I personally love that paper by Sanford! It almost makes me want to replace the usual apples-and-oranges objection with more far more dissimilar comparisons like:ozij wrote:Thanks for catching my mistake, -SWS.
Here's the link again --
Apples and Oranges -- a Comparison
by Scott A. Sandford, NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, California
O.
"Whoa! That's like comparing apples with no-longer-manufactured lawn darts!"... or
"Isn't that like comparing early retirement with oranges?"... or
"Hey, that's like comparing twelve long years on the calendar with bright red!"
While the logic truly holds up much better, somehow the message initially gets lost in that far greater disparity. That psychological term "cognitive accessibility" comes to mind. Can you imagine the initially-puzzled expressions on peoples' faces if we used far more logically-sound wording and frequently changed it up? So apples and oranges it is!