sleeplessmommy wrote:Could the PLMs come from his night terrors and his thrashing about in his sleep?
Absolutely not.
Consequently, if the PLMs WERE scored on that basis, that would be ANOTHER major error. ANY PLMs in a small child are worrisome.
"IMHO" this (these) reports are now completely suspect. Reporting 0.0 Sleep Onset is a blunder. Reporting SOREM is a blunder. Reporting ETCO2 >46 (instead of >50 mmHg) is a blunder. Saying the kid has UARS is a blunder. Reporting PLMs may be a blunder. Inadequate titration may be a blunder.
At this point (and "IMHO") everything becomes suspect. If they're scoring PLMs off artifact it could also be that they're scoring respiratory events off artifact and those results are spurious. I mean, can one safely say, "Well, all those parameters are wrong, but we're going to take the AHI as Gospel"? How does know when a liar is telling the truth?
IIWY (and I'm not) I'd find out EXACTLY what was happening all the way back to Square One (I don't mean to sound skeptical, because I'm not. I'm way beyond cynical).
BTW, and at the risk of generalizing, the effectiveness of any treatment for SRB other than CPAP is ~50% (and that (TTBOMK) includes RPE) so you may need to continue therapy with/after that intervention.