stage0a wrote:Todzo wrote:
The person would come in for a couple of weeks of classes to learn how to put on, take off, use, and maintain the equipment. Practice would be done under the supervision of the instructor and/or helpers. At the end of this set of classes he would leave with the suitcase the little box was in....
So your saying turn a one nite PSG into a 2-3 week ordeal
Currently the run to the Sleep Lab or major hospital is quite an ordeal. Many cannot sleep during the studies and have to be given pharmaceutical aids to help them perhaps sleep some.
Often one must drive many miles to reach the lab.
But this system will be designed to work in the persons own home and to be comfortable for them to put on and use themselves. No great time hit to get to and from the sleep lab. No strangers. No strange room. You use it at times convenient to you which will reflect the actual times you normally sleep in your own bed which is where the data will finally be able to reflect how you actually sleep rather than how you try to sleep given the crazy stresses you would have seen in a sleep lab.
No “in lab effect”!
No “first night effect”.
Simply how you sleep.
As well, since several nights are looked at the natural human changes in stress of life, diet, weekly cycle, simply all the normal variance of being human and sleeping every night will be seen in the data. This is apparently something we currently know nothing about. I understand that there are currently some small studies being done in the home. No one has taken the time to find out how we sleep in our own homes. We only know how we sleep in the lab. We have not even done the basic, basic science yet.
So while the current PSG may be “golden” for those who get paid for them - lets stop calling what has no basic science behind it a “standard”. Simply, it is not.