LinkC wrote:archangle wrote:
Translation: "I did it and didn't die, so therefore it's not dangerous."
Very good argument. Works for seatbelts or drunk driving as well.
Seriously now, do you REALLY think that's a legitimate comparison? Really?
If so, you are MUCH less intelligent than I thought. (Maybe misspelling your own username should have been clue...)
If not, you are being intentionally disingenuous when your chicken little "risks" are debunked for all to see. In my book, that's even worse!
Your response to being exposed as consistently wrong is "Foe me"??? Sad...
No, you are the one being deliberately disingenuous.
No one has done ANY debunking other than presenting the argument "I did it and I haven't died yet." That's an incredibly foolish argument. The point about drunk driving or seatbelts is a very clear argument that shows how foolish the argument is that "I did it and I didn't die."
We KNOW that drunk driving and not using seatbelts increase the risk of death in a car accident. That makes it very clear how foolish the "I did it and haven't died yet" argument is.
Cigarette smokers used to use the same argument whenever someone said smoking was bad for their health. "My grandpa smoked a pack a day for all his life and he's 80 years old." It was only later after statistical studies were done that it became generally accepted that smoking causes cancer. The smokers continued to be adamant about smoking not being dangerous for quite a while. Some still deny the risk.
No one has done a large scale controlled study of the risks of taping. If one of us apneacs die in our sleep with tape on our mouth, do you know that any coroners will investigate any further than figuring out it's not foul play? I presume that some tapers die in their sleep just like other CPAPers do. Can you cite any studies done on these fatalities to determine whether taping was a factor in the death?
The burden of proof is on the person claiming something is safe despite the warnings from the medical experts. The burden of proof is not on someone who warns about the potential risks.
Assume a taper did die in his sleep from taping. It would be unlikely for his survivors to figure out that taping did it. Then it would be unlikely one of his survivors would know about this board and post about it. In the extremely unlikely event that his widow posted "taping killed my husband when the power went out?" what would you say? I bet you'd argue that he died from his apnea because of the power failure and he would have died even if he hadn't been taping. After all, you yourself tape all the time and haven't died yet.
If taping isn't potentially dangerous, why are all full face masks equipped with "anti-asphyxia" valves? Note the word "asphyxia." Taping your mouth shut with a nasal mask is sort of like having a full face mask with no anti-asphyxia valve.
If someone wanted to use a full face mask without an anti-aphyxia valve, would you object to me warning people that the valve is there to reduce the risk of asphyxia?
By the way, thanks to all the taping risk deniers. Hopefully a number of newbies who might have skimmed over the one post warning I post earlier have now given more thought to the issues involved and are now better equipped to make an informed decision about the risks.