Should Trump Jump Up?

flightco wrote:

SleepyMcgee wrote:

PEF wrote:

SleepyMcgee wrote:[Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Still playing fast and loose with the facts, ugh, FIBBERmagee??? 13% of black males voted for Trump which is rather high for a white male Presidential candidate.

Dare you to show anything in my statement that wasn't factual.

Double dog actually.

Now... as for your inaccuracies:

"Trump fared little better among blacks and Hispanics than Romney did four years ago, Hillary Clinton did not run as strongly among these core Democratic groups as Obama did in 2012. Clinton held an 80-point advantage among blacks (88% to 8%) compared with Obama’s 87-point edge four years ago (93% to 6%). In 2008, Obama had a 91-point advantage among blacks." PEW RESEARCH CENTER

(I know i know facts = bullying)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Interesting but not relevant.

Facts are relevant to some of us...it's been clear, for a LONG time, trumpeteers have no desire for factual conversations though. I get it. That said, it's certainly one of the most stunning revelations from this election cycle though.

BTW PEF, I'm still waiting...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SleepyMcgee wrote:

flightco wrote:

SleepyMcgee wrote:

PEF wrote:

SleepyMcgee wrote:[Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Still playing fast and loose with the facts, ugh, FIBBERmagee??? 13% of black males voted for Trump which is rather high for a white male Presidential candidate.

Dare you to show anything in my statement that wasn't factual.

Double dog actually.

Now... as for your inaccuracies:

"Trump fared little better among blacks and Hispanics than Romney did four years ago, Hillary Clinton did not run as strongly among these core Democratic groups as Obama did in 2012. Clinton held an 80-point advantage among blacks (88% to 8%) compared with Obama’s 87-point edge four years ago (93% to 6%). In 2008, Obama had a 91-point advantage among blacks." PEW RESEARCH CENTER

(I know i know facts = bullying)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Interesting but not relevant.

Facts are relevant to some of us...it's clear trumpeteers have no desire for factual conversations though. I get it.

BTW PEF, I'm still waiting...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What I was saying was; HRC winning the popular vote is interesting and fun to talk about, but we don't elect on the popular vote, Trump didn't run to win the popular vote; therefore, it is interesting conversation but totally not relevant, Trump is the President Elect and no conversation will change that - but enjoy yourself, hopefully it will help you heal.

flightco wrote:

SleepyMcgee wrote:

flightco wrote:

SleepyMcgee wrote:

PEF wrote: Still playing fast and loose with the facts, ugh, FIBBERmagee??? 13% of black males voted for Trump which is rather high for a white male Presidential candidate.

Dare you to show anything in my statement that wasn't factual.

Double dog actually.

Now... as for your inaccuracies:

"Trump fared little better among blacks and Hispanics than Romney did four years ago, Hillary Clinton did not run as strongly among these core Democratic groups as Obama did in 2012. Clinton held an 80-point advantage among blacks (88% to 8%) compared with Obama’s 87-point edge four years ago (93% to 6%). In 2008, Obama had a 91-point advantage among blacks." PEW RESEARCH CENTER

(I know i know facts = bullying)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Interesting but not relevant.

Facts are relevant to some of us...it's clear trumpeteers have no desire for factual conversations though. I get it.

BTW PEF, I'm still waiting...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What I was saying was; HRC winning the popular vote is interesting and fun to talk about, but we don't elect on the popular vote, Trump didn't run to win the popular vote; therefore, it is interesting conversation but totally not relevant, Trump is the President Elect and no conversation will change that - but enjoy yourself, hopefully it will help you heal.

My apologies. I didn't know that we were only allowed to discuss pre approved topics.

I'll check the sticky. Thanks for the heads up!!

Btw, I'm a white middle age dude that is about to get a massive tax cut. All good here under the trumpy mctwitter war presidency.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Two choices, change the law of the land to elect by popular vote, or move to a nice country you can stand that elects leaders by popular vote, either one will involve you to make a change, rioting won't do more than destroy others property and rights, except get you on T.V., and raise their ratings, and dumping down our views of people. Jim

Goofproof wrote:Two choices, change the law of the land to elect by popular vote, or move to a nice country you can stand that elects leaders by popular vote, either one will involve you to make a change, rioting won't do more than destroy others property and rights, except get you on T.V., and raise their ratings, and dumping down our views of people. Jim

THIS POST HAS BEEN DEEMED A NON RELEVANT TOPIC. PLEASE REVIEW PRE APPROVED TOPICS ON FAQ STICKY.

-THE MANAGEMENT

THIS MESSAGE WILL SELF DESTRUCT.

Goofproof wrote:Two choices, change the law of the land to elect by popular vote, or move to a nice country you can stand that elects leaders by popular vote...

Choice #1 has been underway for several years now. Election 2016 may propel it even further.
http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/

[quote="SleepyMcgeeWhat I was saying was; HRC winning the popular vote is interesting and fun to talk about, but we don't elect on the popular vote, Trump didn't run to win the popular vote; therefore, it is interesting conversation but totally not relevant, Trump is the President Elect and no conversation will change that - but enjoy yourself, hopefully it will help you heal.[/quote]

My apologies. I didn't know that we were only allowed to discuss pre approved topics.

I'll check the sticky. Thanks for the heads up!!

Btw, I'm a white middle age dude that is about to get a massive tax cut. All good here under the trumpy mctwitter war presidency.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

Funny, even after losing you still try to take what someone else has said and twist it to meet your own agenda. I never mentioned anything about approved or not approved. As a matter of fact, the OT was no longer being discussed. Folks were talking about DT being elected and you brought up the popular vote which is interesting, "but has no relevance whatsoever to the election" One side won, one side lost and you can try again in 4 years. You got on here a month ago apparently just to argue; I am done with you, you can go fight with yourself or someone else. My side won the election, my argument is over.

flightco wrote:[quote="SleepyMcgeeWhat I was saying was; HRC winning the popular vote is interesting and fun to talk about, but we don't elect on the popular vote, Trump didn't run to win the popular vote; therefore, it is interesting conversation but totally not relevant, Trump is the President Elect and no conversation will change that - but enjoy yourself, hopefully it will help you heal.

My apologies. I didn't know that we were only allowed to discuss pre approved topics.

I'll check the sticky. Thanks for the heads up!!

Btw, I'm a white middle age dude that is about to get a massive tax cut. All good here under the trumpy mctwitter war presidency.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

Funny, even after losing you still try to take what someone else has said and twist it to meet your own agenda. I never mentioned anything about approved or not approved. As a matter of fact, the OT was no longer being discussed. Folks were talking about DT being elected and you brought up the popular vote which is interesting, "but has no relevance whatsoever to the election" One side won, one side lost and you can try again in 4 years. You got on here a month ago apparently just to argue; I am done with you, you can go fight with yourself or someone else. My side won the election, my argument is over.[/quote]

Cool story!!

Pro tip: I wasn't fighting and don't have a 'side'. If you believe a bankrupt TV game show host that is due in court in 3 weeks makes a great president that's your call dude! I almost always vote R but didn't fall for this hucksters siren call.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Here he is arguing with himself...

SleepyMcgee wrote:My apologies. I didn't know that we were only allowed to discuss pre approved topics.

I'll check the sticky. Thanks for the heads up!!

SleepyMcgee wrote:Facts are relevant to some of us...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I SAW A SIGN ON THE BACK OF A CAR WINDOW A FEW MONTHS AGO IT READS HILLARY FOR PRISON

SleepyMcgee wrote:

Goofproof wrote:Two choices, change the law of the land to elect by popular vote, or move to a nice country you can stand that elects leaders by popular vote, either one will involve you to make a change, rioting won't do more than destroy others property and rights, except get you on T.V., and raise their ratings, and dumping down our views of people. Jim

THIS POST HAS BEEN DEEMED A NON RELEVANT TOPIC. PLEASE REVIEW PRE APPROVED TOPICS ON FAQ STICKY.

-THE MANAGEMENT

THIS MESSAGE WILL SELF DESTRUCT.

So much for QueenMcGee's, Ruling!

Let them eat Cake, Had mine with supper, it was good! Trump will put Cake on every table.

Guest wrote:Here he is arguing with himself...

SleepyMcgee wrote:My apologies. I didn't know that we were only allowed to discuss pre approved topics.

I'll check the sticky. Thanks for the heads up!!

SleepyMcgee wrote:Facts are relevant to some of us...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where did I say facts MUST be relevant to everyone and present in all posts? I cannot force trumpeteers to worry about pesky facts.

Come now.

Even I'm not that delusional!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SleepyMcgee wrote:Even I'm not that delusional!!

Not sure you will find anyone to agree with that.

SleepyMcgee wrote:Where did I say facts MUST be relevant to everyone and present in all posts? I cannot force trumpeteers to worry about pesky facts.

Well you did say...

SleepyMcgee wrote:You are entitled to your opinions but facts are facts.

SleepyMcgee wrote:I realize that facts and sources are the extreme rights kryptonite but...
Since when have facts been a bullying tactic?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SleepyMcgee wrote:Now...what facts did I get so wrong

SleepyMcgee wrote: I was stating very basic facts. More Americans voted against trump than voted for him.

flightco wrote:What I was saying was; HRC winning the popular vote is interesting and fun to talk about, but we don't elect on the popular vote, Trump didn't run to win the popular vote; therefore, it is interesting conversation but totally not relevant, Trump is the President Elect and no conversation will change that - but enjoy yourself, hopefully it will help you heal.

Want more facts?
You came here not to talk cpap, not to help anyone with a cpap or related problem. But to educate us on your political views. We got that now. You are not the HRC campaign manager (or are you?).
So go take your pumpkin spice flavored xanax and move on with your life. Hope you can.

Guest wrote:

SleepyMcgee wrote:Even I'm not that delusional!!

Not sure you will find anyone to agree with that.

SleepyMcgee wrote:Where did I say facts MUST be relevant to everyone and present in all posts? I cannot force trumpeteers to worry about pesky facts.

Well you did say...

SleepyMcgee wrote:You are entitled to your opinions but facts are facts.

SleepyMcgee wrote:I realize that facts and sources are the extreme rights kryptonite but...
Since when have facts been a bullying tactic?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SleepyMcgee wrote:Now...what facts did I get so wrong

SleepyMcgee wrote: I was stating very basic facts. More Americans voted against trump than voted for him.

flightco wrote:What I was saying was; HRC winning the popular vote is interesting and fun to talk about, but we don't elect on the popular vote, Trump didn't run to win the popular vote; therefore, it is interesting conversation but totally not relevant, Trump is the President Elect and no conversation will change that - but enjoy yourself, hopefully it will help you heal.

Want more facts?
You came here not to talk cpap, not to help anyone with a cpap or related problem. But to educate us on your political views. We got that now. You are not the HRC campaign manager (or are you?).
So go take your pumpkin spice flavored xanax and move on with your life. Hope you can.

Cool story!! But remember, just because I believe facts and gravity exist doesn't mean I can convince others they do.

Now...

Even though your incoherent rambling and quoting isn't relevant to any discussion being had, I won't slam you for it. Go nuts!

Dance for me and scour the forum for more quotes! Dance lol!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SleepyMcgee wrote:Dance for me and scour the forum for more quotes! Dance lol!

SleepyMcgee wrote: Even I'm not that delusional!!

SleepyMcgee wrote:Even though your incoherent rambling and quoting isn't relevant to any discussion being had, I won't slam you for it. Go nuts!

Dance for me and scour the forum for more quotes! Dance lol!

Maybe you are not aware all of those quotes were in this very thread.

But I do see that you have now at least posted in a thread that is not political. We'll see how that plays out or if you will go back to your other username.

And now...

SleepyMcgee wrote:Dance for me and scour the forum for more quotes! Dance lol!

btw - your next president in on TV now.