British Social Medicine - Disaster

General Discussion on any topic relating to CPAP and/or Sleep Apnea.
User avatar
CPAPIST
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 12:39 pm
Location: USA

Re: British Social Medicine - Disaster

Post by CPAPIST » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:43 pm

chunkyfrog wrote:It is a pity that these "friendly disagreement marathons" tend to cause urgent requests for help to drift down where they will not be noticed.
I was under the impression this was a "help forum"
--not a soapbox for those who seem to believe their powers of persuasion more effective than
donating money to the causes with which they so earnestly believe.

... she said in her best persuasive croak from her soapbox.
Cpapist

User avatar
chunkyfrog
Posts: 34545
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:10 pm
Location: Nowhere special--this year in particular.

Re: British Social Medicine - Disaster

Post by chunkyfrog » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:46 pm

Here we go again--name calling when logic fails,

_________________
Mask: AirFit™ P10 For Her Nasal Pillow CPAP Mask with Headgear
Additional Comments: Airsense 10 Autoset for Her

User avatar
CPAPIST
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 12:39 pm
Location: USA

Re: British Social Medicine - Disaster

Post by CPAPIST » Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:18 pm

chunkyfrog wrote:Here we go again--name calling when logic fails,
You've bumped the current political threads up more than your fair share.

You are addicted. 11,000 posts. Take another hit.
Cpapist

User avatar
NateS
Posts: 1716
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:53 pm
Location: Kaatskill Mts-Washington Irving

Re: British Social Medicine - Disaster

Post by NateS » Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:38 pm

CPAPIST wrote:
Danbury Baptist Association's letter to Thomas Jefferson, October 7, 1801.



ir, — Among the many millions in America and Europe who rejoice in your Election to office; we embrace the first opportunity which we have enjoyd in our collective capacity, since your Inauguration, to express our great satisfaction, in your appointment to the chief Majestracy in the United States; And though our mode of expression may be less courtly and pompious than what many others clothe their addresses with, we beg you, Sir to believe, that none are more sincere.

Our Sentiments are uniformly on the side of Religious Liberty — That Religion is at all times and places a matter between God and individuals — That no man ought to suffer in name, person, or effects on account of his religious Opinions - That the legitimate Power of civil government extends no further than to punish the man who works ill to his neighbor: But Sir our constitution of government is not specific. Our ancient charter together with the Laws made coincident therewith, were adopted on the Basis of our government, at the time of our revolution; and such had been our Laws & usages, and such still are; that Religion is considered as the first object of Legislation; and therefore what religious privileges we enjoy (as a minor part of the State) we enjoy as favors granted, and not as inalienable rights: and these favors we receive at the expense of such degradingacknowledgements, as are inconsistent with the rights of freemen. It is not to be wondered at therefore; if those, who seek after power & gain under the pretense of government & Religion should reproach their fellow men — should reproach their chief Magistrate, as an enemy of religion Law & good order because he will not, dare not assume the prerogatives of Jehovah and make Laws to govern the Kingdom of Christ.

Sir, we are sensible that the President of the United States, is not the national legislator, and also sensible that the national government cannot destroy the Laws of each State; but our hopes are strong that the sentiments of our beloved President, which have had such genial affect already, like the radiant beams of the Sun, will shine and prevail through all these States and all the world till Hierarchy and Tyranny be destroyed from the Earth. Sir, when we reflect on your past services, and see a glow of philanthropy and good will shining forth in a course of more than thirty years we have reason to believe that America's God has raised you up to fill the chair of State out of that good will which he bears to the Millions which you preside over. May God strengthen you for the arduous task which providence & the voice of the people have cald you to sustain and support you in your Administration against all the predetermined opposition of those who wish to rise to wealth & importance on the poverty and subjection of the people.

And may the Lord preserve you safe from every evil and bring you at last to his Heavenly Kingdom through Jesus Christ our Glorious Mediator.

Signed in behalf of the Association.
Nehh Dodge
Ephram Robbins The Committee
Stephen S. Nelson
BRAVO! +1

Nate

_________________
Mask: DreamWear Nasal CPAP Mask with Headgear
Additional Comments: ResMed AirCurve 10 ASV; Dreamwear Nasal Mask Original; CPAPMax Pillow; ResScan & SleepyHead
Central sleep apnea AHI 62.6 pre-VPAP. Now 0 to 1.3
Present Rx: EPAP: 8; IPAPlo:11; IPAPHi: 23; PSMin: 3; PSMax: 15
"I've had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it." —Groucho Marx

rkuntz
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:38 am

Re: British Social Medicine - Disaster

Post by rkuntz » Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:01 pm

"......till Hierarchy and Tyranny be destroyed from the Earth....."

Nate,
I fail to understand how a centrally planned health care system (or economy) can comply with those words. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the Biblical admonition to be your neighbors keeper and to love one another are personal obligations not societal.
Ray

User avatar
NateS
Posts: 1716
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:53 pm
Location: Kaatskill Mts-Washington Irving

Re: British Social Medicine - Disaster

Post by NateS » Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:30 pm

rkuntz wrote:"......till Hierarchy and Tyranny be destroyed from the Earth....."

Nate,
I fail to understand how a centrally planned health care system (or economy) can comply with those words. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the Biblical admonition to be your neighbors keeper and to love one another are personal obligations not societal.
Ray
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act does NOT create "a centrally planned health care system" nor "a centrally planned economy" Are you still falsely blaming Nancy Pelosi for not letting you read the law? Not even the Tea party is claiming that she forbid you from reading it after it was passed!

Regards, Nate

_________________
Mask: DreamWear Nasal CPAP Mask with Headgear
Additional Comments: ResMed AirCurve 10 ASV; Dreamwear Nasal Mask Original; CPAPMax Pillow; ResScan & SleepyHead
Central sleep apnea AHI 62.6 pre-VPAP. Now 0 to 1.3
Present Rx: EPAP: 8; IPAPlo:11; IPAPHi: 23; PSMin: 3; PSMax: 15
"I've had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it." —Groucho Marx

User avatar
49er
Posts: 5624
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:18 am

Re: British Social Medicine - Disaster

Post by 49er » Wed Dec 25, 2013 2:38 am

NateS wrote:
rkuntz wrote:"......till Hierarchy and Tyranny be destroyed from the Earth....."

Nate,
I fail to understand how a centrally planned health care system (or economy) can comply with those words. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the Biblical admonition to be your neighbors keeper and to love one another are personal obligations not societal.
Ray
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act does NOT create "a centrally planned health care system" nor "a centrally planned economy" Are you still falsely blaming Nancy Pelosi for not letting you read the law? Not even the Tea party is claiming that she forbid you from reading it after it was passed!

Regards, Nate
Exactly Nate. That ENT I am seeing next week was taken off of the list of providers of my new insurance plan. It wasn't listed on healthcare.gov. Now it is true I just can't see any old person but that is true for many employer based plans also as they have alot of restrictions.

rkuntz
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:38 am

Re: British Social Medicine - Disaster

Post by rkuntz » Wed Dec 25, 2013 8:53 am

NateS wrote:
rkuntz wrote:"......till Hierarchy and Tyranny be destroyed from the Earth....."

Nate,
I fail to understand how a centrally planned health care system (or economy) can comply with those words. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the Biblical admonition to be your neighbors keeper and to love one another are personal obligations not societal.
Ray
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act does NOT create "a centrally planned health care system" nor "a centrally planned economy" Are you still falsely blaming Nancy Pelosi for not letting you read the law? Not even the Tea party is claiming that she forbid you from reading it after it was passed!

Regards, Nate
Nate,
What are you talking about? Federal Taxation if you fail to purchase Health Insurance that complies with Federal Guidelines both policies that remove regulation from State hands and decision making from the hands of individuals and the companies that employ them isn't Centralization of Power and Planning? You are too intelligent not recognize that.

By the way Health Care is 20% of the Economy so the the ACA absolutely is "Economic" Central Economic Planning.

So far we've only been talking about the gateway to the ACA edifice that is visible to us as consumers. The backside where the Feds directly manage the behavior and practices of the Insurance Companies, Hospitals and Doctors completely falsifies your claim that "The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act does NOT create "a centrally planned health care system" nor "a centrally planned economy".

Re Pelosi:
Rep. Dave Obey the ex-congressman from my home district here in Wisconsin actually held the Gavel for Pelosi in the House when the ACA was rammed through, while Nancy circulated the floor breaking arms and propping up timid supporters. During that time I took my 10 year old daughter to Obey's local office to speak with his Chief of Staff about this legislation. I took my daughter for two reason's, one my wife was concerned that I'd say or do something I'd regret so I took Mariah along as a reminder to me of the importance to her of the topic under discussion, and two the topic under discussion directly concerned her more than I.

Before we went in to the meeting I told her that she was free to speak her mind and ask any question at any time because the outcome concerned her more than it did me. Additionally I tasked her with three tasks 1) she was to evaluate me and judge whether or not I was reasonable, logical and polite in my presentation (in her judgement I was) 2) From the verbals and non-verbals did the staffer understand understand what I was saying. (he did) 3) Did he agree. (he did not)

I am not, nor have I ever ripped on Pelosi or Obey, as in my view they are only movement tools.

So Nate answer for Mariah the question that Obey's Chief of Staff wouldn't.

Why are you doing this to us?

May God Bless You,
Ray