nih on flow limitation

Oh, SNAP!
TASmart, you de man!

TASmart wrote:Interesting article, however, the source is misrepresented. It is an article from Sleep Science the journal of the Brazilian Sleep Association

Your comment is also IMO "misleading".

Yes the article had "Peer review under responsibility of Brazilian Association of Sleep.". But to me the more interesting thing is who wrote it. Some guys from: Stanford University Sleep Medicine Division, Redwood City, California, USA

The world of academic publishing is sufficiently crazy that I'm not surprised that American researchers found it expedient to publish in a foreign Journal.

I never intended it to be misleading, sorry if you saw it that way. Further, the guy from Stanford is considered one of the leading authorities in Sleep APnea research. But I stand on my premise that a claimed Ph.D., PE, and English masters" certificate holder" should know better than to claim a US government agency is saying something that the only relationship of that paper's conclusions to the US government is that it was found using Pub Med. A trained academic clearly knows this and is either sloppy beyond belief or deliberately deceptive to give strength to his argument. Which is up to each reader to determine, or to totally ignore as the mood strikes them.

xxyzx wrote:

TASmart wrote:I correct inaccuracies, and I challenge xxyzx to show one lie in any post I made.

you waste your time on irrelevant trivial things that have no significance

you do it to be an asshole libturd by stalking me and also insulting me in past posts

Actually, TASmart is more polite to you than most. A lot of people take needless potshots at you, but TASmart does NOT. TASmart does exactly what he says he does (and what you've told people they need to do) - corrects your posts, whether it be "trivial" as you put it or something very significant and important. He does not attack you on a personal level.

I believe you DO see that, but choose to flip flop between being a bully yourself and a victim.

Most people here have chosen to ignore you. But anybody with a lick of common sense gets really frustrated with some of your posts. It's not that all your posts are inaccurate, because they are not. But your attitude really sucks and that makes it impossible to "hear" you, even when what you say is accurate.

There goes xxyzx insulting me again when I have done nothing to warrant such abuse. But I will continue to note his errors and omissions.

TASmart wrote:There goes xxyzx insulting me again when I have done nothing to warrant such abuse. But I will continue to note his errors and omissions.

Agreed.

The thing is, xxyzx is being super ignorant as to how he is being perceived. Whether he just can't see it or really doesn't give a crap, NOBODY here takes him seriously. Even when/if he has good information to share, people dismiss him because of his attitude and demeanor.

What makes me want to beat my head against the wall is that he the epitome of everything he complains about in others! How can he not see that?

There is none so blind as those that refuse to see.....

It's too bad somebody that knows him IRL can't see this and smack him upside the head with a frying pan. Maybe a person he cares about could talk some sense into him...

But probably not. People like him tend not to listen to anybody about anything.

As long as he is busy on the internet, he is not annoying family members.
Who in their right mind would mess with a good thing?
IRL, I would certainly let him be, and pretend he is being "harmless".

xxyzx wrote:

Madalot wrote:

TASmart wrote:There goes xxyzx insulting me again when I have done nothing to warrant such abuse. But I will continue to note his errors and omissions.

Agreed.

The thing is, xxyzx is being super ignorant as to how he is being perceived. Whether he just can't see it or really doesn't give a crap, NOBODY here takes him seriously. Even when/if he has good information to share, people dismiss him because of his attitude and demeanor.

What makes me want to beat my head against the wall is that he the epitome of everything he complains about in others! How can he not see that?

There is none so blind as those that refuse to see.....

It's too bad somebody that knows him IRL can't see this and smack him upside the head with a frying pan. Maybe a person he cares about could talk some sense into him...

But probably not. People like him tend not to listen to anybody about anything.

========

i dont care what you libtards think or say

Yeah, we get that. But what you DON'T get is that comments like this are what make people here DISREGARD anything you say, whether it's accurate or not. What part of that don't you understand? Nobody here is going to take your word for anything. You've made sure of that through your nastiness and name calling.

Because nobody pays you any serious attention so why do you bother posting?

Why do you participate here? What do you get out of it other than an avenue to spew your nastiness? Is that all you want from this forum? An venue to spew your nastiness and hatred?

xxyzx wrote: tasmart = madalot = palerider = lsat
you never see more than one of those names at a time
as the troll has to bother signing off and signing on again to make the switch

Wrong again. All 4 of us are different. I only use "madalot" and never have been any of the other three. And nobody else logs in as "madalot." Just me.

You cannot derail the truth with your lunatic ravings. And they are crazy crazy crazy.

xxyzx wrote:tasmart = madalot = palerider = lsat
you never see more than one of those names at a time
as the troll has to bother signing off and signing on again to make the switch

Ooooh... the things you don't know! Each of the names you mentioned is a different person, living in a different state, all with distinctly different personalities. You keep saying that... but it doesn't make it true. Actually, YOU sound like one particular person here. However, he/s is the L word you keep using... and it's hard to imagine that anyone can go from being a WS to a L in the space of half an hour.

xxyzx wrote: tasmart = madalot = palerider = lsat
you never see more than one of those names at a time
as the troll has to bother signing off and signing on again to make the switch

Sorry, genius. Palerider is logged in right now, as am I. Two, different people/login id's.

gebo, Goofproof, Madalot, palerider, RicaLynn, xxyzx and 40 guests

This is what the bottom looks like RIGHT NOW. I took myself off of "hide" to show that I'm logged in as is PR (among others including alphabet guy)....

We're NOT the same person....

Madalot wrote:gebo, Goofproof, Madalot, palerider, RicaLynn, xxyzx and 40 guests

This is what the bottom looks like RIGHT NOW. I took myself off of "hide" to show that I'm logged in as is PR (among others including alphabet guy)....

We're NOT the same person....

If fools could read it's been explained many time how the form works and why it's listed that way. It means NOTHING, keep posting about it anyway! Jim

Goofproof wrote:

Madalot wrote:gebo, Goofproof, Madalot, palerider, RicaLynn, xxyzx and 40 guests

This is what the bottom looks like RIGHT NOW. I took myself off of "hide" to show that I'm logged in as is PR (among others including alphabet guy)....

We're NOT the same person....

If fools could read it's been explained many time how the form works and why it's listed that way. It means NOTHING, keep posting about it anyway! Jim

If I'm understanding correctly, what people have been posting about is the "also posted as" to the LEFT. That is totally meaningless.

The bottom does show those members who are logged in that CHOOSE to show it. The option exists to hide your login, which I usually do.

If I'm misunderstanding you, then apologies. But the "also posted as" and the "users browsing the forum" are different. I believe the latter IS accurate.

I usually do not hide.
Comparing the two listings show us how ABSOLUTELY USELESS the "also posted as . . . " list is.
I rather hope that dropping the "feature" is one of the planned upgrades.