billbolton wrote:How do you know how likely or unlikely that is for Australia Here's a clue, Australia is NOT like the USA (thank goodness).
In Australia, the wealthy pay most of the taxes, just like in the US.
billbolton wrote:Actually its not accepted by the medical profession as a whole. It is just one data point in a vast array of healthcare delivery data.
It's one of the best "data points". Not the best, not end all be all, but one of the best. Actually, comorbidity is being increasingly found to negatively impact survival, even with aggressive cancer. This is surprising because conventional wisdom was that your cancer will kill you before your underlying diabetes or COPD will, but in fact more recent evidence suggests otherwise. Thus, controlling for comorbidities, which is primarily a function of genetics and cultural/social forces, is necessary. That's why saying something like 'the average life-expectancy in country X is greater than Y, thus X has a better health care system than Y' is apples to oranges.
billbolton wrote:Your gingoistoc view of advances in healthcare is way out of line with WHO data.
Slow down there, I am not a radical nationalist. I don't believe that the US is the only legit country or think every other nation needs to worship at our feet. But it is a fact that the US has the largest health care system by dollars, the largest research investment by dollars, and thus produces the majority of the academic and industry output in the area of medical technology. It doesn't mean Australians don't put out quality work, but the stagnancy of the state-run system prevents it from delivering the full potential of technological advances a free market medical economy can (and does).
montana wrote: It will take time folks ..we will go kicking and screaming into a better system BUT it WILL be OK.... Do not fret.
As long as we have Hope©, right!
unadog wrote:This rate is often used as an indicator of the level of health in a country
Again, the level of health in a country is primarily determined by factors entirely outside the realm of modern medicine. Studies on topics ranging from smoking cessation to weight loss to drug addiction - i.e. the underlying, driving forces behind the top killers in AMerica - have found that health care professionals only have minor influence on these factors. Implementing the most socialist universal health care program you can imagine is not going to change the fact that Americans make lifestyle choices that are in direct opposition to healthy living.
It's the culture, silly.
mars wrote:For something that started out as a feel-good post about my dental treatment, it sure morphed into something different.
Quit feigning innocence. It wasn't a feel-good post, you were flame baiting.
mars wrote:I have avoided every discussion of the American Healthcare system that has been on this forum, but foolishly responded to the bait that Bob3000 set out for me. I acknowledge that failing on my part.
Actually, I was dead serious. Unless you are in the upper class (financially), you owe your health care services to evil, greedy capitalist pigs. Ironic, no?
mars wrote:It was lies and misrepresentation, and so I foolishly responded again, getting further into the quagmire.
I don't claim to be all-knowing, so certainly I can unintentionally post inaccurate information, but I have not and would not intentionally deceive you or anyone else on this board.
mars wrote:They are the true casualties of the lies of So Well and Bob3000.
Melodramatic much? I haven't lied. I may be wrong (doubt it) but I haven't intentionally misled or lied about anything. No reason to.
mars wrote:...especially from such hypocrites as those two.
I've no clue how you concluded that I was a hypocrite.
mars wrote:And challenging blatant dishonesty is the only way to make sure the liars and hypocrites do not get a free ride,
I've been called a liar, an idiot, a hypocrite, and probably more in this thread. You can read
my previous post for my response to your personal attacks.