soul_power wrote: What you linked to is a highly edited video from a party that has interests that aren't scientific. It holds no value whatsoever. If you want to have an informed non-biased opinion, the only sources you should use are peer-reviewed published scientific literature.
Sorry, I have not watched the video in So Well's link, but please tell me you are being entirely sarcastic.
If not you are creating quite a contradiction by using a van Gogh for an avatar and a name like soul_power.
van Gogh never published a single word of
peer-reviewed scientific literature and I am fairly certain he never read a single word of
peer-reviewed scientific literature. Therefore based on your logic
Starry, Starry Night has no value. If you truly believe this my advice is to stay away from art galleries and art collecting.
Also
soul_power is a reference to something that is not established in
peer-reviewed scientific literature.
My apologies if your brief statement was meant to be sarcastic. As sarcasm it is brilliant!