dsm wrote:Another summary that avoids the 'apnea' double entendre...
Resmed clearly described apnea as not snore and not flow limitations---but as apneas.dsm wrote:'Apnea' has 2 meanings
There was absolutely no monkey business in my also referring to an apnea as just that. I don't think the statement that received reproach and correction earlier in this thread referred to an apnea as anything but an apnea either.
But now an apnea in this conversation is both: 1) an apnea, as well as 2) an entire mix of things that fall under the OSA spectrum?
Personally I found Resmed's own statements, as well as the statement that got incorrectly reproached earlier in this thread, to have agreed very nicely. And that's no monkey business on my part then or now. I still don't see what the big correction was all about when those words corroborated what Resmed put in print----and without apnea double-speak!
Just so that I understand... so far you have accused ME of being the one delivering "swirling dances", "artful dodging", and "monkey business". And yet you were the one administering reproachful corrections without a shred of Resmed proof... and then went on to introduce a brand new and second apnea definition that no one else in the thread was using. They were using Resmed's terms instead.
In light of all that, will everyone please pardon all my "swirling dances", "artful dodging", and "monkey business".
You sure seem to.dsm wrote:Don't you just love word plays





