(This member posts from this thread have brought up a number of things. I can't address them all at once, but I have not forgotten the comments about the thyroid issue and the sleep surface or the suggestion about the ASV trial pressure.)
Upddate on my Average stats: Update Averages
5/21-9/6/2010 AHI 2.3, CA 1.6, OA 0.2, HI 0.4 Pressure Median 5.6, 95th 7.1, Max 8.2
As is evident by the OA of 0.2 my issue has predominantly been Central apneas. Then on 9/3 I had a long meditation session and the last 40 minutes it looks like I dropped off to sleep. Recently the S9 has shown that I haven't done well when in seated meditation which is why I tried on the back.
And I got this data which is what caused me to come unglued with frustration, especially since for many years meditation has been a place of renewal for me.
(Click on graphs to expand)
I have never before seen me have anything more than a smattering of OA. The few times I've slept on my back it typically looked like this:
It has taken me awhile to figure out why I would go from predominantly CA to such a run of OA. From the first week on the S9 I'd seen that I didn't do well on my back. So I have trained myself to sleep on my sides only, except in rare instances. So my average stats are largely based on sleeping on my sides. And with side sleeping I have consistently cut my autoset range down from 4-20 initially gradually to my current range of 4.4-9.
What I didn't realize this past Saturday is that I've never tried being on my back with the more narrow range. Which resulted in this:
So it looks to me like the S9 topped out in pressure but it wasn't enough to prevent the OA while on my back. At least knowing this makes it not seem so crazy to me. Does this line of reasoning seem plausible to you more experienced members?
Now that leads me to question if I'm like 2 people in terms of needed therapy. One is side sleeping where it seems like the 4.4-9 range on the S9 works pretty well. I know that the 4.4 is low, but I've looked extensively at my detailed pressure tracings at times when there are no events and I seem to be resting well. And I've seen that I spend a lot of time in the upper 4s and low 5s. This seems supported by the Median Pressure Average of 5.6. I also tried raising the lower end to 5.0 and I got aerophagia and didn't seem to do well. Similarly after my titration study I narrowed my range to 7-9 (since I was titrated for 8.0) but again I did not do well.
And with the Adapt SV even starting at 4.0 with a a minimum pressure support of 3 it provided a minimum on inspiration of 7.0--and again I seemed to be getting too much air. I am thinking that this is the case for side sleeping. And if that is the case then it doesn't seem like the Adapt SV can work for me--unless my my understanding of how the Adapt works or my reasoning is faulty. Can someone knowledgeable comment on this?
On the other hand, when sleeping on my back it seems that I need greater pressure and in that instance the Adapt SV was set too low in terms of EEP. This then brings into question the comment by the sleep tech after my titration study (which was primarily done on my back) who said they did not get me effectively titrated for the BiPAP autoSV (Respironics Omni-lab) as I kept going from the OA into CA.
Is there any ASV machine that could go low enough and not over aspirate me while on my side and still go higher for when I'm on my back?