I would actually think they'd have more feelings about this than those of us who weren't around during that time.chrisp wrote:RG, SWS and other old timers that participated in the Surly Abond Saga please don't read this. Its not about you.
Well, I don't know about the "good faith" part... but I believe you that you didn't do it TO embarrass anyone. Just bored and having some fun, huh?It was all done in good faith not to embarrass anyone.
You seem to be ignoring Rested Gal's posts indicating she has some negative feelings about what you did (if judging by her Smilies/emoticons, anger is one of them, and I imagine a host of other feelings).So all the threads of valuable information are suddenly void. Why? Because a few high and mighty that weren't even around when this went on are full of yourselves.
YOU didn't show how knowledgeable, caring, patient, and intuitive she is--SHE did.How did I embarrass RG? By showing how knowledgible, caring, patient and intuitive she is. A great communicator!
She didn't say she was embarrassed, so I don't know if she was or not. I can only say that personally I do not like to be deceived and manipulated, and one of the reasons it makes me so angry is that being fooled makes me feel foolish. But that's just me.
Again, you're ignoring the feedback you've gotten from the people who were affected directly, and instead you're complaining that those who weren't affected directly have an opinion about what you did. If you're not interested with the latter group thinks, then spend more time addressing the former group, to whom I feel you owe more than just a brush off and saying that everyone benefited from your deception, including those who conveyed to you that they feel they wasted their time helping someone who didn't need help.You get a life.
I hope you're not conveying those values to your children.I should have just let it be and you would still be praising my friend Surly in India.