Sleep studies changed for ever?

General Discussion on any topic relating to CPAP and/or Sleep Apnea.
User avatar
Gerald?
Posts: 230
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:44 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Sleep studies changed for ever?

Post by Gerald? » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:24 pm

Interesting article on getting rid of the wires.

http://news.mit.edu/2017/new-ai-algorit ... waves-0807

No mention as to whether it will ever be rolled out.

Other interesting piece of information was that sleep specialists are generally only 80% accurate!

_________________
Mask: TAP PAP Nasal Pillow CPAP Mask with Improved Stability Mouthpiece
Additional Comments: Software: Sleepyhead

Bertha deBlues

Re: Sleep studies changed for ever?

Post by Bertha deBlues » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:32 pm

Thanks for the link, Gerald? It looks promising.

Bertha deBlues

Re: Sleep studies changed for ever?

Post by Bertha deBlues » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:46 pm

The 80% number is an eye-opener. From the article: "Using this approach in tests of 25 healthy volunteers, the researchers found that their technique was about 80 percent accurate, which is comparable to the accuracy of ratings determined by sleep specialists based on EEG measurements."

Hey, isn't this a prototype tricorder? Dr. McCoy would be proud.

SewTired
Posts: 1736
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 8:33 am
Location: Minneapolis area

Re: Sleep studies changed for ever?

Post by SewTired » Mon Aug 07, 2017 7:14 pm

Bertha deBlues wrote:The 80% number is an eye-opener. From the article: "Using this approach in tests of 25 healthy volunteers, the researchers found that their technique was about 80 percent accurate, which is comparable to the accuracy of ratings determined by sleep specialists based on EEG measurements."

Hey, isn't this a prototype tricorder? Dr. McCoy would be proud.
You'd be surprised. A lot of medical equipment design was based on Star Trek episodes as the initial inspiration. yay!

_________________
Mask: AirFit™ P10 Nasal Pillow CPAP Mask with Headgear
Additional Comments: Sleepyhead
Diabetes 2, RLS & bradycardia
Airsense For Her; Settings: range 8-12, Airfit P10 (M)

Rob K
Posts: 642
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:22 pm

Re: Sleep studies changed for ever?

Post by Rob K » Mon Aug 07, 2017 7:43 pm

Using radio waves to monitor sleep. The first thing that came to my mind is that this technology is not new at all. This is exactly what the Resmed S+ sleep monitor does and it has been on the market for a while. Then I read the article and realized that they are not claiming to have invented the technology, just that they claim to have improved the accuracy to 80%. Hopefully sleep monitoring accuracy keeps improving. I have to agree that the wires in the sleep lab were quite annoying.

_________________
Machine: AirCurve™ 10 VAuto BiLevel Machine with HumidAir™ Heated Humidifier
Mask: AirFit™ N10 Nasal CPAP Mask with Headgear
Additional Comments: Resmed F10 Mask for colds. When camping on battery power I use P10 mask and PR 560p machine.

User avatar
Goofproof
Posts: 16082
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:16 pm
Location: Central Indiana, USA

Re: Sleep studies changed for ever?

Post by Goofproof » Mon Aug 07, 2017 7:45 pm

Bertha deBlues wrote:The 80% number is an eye-opener. From the article: "Using this approach in tests of 25 healthy volunteers, the researchers found that their technique was about 80 percent accurate, which is comparable to the accuracy of ratings determined by sleep specialists based on EEG measurements."

Hey, isn't this a prototype tricorder? Dr. McCoy would be proud.
Some day Dr. McCoy may give you a pill so you to can grow a new Kidney! Jim
Use data to optimize your xPAP treatment!

"The art of medicine consists in amusing the patient while nature cures the disease." Voltaire