Sleep Apnea Boosts Death Risk

General Discussion on any topic relating to CPAP and/or Sleep Apnea.
User avatar
DreamDiver
Posts: 3082
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:19 am

Sleep Apnea Boosts Death Risk

Post by DreamDiver » Mon Aug 04, 2008 7:26 am

I found this article this morning. The subtext about whether treatment works seems lost in the article because in the conclusion, they say treatment is worth it.


http://health.usnews.com/articles/healt ... -risk.html
Sleep Apnea Boosts Death Risk
But it's unclear whether treating the breathing disorder cuts the danger, one expert says
Posted August 1, 2008

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

FRIDAY, Aug. 1 (HealthDay News) -- The interrupted nighttime breathing of sleep apnea appears to increase the risk of dying, Australian researchers report.
Related News

* Video: Health News & Features
* Join a Discussion
* More from Health

Earlier studies have linked sleep apnea to increased risk for death. However, these studies were done in sleep centers rather than in the general community. This new study suggests that the risk is present among all people with obstructive sleep apnea.

"This is the first study to demonstrate an independent association betweenall-cause mortality and sleep apnea in a community-based study," researcherNathaniel Marshall, a postdoctoral fellow at the Woolcock Instituteof Medical Research in Sydney, said in an American Academy of Sleep Medicine news release.

"The size of the increased mortality risk was surprisingly large," Marshall said. "In our particular study, a sixfold increase means that having significant sleep apnea at age 40 gives you about the same mortality risk as somebody aged 57 who doesn't have sleep apnea," he said.

Sleep apnea is a common problem in which one has pauses in breathing or shallow breaths during sleep.

The report was published in the Aug. 1 edition of Sleep.

For the study, Marshall's team collected data on 380 men and women, 40 to 65 years old, who participated in the Busselton Health Study. That study is an ongoing survey of residents in the rural town of Busselton in the state of Western Australia.

Among these people, three had severe obstructive sleep apnea, 18 had moderate sleep apnea, and 77 had mild sleep apnea. The remaining 285 people did not suffer from the condition.

During 14 years of follow-up, about 33 percent of those with moderate to severe sleep apnea died, compared with 6.5 percent of those with mild sleep apnea and 7.7 percent of those without the condition, Marshall's group found.

For patients with mild sleep apnea, the risk of death was not significant and could not be directly tied to the condition, the researchers note.

"Our findings ... remove any reasonable doubt that sleep apnea is a fatal disease," Marshall said. "People who have, or suspect that they have, sleep apnea should consult their physicians about diagnosis and treatment options."

Dr. David M. Claman, director of the Sleep Disorders Center at the University of California, San Francisco, believes this study strengthens the conclusion that severe obstructive sleep apnea does contribute to cardiovascular illness and death.

"This Australian data has additional strengths in that it is a population-based prospective sample with a long period of follow-up," Claman said.

However, the researchers could not assess whether there were any beneficial effects of a common apnea treatment called Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Claman said. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) treatment blows air into a person's nose to keep the airway from collapsing.

"Further work is needed to see if mild obstructive sleep apnea is associated with adverse effects and if Continuous Positive Airway Pressure treatment reduces cardiovascular risk in larger populations," he said.

In another report in the same issue of the journal, researchers from the University of Wisconsin uncovered findings similar to those in Australia.

In the Wisconsin study, researchers found severe sleep apnea was associated with a threefold increased risk of dying. In addition, for those with moderate to mild sleep apnea, the risk of death was increased 50 percent compared with people without sleep apnea. However, this increased risk was not statistically significant, the researchers report.

"Our findings of significant mortality risk with untreated sleep disordered breathing, in conjunction with prior evidence that Continuous Positive Airway Pressure can effectively treat severe sleep disordered breathing, underscore the immediate need for heightened clinical recognition and treatment of sleep disordered breathing," the researchers concluded.

_________________
Mask: ResMed AirFit™ F20 Mask with Headgear + 2 Replacement Cushions
Additional Comments: Pressure: APAP 10.4 | 11.8 | Also Quattro FX FF, Simplus FF

User avatar
Julie
Posts: 20051
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 12:58 pm

Post by Julie » Mon Aug 04, 2008 7:32 am

We know, we know... we SO know! Thanks for the reminder.

User avatar
DreamDiver
Posts: 3082
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:19 am

Post by DreamDiver » Mon Aug 04, 2008 8:39 am

Mmm... I'm not so much preaching to the choir here as giving an example of what little news there is on the subject in major media outlets. The fact that the subtitle seems to negate it is what bothers me.

Most people only read the first couple lines. They'll assume the article is about the uselessness of treatment rather than that it is in fact useful.

I want to shoot the editor.


_________________
Mask: ResMed AirFit™ F20 Mask with Headgear + 2 Replacement Cushions
Additional Comments: Pressure: APAP 10.4 | 11.8 | Also Quattro FX FF, Simplus FF

jnk
Posts: 5784
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:03 pm

Post by jnk » Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:00 am

I understand and agree with your reaction to the editor choosing the most controversial statement to lead with. But we may not want to shoot. Statistically speaking, it's a defendable position, so the editor might shoot back at us. As another summary explains the lack of data . . .

http://www.medpagetoday.com/PrimaryCare ... s/tb/10287
Nor did they find much hard evidence that effective treatment for apnea -- primarily continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and surgery to enlarge the pharyngeal airway -- reduces rates of cardiovascular disease or mortality.


They identified several observational studies that found reductions in sleep apnea symptoms reduced subsequent rates of cardiovascular events such as MI. But, Dr. Somers and colleagues said, "there are no randomized trials of the effects of treatment of obstructive sleep apnea on risk of developing coronary artery disease, risk of myocardial infarction, or risk of cardiovascular death."


For other conditions such as end-stage renal disease, no studies of any kind have been conducted on whether apnea treatment affects the course of the comorbid condition.


Central sleep apnea is most common in elderly men, the committee found, with a prevalence of 5% to 12% in men older than 65. Heart failure appears to increase the prevalence to upwards of 20%, according to several studies.


Dr. Somers and colleagues found no randomized trials of therapy for central sleep apnea in patients with heart failure. Consequently, they said, "there is no consensus as to whether central sleep apnea should be treated and, if so, what the optimal therapeutic strategy may be."
Bottom line should be: MORE STUDIES NEEDED NOW!!!

But I haven't seen the complete study. I would be interested in whether they tracked treatment compliance.

jnk
Last edited by jnk on Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Billmanweh
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:04 pm
Location: TX

Post by Billmanweh » Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:32 am

Maybe I should consider taking up a religion

Guest

Don't Jump to Conclusions

Post by Guest » Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:47 am

Well, I tend not to place much credence on medical reports that do not appear in medical journals. But I've responded to similar reports before, so I'll keep it short. I'm one of those in the "older men" category, so this report is especially troubling for us. Also, my apnea has gotten worse with age (I'm going tonight for another sleep study, with was prescribed after I did the last home test). But something is puzzling about this report, if I read it correctly. They concluded that "moderate" OSA gave rise to a sixfold increase in deaths, but then they reported that in the Wisconsin report, that the researchers found a three-fold increase in deaths in those with "severe" apnea. How can that be? Then if some of these men were up to 65 years old, then why would they follow-up on them for 15 years? The life expectancy in the U.S. is 75 for men and 80 for women. Also remember from your basic stat courses that relationships between two variables (for example heart disease and OSA) does imply a causative relationship - that is that one causes the other. I'd have to see more details of how the test was done before I jump to conclusions. (I'm a retired math instructor, so I've had some experience with this)

Guest

Post by Guest » Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:56 am

Guest,
DOES imply a causative relationship? How about does NOT imply ...

ThatMaskedMan

jnk
Posts: 5784
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:03 pm

Not a jumper

Post by jnk » Mon Aug 04, 2008 11:06 am

Although I find the wording of the articles depressing, all the articles say, in my opinion, is that there isn't yet enough statistical proof that treatment is good. And all that tells me is that more data is needed--not that the treatment isn't any good.

I have decided to be comfortable without solid data (since we have no choice) and to go on the common-sense notion that sleeping and breathing are good for me, and not sleeping and not breathing would be bad. And I believe that to be true of everyone, everywhere, whatever their condition. I don't need a double-blind peer-reviewed whatever to know that.

jnk

User avatar
DreamDiver
Posts: 3082
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:19 am

Re: Don't Jump to Conclusions

Post by DreamDiver » Mon Aug 04, 2008 11:38 am

Guest wrote:Well, I tend not to place much credence on medical reports that do not appear in medical journals.
Most people don't read the medical journals. Most people just skim the paper or skim the web. The subtitle implies the opposite of what the over-all article concludes. This is poor editing - not editorial license.

Worse, it's a highly traveled media outlet. This is just one story about health that's been - as far as I'm concerned - botched. They've glossed over truths and implied the wrong conclusions in a story that will be mostly skimmed. The story has been 'FOX'ed. (As in FOX news - intentional interpretation to the worst conclusion simply to draw attention to an uncompelling article.)

Might as well be a macarena.


_________________
Mask: ResMed AirFit™ F20 Mask with Headgear + 2 Replacement Cushions
Additional Comments: Pressure: APAP 10.4 | 11.8 | Also Quattro FX FF, Simplus FF

Guest

Post by Guest » Mon Aug 04, 2008 11:41 am

You are right, MaskedMan, I did forget the word "Not". I am sorry. That's because I'm sleeping, if lucky, about 5 hours. The mind must be going.