I just want to speak up on behalf of adults with Asperger's (like my fabulous and wonderful husband) ... while to some extent the way they *show* emotion is "acting," that doesn't mean that they don't *feel* the emotion, because they do (I know you didn't say that, but it's a common misperception). It's like ... let's say that for whatever reason, you'd never smiled in your life. You felt happy sometimes, you just didn't smile when you got happy. And then eventually you learned that people smile because they are happy. So you started to smile on purpose whenever you felt happy, so other people would know you were happy. And hopefully, eventually, you start to smile automatically every time you were happy. But that doesn't mean that you aren't actually happy ... it just means that the way you show it is something you had to learn. (On the other hand, maybe you instinctively knew how to fix a computer, whereas someone else had to read the directions. It has advantages and disadvantages.)bearded_two wrote:I know a guy with Asperger's syndrome, aka high functioning autism, and have read a couple of books on how Aspies cope with the world.
As was mentioned, there is a spectrum of levels and types of autism. If he has high functioning autism, Aspies can live relatively normal and productive lives. Aspies have difficulty interacting with other people because they can't read emotions and do not know how to show emotion. Many Aspies have taught themselves how to read other peoples emotions, how to react to those emotions, and how to express emotions -- they are acting when they appear to show emotion. Aspies can excel in certain professions, and some number of "geeks" are Aspies.
A huge recent study done in the UK on people of all ages (birth to 70s) in six countries (UK, Japan, Sweden, US, Brazil, and ... I forget, maybe Switzerland?) found that 1% of the population is on the autism spectrum, across all ages and in every country. What seem to be differences in rates across age groups or in different geographical areas are probably questions of diagnosis methods and people being more alert to symptoms. When the same group of scientists used the same test on tens of thousands of people, there were no differences in rates.