zoocrewphoto wrote:<snip>
I do appreciate that the signature is better than before. But I have had an icky feeling about this whole situation since it started. I do not like infomercials. I do not want somebody who hasn't slept with a cpap machine to preach to me about cpap basics. And I find it really odd that a question is asked (what is number 1, 2, etc), yet the answer is ignored and the lesson continues on.
And I really don't understand the motive. Everything being "taught" has already been discussed many times, and is not new and not very specific. I really think it is a way to discuss the topics in the book so as to improve his book.<snip>
From the "Basics - 3" thread:
SleepWellCPAP wrote:Chunkyfrog, that is a great line! <snip> With your permission, I would like to use that line in the second edition of my book.
There are vendors and vendors on this site. There are known, reliable forum members who sell used machines. They are providing value. There are known, reliable forum members like Karen (Pad-a-Cheek) who sell comfort products. They, too, are providing value. There are true experts, like Dr. Steven Park, who I believe has written books. They, too, are providing value. There are DMEs who appear to be here for educational/altruistic motives (Sleepstar springs to mind). She too is providing value AFAICT.
Then there is this situation. Judging from the above quote, the "Basics" threads are calculated to harvest forum content so that it can be repackaged and sold back to us or to future forum newbies. The "three best tips" that were offered in return were not, as I recall, particularly perceptive or useful. And has someone who's been fitting masks for ten years really never heard of the Lansinoh trick? That gave me pause.
One may ask: might this be a fair use of the forum in any event? After all, the information to be found here is not well-indexed, and the search engine, although serviceable, leaves a bit to be desired. So perhaps the creation of a "second edition," especially if it has a title less grandiose than "Definitive," would also provide value. On the other hand, the information generated by the Basics threads can also be found in the stickies at the top of the forum, especially "Where a Newbie Should Start."
Here is what I have concluded with regard to my own conduct (the only thing I have any control over). On occasion, I add content to the forum that could be harvested (usually on legislative/regulatory issues). I do so voluntarily and without expectation of compensation, and I will continue to do so. I'm not inclined to package any of it with a bow and add it to these threads for resale.
How we squander our hours of pain. -- Rilke