jnk wrote:hyperlexis wrote: . . . My question was, and remains, please cite a peer-reviewed study or authoritative text that states providing elderly Medicare patients with prescribed, basic CPAP, vs more costly data-capable machines, is inherently dangerous or would have a statistically significant result in patients causing auto accidents.
Anything, something. Even hinting at it. Please.
Every study ever made of PAP therapy by OSA patients has found that discontinuing use is dangerous.
Have you found a study that suggests otherwise?
Rather than just making pronouncement after pronouncement based on conjecture or repetitive anectdotes relating to you, yourself, and my, you again, it's very simple. Show us a scientific study that proves that the base CPAP model sold and prescribed to hundreds of thousands of people across the country is inherently inferior when it comes to patient care and ultimate clinical outcome -- or that such patients have statistically higher rates of car accidents as one poster gravely warned above. Because if so, shouldnt all basic CPAP machines be outlawed or recalled? Hmmm?
Because face it. These people bitching on here are simply worried (most likely totally unwarrantedly) that Medicare is finally going to crack down on overutilization and they are no longer going to have the US taxpayers pony up for the fancier machines they have been currently getting from Medicare -- and are instead in coming years going to be eventually re-supplied only with cheaper, base model 'bricks.' -- And/or that they will then personally have to cough up the difference in price for the cadillac machines with heated tubes and fancy color displays. Worried over the plight of their poor, fellow apneacs? Please. Selfishness pure and simple. How many people under 65 on this site cant even get insurance at all. How many of them would kill for a basic machine, if anything.
Other parties with different vested interests (the DME people on here) are themselves worried their profit margins will be slashed because Medicare will demand competitive bids on DME equipment.
And FYI, believe it or not, CPAP is no more special than any other type of DME, be it crutches or beds in a hospital, regardless of it needing to be 'tailored' to each patient. The xPAP devices themselves are not unique at all regardles of what the manufacturers boast. There are different categories, such as BiPap and CPAP and APAP, humidified or non humidified, but aside from that, each machine within a sub-category does the same thing and can be adjusted in the field for each patient's prescription. So if Uncle Sam wants a contract bid out on 100,000 BiPaps for states A, B, and C, then why not open that for competitive bidding? Why shouldnt the cheapest, clincially effective FDA approved BiPap supplier get the contract for Medicare patients? As long as they do the job as designed at the least cost to the taxpayers, that's all that matters.
And if someone wants a cadillac machine let him pay the difference or prove that a more expensive machine is absolutely needed for proper treatment to get a waiver.