Yes, that's seems reasonable to infer, particularly if the first belt expansion had a simultaneous recorded flow but the on the second expansion there was no recorded flow at the nostrils. But the algorithm to do that "look back" would be complicated, and probably not cost-effective.Grouchy Bear wrote: ↑Wed Jun 15, 2022 4:31 pmSo, could comparing belt movement with a previous breath and finding about the same movement, but no/very little flow through the nasal cannula could indicate either mouth breathing or an apnea? I think it gets complicated in that case, but one might be able to discern which is actually happening, with the detailed test results and graphs available to study.
I'd be really be surprised that the HSAT employed RIP belts (way too expensive and overly complicated data processing), more likely a strain-gage sensor built into the belt that measure changes in the length of the belt, or a piezoelectric transducer.
Lastly I agree with @Rubicon, the OP is likely misremembering, there is only one belt on the Resmed HSAT.
One thing that I would expect that the HSAT belt should be very good at is observing Central Apneas (because the chest is not being commanded to expand at all)