Estimating CPAP Pressure Requirement
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:55 pm
Estimating CPAP Pressure Requirement
I happened across an interesting formula in a medical journal article [1] I was reading. It gives an estimation equation for the pressure required in CPAP treatment. Here's the formula (units in centimeters):
Pressure = -5.12 + (0.13*BMI) + (0.16*Neck Circumference) + (0.04*AHI)
It might be neat to run this calculation using your own BMI and neck circumference along with the AHI estimated from your baseline sleep study. Then you could compare the predicted pressure with the pressure that you actually used when you started CPAP therapy. Mine works out to between 6cm and 7cm so it will be interesting to see if that's what my titration study came up with. Actually, that would be nice since that's a lower pressure than many people apparently have to sleep with.
[1] Series F. and I. Marc (1997). "Efficacy of Automatic Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy That Uses an Estimated Required Pressure in the Treatment of the Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome". Annals of Internal Medicine.
Pressure = -5.12 + (0.13*BMI) + (0.16*Neck Circumference) + (0.04*AHI)
It might be neat to run this calculation using your own BMI and neck circumference along with the AHI estimated from your baseline sleep study. Then you could compare the predicted pressure with the pressure that you actually used when you started CPAP therapy. Mine works out to between 6cm and 7cm so it will be interesting to see if that's what my titration study came up with. Actually, that would be nice since that's a lower pressure than many people apparently have to sleep with.
[1] Series F. and I. Marc (1997). "Efficacy of Automatic Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy That Uses an Estimated Required Pressure in the Treatment of the Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome". Annals of Internal Medicine.
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:55 pm
- wading thru the muck!
- Posts: 2799
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:42 am
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:55 pm
Well Mucky, for the people in the study I cited the formula tended to either be correct or underestimate them by a couple cm so it sounds like you and TH pretty much bracketed the usual range of results. Look at it this way, with the $5,000 you save on sleep study you can buy a really nice APAP.
Note: Just Kidding! Lest anyone think I posted the formula because I don't think you need an actual diagnosis...no way.[/i]
Note: Just Kidding! Lest anyone think I posted the formula because I don't think you need an actual diagnosis...no way.[/i]
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:34 pm
- Location: Kentucky, United States of America
- Contact:
This is an interesting formula and is exactly where my PAP setting was configured in 1999 @ 8cm H2O.
Height = 6'7", Weight = 280, BMI = 31.5, Neck = 18 inches or 45.72 cm, AHI=50.5, so
1. Pressure = -5.12 + (0.13*31.5) + (0.16*45.72) + (0.04*50.5)
2. Pressure = -5.12 + (4.095) + (7.3152) + (2.02)
3. Pressure = 8.3102 cm H2O
That's nice, but I still had an AHI of 22 with a pressure setting of 10!
I'm currently on BiPAP with 16 iPAP and 12 ePAP and it's working well
I like this formula though!
Thanks!
Height = 6'7", Weight = 280, BMI = 31.5, Neck = 18 inches or 45.72 cm, AHI=50.5, so
1. Pressure = -5.12 + (0.13*31.5) + (0.16*45.72) + (0.04*50.5)
2. Pressure = -5.12 + (4.095) + (7.3152) + (2.02)
3. Pressure = 8.3102 cm H2O
That's nice, but I still had an AHI of 22 with a pressure setting of 10!
I'm currently on BiPAP with 16 iPAP and 12 ePAP and it's working well
I like this formula though!
Thanks!
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:55 pm
It is pretty cool. I do this stuff for a living and when something gets published like that it usually works for like 90% of the people in a similar population to the one they used to develop the formula (if it didn't work that well it wouldn't have been published and cited).
Of course anything that's just a regression equation fitted to a whole population is going to have a few people where it doesn't work at all. But on the other hand, there will be a few people who have a full-night titration study and end up with a totally wrong effective pressure measurement. Nothing like this is ever quite so cut-and-dried and "scientific" as it seems.
Of course anything that's just a regression equation fitted to a whole population is going to have a few people where it doesn't work at all. But on the other hand, there will be a few people who have a full-night titration study and end up with a totally wrong effective pressure measurement. Nothing like this is ever quite so cut-and-dried and "scientific" as it seems.
- wading thru the muck!
- Posts: 2799
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:42 am
th,th wrote:Brent, Thanks for posting this. This is amazing how many people this works for.......... You know I never did see any sleep equipment at the sleep lab I went to. I bet there was only a tech in the next room with a $2 calculator doing my titration
th
This is exactly what I was thinking.
...maybe we need to open the cpaptalk "virtual sleep lab."
Sincerely,
wading thru the muck of the sleep study/DME/Insurance money pit!
wading thru the muck of the sleep study/DME/Insurance money pit!
-
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 3:15 am