Respironics M Series Auto Bi-pap....
Respironics M Series Auto Bi-pap....
Anyone know when this will be released in the M Series form factor?
Last edited by Paul B on Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Guest
The above was me. Checking, just out of curiosity, to see whether cpaptalk.com currently displays an IP address as a guest post is submitted. Didn't see it anywhere. But that's an altogether different topic, in a thread about guest posting by Johnny. Sorry for the distraction...
We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread.
We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread.
Thanks, Paul. The one pattern I've noticed in the past is that Respironics seems to platform-evolve sequentially: from simplest platform, to next simplest platform, working their way up the complexity ladder. I guess AutoBiPAP should be coming up to bat any time now for an M-Series physical redesign.
Of course, that may mean next year. Hopefully someone will know.
Of course, that may mean next year. Hopefully someone will know.
That's easy, get a bigger hammer. May have a problem shrinking the heavy duty blower required for Bi-pap. It's hard to find a little squirrel, that can run that fast. Jim
Use data to optimize your xPAP treatment!
"The art of medicine consists in amusing the patient while nature cures the disease." Voltaire
"The art of medicine consists in amusing the patient while nature cures the disease." Voltaire
- NightHawkeye
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:55 am
- Location: Iowa - The Hawkeye State
I gotta question the entire article, guys. It strikes me as ResMed influenced. First, BiPAP is a Respironics trademark. Nowhere in the article does it suggest that bilevel machines exhibit the same problems as BiPAP machines. And the last sentence is a gem:Paul B wrote:Snoredog,
Very interesting article. Thank for sending it.
"For patients who cannot tolerate CPAP because of dyspnea, he suggested trying an exhalation pressure relief device before switching the patient to BiPAP."
Now, while exhalation pressure relief is used generically in the sentence, EPR just happens to be a ResMed trademark. The kicker to all this though is that CPAP exhalation pressure relief only comes in two forms; EPR, which is identical to BiPAP, and C-flex which has some BiPAP similarities. If the author thought C-flex provided benefits, then he should have said so. Instead, he suggested switching to EPR which has all the same problems as BiPAP. So, either the author is a moron, or he has an agenda.
If this were a legitimate article, the author would have steered clear of the use of common trademarks. Anyone with even slight familiarity with these machines knows that both BiPAP and Exhalation Pressure Relief are trademarked terms.
Regards,
Bill
-
Infobabe




