Banned wrote:
Yeah, but if we read and believe this stuff than we have to capitulate that
Snoredog was right, and who wants that?
E.g. "4.3.2.8 A decrease in IPAP or setting BPAP in spontaneous-timed (ST) mode with backup rate may be helpful if treatment-emergent central apneas (CSA) are observed. (Consensus)"
These look like clinical guidelines written by Snoredog!
Banned
I think what is more important than numbers is the logic behind how they go about correcting the event seen.
1. They start you off with 10 cm delta between EPAP and IPAP max. then you observe for partial obstruction such as Hypopnea
and Periodic Breathing (James's case seen on last report).
2. IF Hi or PB are seen AND IPAP working pressure is bumping into IPAP Max then they say to increase IPAP Max by 2 cm. You are now 12 cm above EPAP with IPAP Max, or a 12 cm spread, THEN they say if this does NOT eliminate the events,
3. Set Fixed BPM to 2 less than Spontaneous (meaning change BPM=Auto to BPM=Fixed), set Start I Time to "minimum" of 1.2. They don't tell you what to set IT=xx because they don't know what BPM you are getting in Spontaneous mode, so you do the math and figure it out as I did above.
It is my opinion:
1. You first try and eliminate the PB because PB can lead to Central Apnea.
2. Once you eliminate PB then you go about to eliminate residual Centrals.
So I see PB a more critical modality to eliminate then Centrals seen, because many of those may drop off once you correct the PB.
So in James's case he has about a weeks worth of data, PB is persisting in every report, it is time to move away from the BPM=Auto mode and try the BPM=Fixed mode according to the titration guide. They wouldn't tell you to go to that mode if it didn't fix it.
In the above calculations, I took his avg BPM rate seen on the report, subtracted 2 from it, think it left 12.5, next I figured out the duration of the breath from that same BPM/RR by dividing within 60 seconds, I then halved that and came to the 2.05 sec Inspiration Time. I think you can be a little shorter on BPM (i.e. 12 vs 12.5) and/or 1.7, 1.8 or 1.9 on IT time and it won't do any harm.
As mentioned before, I suspect the machine is not correcting his PB because the 4-minute sample the machine uses probably also contained a marginal amount of Periodic Breathing, that will throw off the BPM=Auto settings so it doesn't fully correct things when he lands there, by going to fixed settings you are assured those fail-safe settings will be set slower than spontaneous. Let's say he enters a cluster of PB and things become a train wreck with PB, that might last several minutes, now half your sample to be used for BPM=Auto mode is tainted. Ideally I would think you want that 4-minute moving sample data avg. to represent concurrent breathing.
IF IPAP Max ceiling is not being hit and PB continues to exist and the machine is not correcting it, then I read the logic behind the titration guide as wanting to slow overall breathing down. If this is done it will mean fewer BPM avg. seen on the report. Lower
BPM should also equate to greater peak and tidal volumes seen. A faster BPM/RR would make that go the other direction.
There is no need to move the IPAP Max ceiling up if the working pressure is not continually bumping into it. If you follow conventional Bi-level consensus if that would happen on a Bi-level you would bump up EPAP by 1 cm, then IPAP should fall to the bottom. While there is no written rule in the titration guide for a 10 cm delta from EPAP to IPAP max, it is where they start you off. There is nothing in the guide to indicate that there is a 10 cm delta from IPAP Min to IPAP Max or that it needs a greater working range.
someday science will catch up to what I'm saying...