Rubicon wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 3:29 pm
I'll save you the trouble. Here's the offensive exchange:
Thanks for posting that discussion, Rubicon!
Rubicon wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 4:43 pm
lazarus wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 4:17 pm
I suspect the entire bases of the panic among the minions may have been my "let them live" and your "suicide by moderator."
They're grasping at anything trying to win a point.
[...]
I don't think I'd ever trust anyone calling himself "The Professor Of PAP" (sheesh!). Let alone expect much of a discussion forum with "Like" buttons.
They are focused on the community aspect, and no doubt hoping to get investors eventually.
Now, just imagine being an investor, coming to their forum, counting "Likes" and discovering that "The Professor of PAP" who wants an investment has less "Likes" than other people. That would be
extremely disruptive to the" community they're trying to build". Of course such threads have to be stopped before the damage becomes too obvious.
Commendable restraint, Rubicon!
kbh209 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 2:23 pm
Let's hope that the SleepHQ founders and staff get through the pride and remember that in order to be a good business, they have to be willingly open to accept both positive and negative criticism of their consumers and use those criticisms to approve their product.
Or else, the founders will founder in their own lack of integrity.
And now here is my secret, a very simple secret; it is only with the heart that one can see rightly, what is essential is invisible to the eye.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Good advice is compromised by missing data
Forum member Dog Slobber Nov. 2023