RandyJ wrote:A well-respected forum member here commented that from a physics perspective (as in pressurizing a tire) that x amount of pressure should be the same whether it's one or two airways.
Yeah, this is why I say "in theory"...going by the laws of physics...once the pressure level is obtained...it should not matter because the pressure obtained isn't cut in half with half going to nasal and half going to mouth with FFM. That's not how the Physics works and if it did...we would be able to get by with a 50% reduction if we went to nasal interface and that simply doesn't happen..
Maybe the oral cavity sucks up a lot more than 50%...after all it is bigger.
But then we have those people who need the same pressure no matter which mask.
Then there are the people that say nose pressure is better because nature meant for us to breathe through our nose and not our mouths...well that's all and good to say but if a person can't breathe through their nose...we don't breathe through our skin so great so we have to use our mouths.
It is a puzzler for sure. I have often wondered about the 2 airway entrance thing myself. Logic tells me that it makes sense....but physics tells me it doesn't. So the best I can come up with is sometimes it matters and sometimes it doesn't and if a person is lucky enough to be able to reduce the pressure needs with a switch to nasal mask...hey just another check mark in the plus column for nasal masks in general. But as sure as I start telling people that they will be able to reduce the pressure needs with a nasal pillow mask...Murphy's Law is going to reach up and bit me in the butt and prove me wrong.
I may have to RISE but I refuse to SHINE.