GSDgrl82 wrote:... no REM sleep
... I feel like with such little sleep this may not be 100% accurate results, I thought they needed at least two hours?
One suspects that you did not get into a deep enough stage of sleep to record some much higher AHI, thus there might be a possibility of a more severe OSA than recorded.
I'll share a bit of personal experience that you might find useful. As with many here, my titrated AHI from a full night's study was "up there". Then, after getting an APAP with data capability, I used the nightly results to adjust my therapeutic pressures to optimize my treated AHI. Nothing new, this is a common practice among us. My sleep doc was fine w my optimizing my pressures, btw (not all are.)
My (APAP therapy treated) average AHI is 0.2. I mention this for a reason. When I have that occasionally crummy night, say an AHI of 1.2, I feel measurably icky. And, this is my point. The notion of an AHI of 5 being acceptable is wrong (and too high) for a lot of patients. I suspect that 5 is an arbitrary number, and I would argue that anything even near 5 is likely worth treating.
So, two considerations:
1. You might not have a sufficient duration of sleep for the study; and,
2. Even if 5.1 is correct, you might derive significant health benefits from xpap therapy.
Oh, and one other consideration: We are not physicians. Treat all posts with advice from total strangers online with major caution (including this one.)