Link between OSA and the "beer gut"

General Discussion on any topic relating to CPAP and/or Sleep Apnea.
split_city
Posts: 465
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Post by split_city » Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:33 pm

RosemaryB wrote:It is my understanding that BMI is associated with the severity of OSA, but not with the presence or absence of it. IOW, if you have mild apnea and gain weight, it will increase the severity of the disease. But if you have the disease and lose weight, the disease won't go away.

Any evidence to the contrary? I'm fairly new to all of this.
That's where research comes into it. There are many reasons why OSA may not go away when you lose weight but here are just two:

1) Age is another factor in terms of prevalance of OSA. So, a person may put on weight over the years, develop OSA, then lose weight but still have OSA. This could be due to the fact that this process has occurred over a relatively large time frame i.e. years. So the aging factor might explain why the OSA didn't disappear when the weight was lost
2) Obstructive events results in a lot of changes in muscle structure and function. Increased hypoxia (low oxygen episodes) during obstructive events remodels muscles and also parts of the brain. These changes might be permanent and consequently affect the upper airway even when an individual loses weight

User avatar
RosemaryB
Posts: 1443
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 6:19 pm

Post by RosemaryB » Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:16 pm

split_city wrote:
birdshell wrote:
RosemaryB wrote:
Having done doctoral level research myself, I can appreciate the need to narrow one's topic! However, narrowing one's topic in a way that perpetuates confirmation bias results in flawed research.

If you wish to study a link between OSA and hip/waist measurement, including both genders (or even studying women) would make a significant contribution and would strengthen your research. If I were on your committee, this is certainly one thing I would want to explore with you. Including gender would make a more sophisticated contribution to the field, and probably a more original one.
Rosemary, Daniel already gave some good reasons, but I just had to add this: He is working on a PhD under an advisor. (Yes, there is a committee to whom he answers, but they don't generally have as much input as the primary adviser.)

Maybe these things are not true for his program and university, but IMHO, and IMH experience, the adviser approves or denies the topic and each section of the dissertation. The true researcher doesn't really get to do anything on his or her own until AFTER the doctorate is actually earned. Go to the hallways of any university and talk to doctoral students. The stories will not only be entertaining, but also full of frustration.

One that I recall was the adviser would not like a section and want it done differently. The next time, the alternate way was not acceptable and the student had to use the first way--presented as if it had never been done. This happened with a few more flip-flops between the versions/methods, and became a private joke to see how many times each version had been used!

Thus, poor Daniel absolutely must do whatever he can to be graduated with his doctorate--and has little power over the exact hypothesis at this point. It is already set and underway.

User avatar
RosemaryB
Posts: 1443
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 6:19 pm

Post by RosemaryB » Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:42 pm

split_city wrote: 2) Obstructive events results in a lot of changes in muscle structure and function. Increased hypoxia (low oxygen episodes) during obstructive events remodels muscles and also parts of the brain. These changes might be permanent and consequently affect the upper airway even when an individual loses weight
Speaking of the brain, what's going on with the brain and sleep architecture? There are some atypical sleep patterns amongst the members of this forum. For instance, one person whose sleep study shows very little, if any, stages 3&4 sleep. My atypical feature is a lot of unexplained "spontaneous arousals" not accounted for by snoring or PLMs and there is another member with these as well. I do have a larger proportion of delta, too, around 30%. In my case, I don't have much hypoxia, just a dip or two below 90 in my sleep study.

I'm wondering if there's something going on in the brain, not necessarily the result of hypoxia, or the breathing mechanism, but perhaps something to do with the reticular activating system, melatonin production, or anything like that.

Since you work in a sleep lab, perhaps you see these kinds of atypical sleep studies. Are there thoughts about these other phenomena.

User avatar
blarg
Posts: 1407
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:21 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by blarg » Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:57 pm

RosemaryB wrote:I'm wondering if there's something going on in the brain, not necessarily the result of hypoxia, or the breathing mechanism, but perhaps something to do with the reticular activating system, melatonin production, or anything like that.
I'm really not trying to be in your face today, promise!

Yup, we have some weird sleeping patterns here. I think the biggest reason that would be is the people that have the most trouble sleeping are the ones that traditional treatment ("Here's your CPAP and I'll call you in 6 months") doesn't work well for, so they seek out info on their own, thus ending up here.

I'm a programmer Jim, not a doctor!

split_city
Posts: 465
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Post by split_city » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:08 pm

RosemaryB wrote:
split_city wrote: 2) Obstructive events results in a lot of changes in muscle structure and function. Increased hypoxia (low oxygen episodes) during obstructive events remodels muscles and also parts of the brain. These changes might be permanent and consequently affect the upper airway even when an individual loses weight
Speaking of the brain, what's going on with the brain and sleep architecture? There are some atypical sleep patterns amongst the members of this forum. For instance, one person whose sleep study shows very little, if any, stages 3&4 sleep. My atypical feature is a lot of unexplained "spontaneous arousals" not accounted for by snoring or PLMs and there is another member with these as well. I do have a larger proportion of delta, too, around 30%. In my case, I don't have much hypoxia, just a dip or two below 90 in my sleep study.

I'm wondering if there's something going on in the brain, not necessarily the result of hypoxia, or the breathing mechanism, but perhaps something to do with the reticular activating system, melatonin production, or anything like that.

Since you work in a sleep lab, perhaps you see these kinds of atypical sleep studies. Are there thoughts about these other phenomena.
Patients who come in for sleep studies generally have disturbed sleep architecture due to equipment, the bed, pillow, having to sleep on their back, the absence of their partner. It's hard to pinpoint the reason why the patient you mentioned had a lack of stage 3 & 4 sleep. What I said above might explain this. Did this person have much REM? What was their AHI?

There is an area of sleep studies which is looking at the "arousal threshold." Some people have a low arousal threshold (perhaps in your case) or a high threshold. There are several factors which influence the arousal threshold including:
1) sleep stage
2) drug use
3) alcohol use
4) sleep deprivation

Studies have looked at what induces an arousal. These include:
1) CO2 levels
2) Oxygen levels
3) Upper airway resistance
4) Respiratory drive i.e. how hard you're breathing
5) Respiratory muscle activity
4) Fatigue of respiratory muscles

Interestingly, it was shown by our group that hypoxia impacts upon this arousal threshold. Furthermore, another group showed that despite different chemical stimuli i.e. CO2 and hypoxia, subjects aroused at the same respiratory drive (measured by oesophageal pressure). While a different group concluded that arousal was triggered at a certain point at which the diaphragm became fatigued.

Our lab has looked at whether arousal is good or bad. It's good because it allowed restoration of airflow and also prepares us for the "fight or flight response." How is it bad though?

1) Breathing rate is generally regulated by CO2 levels in the blood
2) You stop breathing when CO2 in your blood falls below a certain level (apnoea threshold).
3) When you arouse, you hyperventilate due to increased CO2 in the blood.
4) Typically, you blow off so much CO2, the CO2 levels fall below the apnoea threshold and then you begin to hypoventilate
5) At the same time, your upper airway muscles are switched off due to low CO2 levels
6) When falling back asleep, a number of people develop a central apnoea.
7) CO2 builds so breathing starts again, but the muscles are still turned off --> allowing for upper airway collapse.
Arousal is triggered, followed by hyperventilation etc...and cycle begins again


Kind of got off the track but I thought it would be good to discuss. Sleep architecture is controlled by a number of systems. It all comes down to which side the seesaw is tilted i.e. hormones which control sleep versus those which control wakefulness. A lot of work has been done in this area. However, this isn't something I have studied in any great detail


SidecarMike
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:46 pm

Post by SidecarMike » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:24 pm

Wulfman wrote:Here's a link that I've posted a few times before.

http://www.sleepreviewmag.com/article.p ... 006/07&p=8

I think you should change your study to "How many people had sleep deprivation in the years leading up to their onset of OSA?"
Or leading up to weight gain? I've had sleep problems and loud snoring since I was in elementary school. I didn't start gaining weight until about 7 or 8 years ago when I quit smoking. Until that time I had a 34 inch waist and weighed 170. I believe my weight gain is a result of sleep problems. The less I sleep, the less I exercise and the bigger I get. I peaked at 275. I'm down to 256 since January, coincidently about the same time I started the bipap.


split_city
Posts: 465
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Post by split_city » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:29 pm

SidecarMike wrote:
Wulfman wrote:Here's a link that I've posted a few times before.

http://www.sleepreviewmag.com/article.p ... 006/07&p=8

I think you should change your study to "How many people had sleep deprivation in the years leading up to their onset of OSA?"
Or leading up to weight gain? I've had sleep problems and loud snoring since I was in elementary school. I didn't start gaining weight until about 7 or 8 years ago when I quit smoking. Until that time I had a 34 inch waist and weighed 170. I believe my weight gain is a result of sleep problems. The less I sleep, the less I exercise and the bigger I get. I peaked at 275. I'm down to 256 since January, coincidently about the same time I started the bipap.

User avatar
Bamalady
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:33 pm
Location: Alabama

Post by Bamalady » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:42 pm

Since I was not overweight, but was mildly depressed, I believe it was due to the lack of oxygen ...... at least as far as I was concerned.

User avatar
Bamalady
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:33 pm
Location: Alabama

Post by Bamalady » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:51 pm

It's hard to pinpoint the reason why the patient you mentioned had a lack of stage 3 & 4 sleep. What I said above might explain this. Did this person have much REM? What was their AHI?
I know that I am not the only one that has had this type of sleep pattern or findings when having their Sleep Study, but I am one. I slept 6 1/2 hours. Had Stage 1 & 2 sleep with a little less than 5 minutes of REM just before I woke. I never reached Stage 4 or 5. I was told it was due to arousals.


split_city
Posts: 465
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Post by split_city » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:55 pm

how many arousals did you have an hour? Do you know whether they were associated with sleep apnoea events or leg movements?

User avatar
Elle
Posts: 1229
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:47 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Elle » Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:01 pm

Blarg, that is the ugliest cat. glad to see that in your wisdom and maturity you have lightened a scary atmosphere.

User avatar
Bamalady
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:33 pm
Location: Alabama

Post by Bamalady » Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:06 pm

Daniel.....I don't have my results handy. Will find it tomorrow, but I have Mild Apnea. There were no leg movements reported except when changing positions.

split_city
Posts: 465
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Post by split_city » Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:11 pm

How did you think you slept? As I said previously, the sleep lab environment will certainly impact upon your sleep architecture. While I would prefer that my patients/volunteers have one night for acclimatisation before a sleep study, I simply don't have the time to undertake this extra night

User avatar
blarg
Posts: 1407
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:21 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by blarg » Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:17 pm

Elle wrote:Blarg, that is the ugliest cat. glad to see that in your wisdom and maturity you have lightened a scary atmosphere.
Well, in that case, I'm happy to report:

Image

Ok, I'll quit bombing the thread with cats now.
I'm a programmer Jim, not a doctor!

User avatar
Bamalady
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:33 pm
Location: Alabama

Post by Bamalady » Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:19 pm

Daniel....I was so exhausted at that point that I thought I slept very well. Didn't wake all night. But then I had my favorite pillow with me. Seriously, I always thought I slept well, and as it turned out I was correct...just wasn't getting enough deep sleep / REM.