kteague wrote:About charging for downloads of the free seminar - I guess the cost of technology has to be absorbed somewhere. I mean, the phone seminar itself is free. Does the man has to do everything for free just because he cares about cpap users being successful? No matter how noble he may be, it is a business. He may find the downloads not widely requested at that price and decide cheap or free downloads would generate more book sales monies than the downloads themselves bring in.
Very good points, Kathy. Doctors have a business and are businessmen. Nothing wrong with that. That last sentence, which I took the liberty of putting in bold, is excellent. I agree, he can price his "product" any way he wishes. Each of his potential customers will buy, or not, depending on how much value they think a particular product of his may have.
jnk wrote:I have no resentment of profits.
Nor do I.
jnk wrote:a forum that, for me, seems based mostly on the principle of the free dissemination of helpful information to those who are often denied needed information by their sleep docs and DMEs is likely to have some negative reactions to sleep docs or DMEs posting links to infomercials. Such businesses and docs are free to do so, I guess. But others are free to react to it.
Excellent point, Jeff. I agree. My personal reaction to the $10 or $17 charge to download an audio of the teleseminar (depending on whether ordered in advance or after the event) was, "Forget
that!" Just my personal decision, as was my decision not to make the phone call that would have incurred long distance charges for me, to hear something not of value to me.
jnk wrote:There is a fine line between being a celebrity champion of a cause who makes a good living at it and being a heavy-handed self-promoter. The difference is often one of perception, since everyone may draw the line differently.
I agree. Absolutely.