finally a REM period. This is called a Sleep Cycle, and takes about 90 minutes to complete. There are usually 4-6 Sleep Cycles per night. Most deep or delta sleep occurs in the first Sleep Cycle. The duration of REM periods increase as the night goes on. Normal sleep stage percentages are Stage 1 5%, Stage 2 60%, Stage 3 & 4 combined 20%, and REM 20%. Delta sleep generally decreases as a function of age.

Image

This example represents someone with OSA. After sleep onset, the patient moves back and forth from Stage 1 to Stage 2 sleep. Stage 1 sleep is simply a transition stage to quality sleep and should only appear at the begining of the night. It has virtually no value as far as restorative sleep goes. It is should not appear to any great degree once bona fide sleep begins. There is no delta sleep whatsoever. REM sleep is 19.9%. The patient is aroused to wake at least 10 times. There is some continuous stage 2 and REM sleep, but overall this is fairly poor quality sleep, with frequent disruptions caused by OSA.

Image

This example shows a patient with a large quantity of delta sleep (20.8%) and REM sleep (33.8%). Sleep is fairly continuous. This patient will be well rested in the morning. This patient is the one from example 2 during his CPAP titration. This greater than normal quantity of delta and REM sleep is termed Rebound Phenomenon. With regular use, the CPAP user will move to a more normal sleep architecture as the "sleep debt" is paid off. This usually occurs in a day or so. This also serves to explain why some people think they slept so well in the lab, but then do poorly at home. It's not that they're doing poorly, they're actually now approaching normal architecture, the aggravating factor is now gone.

Image

This example represents a Split-Night study. Initially, there is a very disrupted, light sleep pattern, that turns into prolonged REM after application of CPAP. There are areas of sustained sleep, but there are still areas of disrupted light sleep. This patient also had Periodic Limb Movements which continued to disrupt sleep even though respiratory events were well-controlled on CPAP.

Image

There should probably be about 40-50 stage shifts in a normal, healthy patient not troubled by lab effect (the test itself can drive up the stage shifts). Most references are looking at about 7 stage shifts per hour, give or take.
BTW, those were generated prior to the new standards for NREM, which now combine Stages 3 & 4.

Before you drop a bundle on an APAP and software, which algorithm are you going to get? If you use the Respironics, what are you going to do if you get a download like you got in April (IMO, those screwy numbers are from an aggressive APAP approach-- remember the "maybe sitting on 7.0 cmH2O may produce good info" thing) but what if that was artifact from sleep transition issues (although I think looking at Variable Breathing would give a clue there)?

Muffy
________________________________

Machine: Dell Dimension 8100
Mask: 3M N-95 (during flu season)
Humidifier: Avoided, tends to make me moldy
Software: XP Pro
Additional Comments: You can't find a solution when you don't know the problem

User avatar
Muffy
Posts: 960
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:28 am
Location: Schenectady, New York

Idle Thoughts...

Post by Muffy » Sat May 30, 2009 4:15 am

My biggest fear is mixing up the data from the "triplets" (SLJ, BB and mar).

As soon as RG wakes up, she's going to say "That's 105!"

There's no way they're going to send Omir Santos down now.

Hey BB, how's the diet and exercise thing going? Right now, IMO, THAT would give you the most bang for the buck.

At the annual physical, the Muffy MD said "your vitamin D is a little low". Now that's a surprise, since she gets quite a bit of "real organic VitD" every day ("weather permitting"), and shoves in 2000 IU tablets (although in a somewhat disorganized fashion) like tic tacs.

Muffy
________________________________

Machine: Dell Dimension 8100
Mask: 3M N-95 (during flu season)
Humidifier: Avoided, tends to make me moldy
Software: XP Pro
Additional Comments: You can't find a solution when you don't know the problem

User avatar
robertmarilyn
Posts: 523
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:38 pm

Re: Idle Thoughts...

Post by robertmarilyn » Sat May 30, 2009 4:46 am

Muffy wrote:My biggest fear is mixing up the data from the "triplets" (SLJ, BB and mar).

Ha ha, the problem kiddies

As soon as RG wakes up, she's going to say "That's 105!"

Grownup talk?

There's no way they're going to send Omir Santos down now.

The Mets will spend another day in first place with a large contribution from a patch-work lineup that won't sell many uniform shirts at the concession stands. It helps that their starting pitchers are providing the necessary number of innings and that important baseballs heading toward the stands have been umpire-aided. Or was it simply that the other team was the Washington Gnats and Friday night it was the floundering Marlins?
It's four in a row now, after the 2-1, 11th-inning win over Florida, their sixth in seven games since their escape from Los Angeles. Their first run, tying the game, came in the fifth inning, a home run by catcher Omir Santos on an 0-2 pitch. He isn't the unlikeliest Met to put the ball in the stands, but let's face it, they weren't expecting that kind of production when they brought him up after Brian Schneider went on the disabled list last month.
Santos flied out his next time up and popped up in the ninth. His next chance came two innings later. Gary Sheffield, who didn't put on a Met uniform until a day before the season began, led off the 11th with a single to left. David Wright, up next, struck out for the second time. He left four runners in scoring position. But this wasn't a night for the familiar stars.
With Fernando Tatis batting, Sheffield, who gave Wright his chance to be a hero, decided it was time to get moving. He took off for second. He beat the off-line throw from catcher Ronny Paulino and made it to third when the ball continued into the outfield. "I can steal bases," Sheffield said later. Not that anybody said he couldn't. Two years ago, with Detroit, he swiped 22 bases. Not bad for an old man.
Tatis reached first when he was hit by a pitch, but this game wasn't about Tatis.
Santos was back at the plate. "I saw the infield in," he said. So that tells us he pays attention. "I wanted to put the ball in play."
He swung at the first pitch and rapped the ball into left. Sheffield came home to end it.
This gives Santos 12 RBI in his last 14 games, a .276 average. That wasn't supposed to happen. He's 28 years old, and his only big league numbers are one (hit) in 10 (chances) with the Orioles last year. His first start for the Mets, April 19, he doubled and tripled. The double was his first extra-base hit. You might even wonder if he knew how to reach second base.
Eight days later, he smoked a grand slam. And smacked a game-winning two-run homer off Jonathan Papelbon when the Mets made that nice little stop in Boston last weekend.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseb ... Gz6DkyTJ&B

Hey BB, how's the diet and exercise thing going? Right now, IMO, THAT would give you the most bang for the buck.

BB, despite feeling like "who knows what is going on with me, but it could be a bunch of things" what really is helping me a LOT is focusing on my exercise program and good, healthy, moderate eating. It is something I can do NOW and do WELL and do on my own without the help of a doctor, without a prescription, without waiting for an appointment. Nobody can put me off and tell me I can't get started with this now because they won't give me an appointment for months on end. Getting going with the diet (healthy eating) and exercise NOW, GETS US GOING. If you need any encouragement or suggestions in this area, ask me because healthy living is a way of life for me...I think focusing on this aspect of my life had kept me sane and kept me going despite feeling like I was going backwards where doctors were concerned. We DO have control of our lives in this area...and Muffy is right, THAT WILL give you the most bang for the buck And for the most part, IT'S FREE

At the annual physical, the Muffy MD said "your vitamin D is a little low". Now that's a surprise, since she gets quite a bit of "real organic VitD" every day ("weather permitting"), and shoves in 2000 IU tablets (although in a somewhat disorganized fashion) like tic tacs.

That Vit D is important...we all need to be sure we are up to snuff on it. Since we rarely ever have a cloud in the sky where I live, east of El Paso, getting out and hiking does me up good on the Vit D (although I do take a Vit D supplement with my Calcium supplement). Another thing I do here though, is use an sunblock of SPF 90 on my exposed skin and shirts with sun protection built in...and wear wide brimmed hats and a wide brimmed visor on my riding helmet. The sun can be a killer

Listen to Muffy, BB...she knows what she is talking about
mar


I know
Muffy

See

mar

SaltLakeJan
Posts: 776
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:49 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Spoke with my Doctor

Post by SaltLakeJan » Sat May 30, 2009 5:46 am

Mornin' Muffy, Mar, & last, but not least, B.B.

Mar, Did the complete rundown on the Game - 'da METS won. . . .


[quote="]Muffy wrote:
My biggest fear is mixing up the data from the "triplets" (SLJ, BB and mar).[/quote]

If my "data is going to get mixed up with two other people, can I please get a couple who are less complicated??
Mar, would probably trade Hashimotos for Massive Allergic Conjunctitivitis. Even if she threw in the ranch, I wouldn't go for that. B.B., Your problems also look too complex. On the other hand, I'm not too excited about two days without sleep.
And, if either of you saw the condition of my eyes - - - -

All it would take now, is for OutaSinc to join our merry little band.

_________________
Mask: Mirage Quattro™ Full Face CPAP Mask with Headgear
Additional Comments: Began CPAP 1-16-2009, Pressure=10 cm, Mask, CMS 50Plus Oximeter

-SWS
Posts: 5301
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:06 pm

Re: Spoke with my Doctor

Post by -SWS » Sat May 30, 2009 10:03 am

Muffy wrote:
BleepingBeauty wrote:Disappointed, sure. I mean, I'm glad the doctor doesn't think I have complex sleep apnea..
I would respectfully, but vehemently, disagree. Looking at the total picture...
IMHO any non-cardiac patient who can produce that original AHI of 107, central apnea, and Cheyne Stokes respiration (along with such repeated clear pressure-induction patterns of central dysregulation) ain't never gonna be a vanilla obstructive etiology case---regardless of any appreciable degree of biological adaptation to machine pressure therapy over time.

That's precisely the kind of complex etiology that will in all likelihood present exactly the challenge at finding a sleep-restorative machine pressure that BB has been struggling with for more than a year. Perhaps the doctor said something more along the lines of: "You did not symptomatically present our clinic's diagnostic criteria for complex sleep apnea the night that we happened to record your sleep."

One of my questions for the doctor would be exactly what her diagnostic criteria for "complex sleep apnea" or "complex sleep disordered breathing" happens to be. I would wager a guess that she predominately requires a sufficient central AHI and/or CSR index be presented that particular night---disregarding any typical episodic tendencies from night to night or more subtle manifestations on any given night. Complex sleep-related breathing disorders can be highly episodic and even subtle IMHO. It's as if an underlying sensitive dependency can episodically skew/bifurcate stable sleep and even breathing itself. The end result of that underlying initial physiologic sensitivity to factors in pathophysiology result in episodic fits and spurts of central dysregulation and interrupted sleep in extreme cases---but arguably much more subtle astable cyclic alternating pattern causing poor sleep architecture and disproportionate following-day fatigue in those much more subtle cases. That latter nearly subclinical complex presentation seems to result in extremely disproportionate following-day fatigue as well.
Muffy wrote:Hey BB, how's the diet and exercise thing going? Right now, IMO, THAT would give you the most bang for the buck.
That's a load of hard work and such a difficult path IMHO. But I also think that advice is even more important for people like BB than perhaps even the rest of us---if she happens to have an underlying complex etiology that is as sensitive-dependent on underlying pathophysiologic variables as I strongly suspect. Minimizing diaphragmatic work load during sleep contributes to less neuromuscularly labored autonomic breathing---and that, in turn, contributes to uniformity in central signaling itself. Cardiovascular exercise during the day arguably establishes much healthier autonomic patterning in general. And patients with this complex underlying etiology are arguably the ones who will be much more susceptible to that disproportionate fatigue, at simply having to carry any given increased body mass----meaning it will wear them out to carry an extra sixty pounds throughout the day far more than it will ever wear out an otherwise healthy and identically overweight person.

Unfortunately complex sleep disordered breathing is a largely unknown/unexplored condition in sleep medicine today. And practicing clinics are ethically bound to work with poorly established clinical diagnostic criteria. BB, I would very politely ask the doctor what she thinks you have. I sure hope the answer isn't "obstructive sleep apnea". But I would also ask exactly which PSG and non-PSG details she presently focuses on to yield (or perhaps much more importantly rule out) a diagnosis of "complex sleep apnea" or "complex sleep disordered breathing".

User avatar
BleepingBeauty
Posts: 2454
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Aridzona ;-)

Re: What Are You Fixing?

Post by BleepingBeauty » Sat May 30, 2009 1:17 pm

Muffy wrote: it is very clear that there WAS CompSAS.

A careful titration and the passage of time may have contributed to this present study, which perhaps "did not exhibit characteristics of CompSAS", and this really shouldn't be a surprise.

A think a closer look at your response to some of the lower pressures may be beneficial.

Further, I think looking at sleep architecture should be coming more to the forefront.
It just hit me that there's no comparison to what is "good". Here's a little blurb:
somebody must've wrote:These are examples of hypnograms showing sleep architecture during a full night's sleep.
Muffy, my darling cupcake, thank you SO much for posting the graphs showing the varying hynograms with explanations re: what they mean. I understand that mine don't look good (awful, as you so succinctly put it), but since I had no idea what normal sleep architecture should look like, I had nothing to compare mine to. That was VERY helpful, so many thanks.
Before you drop a bundle on an APAP and software, which algorithm are you going to get? If you use the Respironics, what are you going to do if you get a download like you got in April (IMO, those screwy numbers are from an aggressive APAP approach-- remember the "maybe sitting on 7.0 cmH2O may produce good info" thing) but what if that was artifact from sleep transition issues (although I think looking at Variable Breathing would give a clue there)?

Muffy
Well, I've got a month before I see the doctor for the results, when I can ask my questions. But since she's apparently not of the opinion that I'm dealing with CompSAS, I don't imagine she'll recommend an ASV machine for me. (She seemed to backtrack, from my meeting with her a month ago, on the benefit of patients having access to data, so take that for what it's worth.) I don't have answers for your questions, Muff. I still feel like I'm very much in the dark about the treatment I need to correct my problems and, if my doctor doesn't see what others do, where do I go from there? It's all very unnerving, and I don't know what to do at this point...

I called the sleep lab this morning and had them fax me the report. It's five pages long and can be found here

All input is, of course, welcome.
Veni, vidi, Velcro. I came, I saw, I stuck around.

Dx 11/07: AHI 107, central apnea, Cheyne Stokes respiration, moderate-severe O2 desats. (Simple OSA would be too easy. ;))

PR S1 ASV 950, DreamWear mask, F&P 150 humidifier, O2 @ 2L.

User avatar
BleepingBeauty
Posts: 2454
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Aridzona ;-)

Re: Idle Thoughts...

Post by BleepingBeauty » Sat May 30, 2009 1:23 pm

Muffy wrote:My biggest fear is mixing up the data from the "triplets" (SLJ, BB and mar).
Oh, so this is where that post originated. (Shame on you, Jan, for confuzzling me! I'm confuzzled enough as it is, thanks.)
Hey BB, how's the diet and exercise thing going? Right now, IMO, THAT would give you the most bang for the buck.
The diet's going well, thanks. The exercise, not so much. Most days, it's a struggle the find the energy to exert myself. I haven't given up on it, but I'm not nearly as consistent with it as I'd like to be (and know I should be). I see the nutritionist again in a couple of weeks, but I don't think I've lost any weight.
Veni, vidi, Velcro. I came, I saw, I stuck around.

Dx 11/07: AHI 107, central apnea, Cheyne Stokes respiration, moderate-severe O2 desats. (Simple OSA would be too easy. ;))

PR S1 ASV 950, DreamWear mask, F&P 150 humidifier, O2 @ 2L.

User avatar
BleepingBeauty
Posts: 2454
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Aridzona ;-)

Re: Idle Thoughts...

Post by BleepingBeauty » Sat May 30, 2009 1:32 pm

robertmarilyn wrote: BB, despite feeling like "who knows what is going on with me, but it could be a bunch of things" what really is helping me a LOT is focusing on my exercise program and good, healthy, moderate eating. It is something I can do NOW and do WELL and do on my own without the help of a doctor, without a prescription, without waiting for an appointment. Nobody can put me off and tell me I can't get started with this now because they won't give me an appointment for months on end. Getting going with the diet (healthy eating) and exercise NOW, GETS US GOING. If you need any encouragement or suggestions in this area, ask me because healthy living is a way of life for me...I think focusing on this aspect of my life had kept me sane and kept me going despite feeling like I was going backwards where doctors were concerned. We DO have control of our lives in this area...and Muffy is right, THAT WILL give you the most bang for the buck And for the most part, IT'S FREE
True words, mar. The healthy eating is not a problem, and I've been doing well with that. But the energy for exercise IS a problem. I just need to force myself to get out and DO it, no matter what.

I'm having repeat bloodwork done on Monday and should have the results by the end of next week. We'll see if the numbers have improved from the last time, a couple of months ago. I'm betting they have.
Listen to Muffy, BB...she knows what she is talking about
mar

I know
Muffy

See

mar
Yes, she certainly does.
Veni, vidi, Velcro. I came, I saw, I stuck around.

Dx 11/07: AHI 107, central apnea, Cheyne Stokes respiration, moderate-severe O2 desats. (Simple OSA would be too easy. ;))

PR S1 ASV 950, DreamWear mask, F&P 150 humidifier, O2 @ 2L.