flightco wrote:Lucyhere wrote:hobbs wrote:
The worst part is that he will get away with doing this, along with staying involved in his "businesses", which is illegal. SMH
Lucy, mind quoting the law that says it is illegal? I don't believe it is. Kind of like the nominee showing his taxes, many have done it, but it is not a law and in spite of the fact the media were pulling their collective hair out; Trump just didn't play.
According to this NY Times article, Flightco, it looks likes you are mostly right:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/26/us/po ... iness.html
""Federal law does not prevent Mr. Trump from taking actions that could benefit him and his family financially; the president is exempt from most conflict-of-interest laws. But the Constitution, through what is called the emoluments clause, appears to prohibit him from taking payments or gifts from a foreign government entity, a standard that some legal experts say he may violate by renting space in Trump Tower in New York to the Bank of China or if he hosts foreign diplomats in one of his hotels.""
However, just because it may not be illegal, doesn't the mean the implications of having conflicts of interests wouldn't be huge as the article points out.
""Several of Mr. Trump’s real estate ventures in India — where he has more projects underway than in any location outside North America — are being built through companies with family ties to India’s most important political party. This makes it more likely that Indian government officials will do special favors benefiting Mr. Trump’s projects, including pressuring state-owned banks to extend favorable loans.""
And Flightco, even if what Trump is doing isn't illegal, if roles were reversed and it was Hillary who had all these conflicts of interest and had refused to pay her taxes, would you be ok with that? I seriously doubt it.
49er
PS - After I posted my initial message, I found this article in the guardian that talks about a constitutional crisis if he doesn't resolve the conflict of interest issues. It talks about how his Presidency could be in jeopardy as a result.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... nal-crisis
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/26/us/po ... iness.html