Amen, Velbor.Velbor wrote: . . . there is little justification in implying or suggesting that ResMed "ignores" hypopneas. . . . Velbor
It is confusing to me when people imply that a machine without an oximeter is supposed to call certain flow limitations hypopneas and not others. How can ANY machine without an oximeter claim to know a hypopnea from a flow limitation? None can, as Arizona-Willie noted. So shall we condemn ResMed for being overly honest in their carefully worded descriptions of what they do, and praise the companies that use sloppier wording?
I say that the machines using the AutoSet algorithm far from ignore hypopneas. If anything, the problem is the exact opposite--they pay too much attention to flow limitation in that they seem to score most any flattened bell-curve as a hypopnea in reporting AHI. But, given a choice, my preference is for oversensitivity in reporting flow limitations. So I ain't complainin'.
I likewise find it confusing when some suggest a machine is bad because it doesn't "react" to an apnea above 10cm. Why react to something you prevent? Isn't that like calling a guy a bad mechanic because his preventative maintenance keeps him from having to work on his car all the time?
If my AI is below 1, why would I complain about what the machine would have hypothetically done had there been some sudden apnea, with no precursors, that 10cm wouldn't have resolved? If that were to happen on a regular basis, my lcd would be telling me about it every mornin'. So I ain't worrying about somethin' that ain't happening!
I'm not trying to defend anyone's algorithm. All the machines could use some improvement, IMO. I just felt like throwing around my uneducated opinion. That's what forums are for, after all!
jnk