NateS wrote:rkuntz wrote:"......till Hierarchy and Tyranny be destroyed from the Earth....."
Nate,
I fail to understand how a centrally planned health care system (or economy) can comply with those words. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the Biblical admonition to be your neighbors keeper and to love one another are personal obligations not societal.
Ray
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act does NOT create "a centrally planned health care system" nor "a centrally planned economy" Are you still falsely blaming Nancy Pelosi for not letting you read the law? Not even the Tea party is claiming that she forbid you from reading it
after it was passed!
Regards, Nate
Nate,
What are you talking about? Federal Taxation if you fail to purchase Health Insurance that complies with Federal Guidelines both policies that remove regulation from State hands and decision making from the hands of individuals and the companies that employ them isn't Centralization of Power and Planning? You are too intelligent not recognize that.
By the way Health Care is 20% of the Economy so the the ACA absolutely is "Economic" Central Economic Planning.
So far we've only been talking about the gateway to the ACA edifice that is visible to us as consumers. The backside where the Feds directly manage the behavior and practices of the Insurance Companies, Hospitals and Doctors completely falsifies your claim that "The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act does NOT create "a centrally planned health care system" nor "a centrally planned economy".
Re Pelosi:
Rep. Dave Obey the ex-congressman from my home district here in Wisconsin actually held the Gavel for Pelosi in the House when the ACA was rammed through, while Nancy circulated the floor breaking arms and propping up timid supporters. During that time I took my 10 year old daughter to Obey's local office to speak with his Chief of Staff about this legislation. I took my daughter for two reason's, one my wife was concerned that I'd say or do something I'd regret so I took Mariah along as a reminder to me of the importance to her of the topic under discussion, and two the topic under discussion directly concerned her more than I.
Before we went in to the meeting I told her that she was free to speak her mind and ask any question at any time because the outcome concerned her more than it did me. Additionally I tasked her with three tasks 1) she was to evaluate me and judge whether or not I was reasonable, logical and polite in my presentation (in her judgement I was) 2) From the verbals and non-verbals did the staffer understand understand what I was saying. (he did) 3) Did he agree. (he did not)
I am not, nor have I ever ripped on Pelosi or Obey, as in my view they are only movement tools.
So Nate answer for Mariah the question that Obey's Chief of Staff wouldn't.
Why are you doing this to us?
May God Bless You,
Ray