-SWS wrote: I stand corrected. The above reference to a two-minute cartoon was not insinuation after all...
I agree with -SWS and Dr. Rapoport on the Provent thingy.
Provent is counterintuitive in many respects. But hey, if it helps some people, it helps. The science shows it helps some people A LOT.
Rapoport is very up-front with the fact that Provent is not a CPAP replacement in the sense of putting the CPAP companies out of business--but hey, what is, right? And Rapoport seemed genuinely surprised by how many people were helped by Provent when I heard him mention it at an A.W.A.K.E. meeting a while back.
As for his credibility on the subject, Rapoport's statement to the audience on Provent, and several other devices, when I heard him speak, was something along the lines of "Look, I made money from them myself, so don't believe a word I say." And those words forming that self-deprecating disclaimer were the very words that did much to make me trust his words all the more.
I can't say I agreed with every word out of his mouth. I didn't like the idea of less-than-4-cm CPAP during wake, for example, which was something else he was involved in with a different company. (Just sounded uncomfortable to me.) But, -SWS, Rapoport is as awesome in person as he is in print, IMO, with or without touted credentials. If he says "check this out; it helps people," it is ALWAYS worth checking out.
Thanks for your posts in this thread, -SWS. Big time. (And that is NOT sarcasm on my part. Although, I must say, yours, above, to the chimp of the night, still has me laughing. )