Sleep Apnea, to treat or not to treat!!!

General Discussion on any topic relating to CPAP and/or Sleep Apnea.
cyklopps
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 3:28 pm
Location: Easton PA

Re: Sleep Apnea, to treat or not to treat!!!

Post by cyklopps » Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:49 pm

Lizistired, The Oxygen concentrators can be had for $300 to $500 but my insurance pays to rent one for me. Weezy, your point is well taken.
Something else I wanted to add. I have had high PSA for years but never any Prostate Cancer. But due to my seeming higher risk for prostate cancer I have read a lot about it. Talk about options and trade offs!!!!!!!!!!! I hope I never get the real thing!!!!! But here too, there is a big debate over risk-benefit on how to treat men with this cancer. Everything from watchrul waiting to removing the prostate which is a big deal. The trend seems to be tilting recently toward not being so aggressive.
Does anyone know of animal studies concerning sleep apnea? Do other creatures get this? Phil

User avatar
SleepingUgly
Posts: 4690
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 9:32 pm

Re: Sleep Apnea, to treat or not to treat!!!

Post by SleepingUgly » Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:51 pm

cyklopps wrote:But if I were to find a study showing that my lifespan might be impacted by only a year or so by not doing CPAP or only the Oxygen I would
have to consider it.
What kind of study could test that? We'd need a prospective cohort that we would randomize to NO CPAP vs. CPAP, and then wait to see when they died! I am pretty certain this would not pass any ethical review boards because how could you ethically put anyone in the NO CPAP group?! Also, they'd have to be matched for other variables that kill people, and they wouldn't be because probably the No CPAP group would start to amass other health problems, in part because they may gain more weight, and in part because they would develop more diseases that also impact longevity.

If you were content with the oxygen, and your doctor thought it was efficacious, why are you considering CPAP? It sounds like a win-win situation if it works.

BTW, there are people on this board from all over the world, and I've read studies from various countries. CPAP is the treatment of choice for OSA everywhere, including countries with socialized medicine.
Never put your fate entirely in the hands of someone who cares less about it than you do. --Sleeping Ugly

User avatar
NotMuffy
Posts: 962
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:56 am
Location: Dunno. GPS is dead.

Re: Sleep Apnea, to treat or not to treat!!!

Post by NotMuffy » Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:00 pm

SleepingUgly wrote:
cyklopps wrote:But if I were to find a study showing that my lifespan might be impacted by only a year or so by not doing CPAP or only the Oxygen I would
have to consider it.
What kind of study could test that? We'd need a prospective cohort that we would randomize to NO CPAP vs. CPAP, and then wait to see when they died!
The early studies pairing weight loss (HAHAHAHAHAHA) and tracheostomy did exactly that.
"Don't Blame Me...You Took the Red Pill..."

User avatar
NotMuffy
Posts: 962
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:56 am
Location: Dunno. GPS is dead.

Re: Sleep Apnea, to treat or not to treat!!!

Post by NotMuffy » Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:21 pm

Meanwhile, looks like we got some upsets cooking in the brackets tonight.

Although Kentucky can hardly be called an upset.

Now where's that sometimes Kentucky fan?
"Don't Blame Me...You Took the Red Pill..."

User avatar
BlackSpinner
Posts: 9742
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 5:44 pm
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Contact:

Re: Sleep Apnea, to treat or not to treat!!!

Post by BlackSpinner » Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:28 pm

cyklopps wrote: I am also curious as to how the public health systems of other advanced nations deal with sleep apnea. I tend to respect what the Brits or Germans or Canadians for instance are doing in that they do not have profit driven medical systems. CPAP clearly is a godsend for those suffering various bad symptoms. But I have also heard especially for adults over 50 that a high percentage if tested would be found to have sleep apnea. Where is a reasonable line here. Potentially fifty million plus Americans on CPAP!!! How about cost verses benifit ratios.
I may well get my equipment set up properly and use CPAP. But if I were to find a study showing that my lifespan might be impacted by only a year or so by not doing CPAP or only the Oxygen I would have to consider it. We make these trade offs throughout our lives in many ways. Phil
Putting people on cpap is much cheaper then heart surgery or caring for stroke victims or complications due to diabetes. Preventative medicine is much cheaper in the long run. Plus you want to prevent the damage already done to those suffering various symptoms. And much nicer then caring for stroke victims, I have watched my mother going from an intelligent competent woman in 4 years to someone incapable of speaking a complete sentence, in a wheelchair and diapers due to strokes. So if you don't mind taking that risk for those final shorter years then think about the stress to your family.

_________________
Machine: PR System One REMStar 60 Series Auto CPAP Machine
Additional Comments: Quatro mask for colds & flus S8 elite for back up
71. The lame can ride on horseback, the one-handed drive cattle. The deaf, fight and be useful. To be blind is better than to be burnt on the pyre. No one gets good from a corpse. The Havamal

User avatar
NightMonkey
Posts: 801
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 2:43 pm
Location: Three seats, orchestra right

Re: Sleep Apnea, to treat or not to treat!!!

Post by NightMonkey » Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:33 pm

cyklopps wrote: Anyway I want to clear up a few things. First, I am a 64 year old MWM in good health, physically active, low bood pressure, low cholestoral, 6 feet 150 pounds. I was diagnosed with Sleep Apnea in 2009. My sleep study showed 39 apneas 85 hypopneas, with oxygen desaturation of 81%.
If it were me, I would want to know how many arousals are occurring while using supplemental O2 without CPAP.
NightMonkey
Blow my oropharynx!

the hairy, hairy gent who ran amok in Kent

User avatar
SleepingUgly
Posts: 4690
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 9:32 pm

Re: Sleep Apnea, to treat or not to treat!!!

Post by SleepingUgly » Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:39 pm

NightMonkey wrote:If it were me, I would want to know how many arousals are occurring while using supplemental O2 without CPAP.
Why? If he feels well during the day, what are the implications of untreated arousals that cause no daytime symptoms?
Never put your fate entirely in the hands of someone who cares less about it than you do. --Sleeping Ugly

User avatar
DoriC
Posts: 5214
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 9:28 pm
Location: NJ

Re: Sleep Apnea, to treat or not to treat!!!

Post by DoriC » Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:42 pm

Just the thought of not receiving available treatment to extend and improve quality of life would be a frightening scenario to consider. If you have a wife and family consider their anguish and grief if your life is shortened or they are left to become your caregivers and all while there was a valid diagnosis and successful therapy out there.

_________________
Mask: Mirage Quattro™ Full Face CPAP Mask with Headgear
Additional Comments: 14/8.4,PS=4, UMFF, 02@2L,
"Do or Do Not-There Is No Try"-"Yoda"
"We are what we repeatedly do,so excellence
is not an act but a habit"-"Aristotle"
DEAR HUBBY BEGAN CPAP 9/2/08

User avatar
NotMuffy
Posts: 962
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:56 am
Location: Dunno. GPS is dead.

Re: Sleep Apnea, to treat or not to treat!!!

Post by NotMuffy » Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:04 pm

Whoa, stick your head outside! The Supermoon's tonight!
"Don't Blame Me...You Took the Red Pill..."

User avatar
carbonman
Posts: 2523
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 7:57 am

Re: Sleep Apnea, to treat or not to treat!!!

Post by carbonman » Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:10 pm

W/a little ingenuity, perseverance and attitude adjustment,
cpap is just too easy for the benefits it brings to quality of life.
"If your therapy is improving your health but you're not doing anything
to see or feel those changes, you'll never know what you're capable of."
I said that.

User avatar
kempo
Posts: 1023
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 10:09 am

Re: Sleep Apnea, to treat or not to treat!!!

Post by kempo » Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:16 pm

Cy, if you decide not to use a xpap load up on life insurance. Your wife and her next husband can pull up to the grave yard every 6 months in the motorhome and put some fresh plastic flowers on your marker.

_________________
MachineMask

jnk
Posts: 5784
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Sleep Apnea, to treat or not to treat!!!

Post by jnk » Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:17 pm

NotMuffy wrote:Now where's that sometimes Kentucky fan?
Is this my cue to gloat and do my happy dance?

I'm surprised they made the Sweet. Good reflexes, plenty of talent, but a weird attitude. I can't put my finger on it.

User avatar
NotMuffy
Posts: 962
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:56 am
Location: Dunno. GPS is dead.

Re: Sleep Apnea, to treat or not to treat!!!

Post by NotMuffy » Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:30 pm

Butler over Pitt, unbelievable.
"Don't Blame Me...You Took the Red Pill..."

-SWS
Posts: 5301
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:06 pm

Re: Sleep Apnea, to treat or not to treat!!!

Post by -SWS » Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:36 pm

NotMuffy wrote:Butler over Pitt, unbelievable.
The on-topic translation for newcomers:

Butler= well-served by CPAP
Pitt= dark hole in the ground (for the wooden casket thanks to no CPAP)

cyklopps
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 3:28 pm
Location: Easton PA

Re: Sleep Apnea, to treat or not to treat!!!

Post by cyklopps » Sat Mar 19, 2011 8:01 pm

It must go without saying from a few recent posts that many on this forum never ever eat too much, exercise too little, chat on a cell phone while driving, exceed posted speed limits, much less participates in any risky sport. Risks that could kill us are all around and we all pick and choose. Phil