I think for many people, if you call depression a symptom, there is some stigma that it is "caused" by something that they are responsible for. It's kind of like the "argument" that sleep apnea is only overweight people, therefore it is the person's own fault for being overweight, and that if they only lost weight, they would not have sleep apnea any longer. Many (although not all) of us on this board realize that this "theory" is just not true.jskinner wrote:...I'm very curious why there was such a strong reaction to my idea that depression is a symptom rather than a disease? I don't see how that idea changes anything about how terrible depression is. I have encountered this reaction a lot when I suggest it and ever quite understood the reaction. Do people think that calling it a symptom is some how dismissing its seriousness? I certainly don't believe that.
I think people who have battled long-term depression kind of feel the same way when someone says that the depression is not a medical condition--that then it must be "self-induced", or at least that it can be treated by just "getting over it".
I realize that is NOT what you had said, and I see now that you do understand the depth of depression. But I think that might be what some people think when they hear that it is a symptom. And, in case you haven't noticed many people who are currently struggling with depression have very little self esteem, and therefore take anything said against what they are currently doing as an insult, sometimes pushing them further into their depression.
Personally, I think it is a combination of a medical disorder made worse by other things (such as SDB, improper diet, failing relationships, etc, etc, etc.). I am personally very hopeful that if we can ever get my SDB under control, that my depression will improve. But I do believe there is a medical basis for depression. That's just MY personal opinion, and everyone is welcome to their own.