When I read the original post, I was thinking along the lines of what the Social Security Administration considers disabled, not ADA. And it does depend on WHY the question was being asked as to which definition should be utilized.snuginarug wrote:Although I agree that OSA that is treated is not a disability, I do have to weigh in on the definition of disability. A person can be disabled for a time, receive a new treatment or succeed with an ongoing treatment, and then be able to work and enjoy an unhampered life. My definition of what is and what is not a disability is based on the ADA definition. By that definition, it is possible to be disabled at one point and get better at another. Also, being paralyzed or needing a wheel chair... these are not the only disabilities that "count." There are lots of invisible disabilities.mattman wrote:Considering how easy it is to treat sleep apnea and the fact that, with said treatment pretty much all symptoms go away, I would never call this a disability.
To me, a disability is something that cannot be made to go away. Being paralyzed is a disability.
The Social Security Administration does NOT consider a person disabled if there is a possibility of improvement or the disability could be considered temporary. A person that is disabled has to be able to prove, with sound medical documentation, that they have exhausted any available treatments and not improved OR that their condition is permanent with no possible treatment to alleviate the symptoms that are causing the disability.
And let me tell you -- even if you have something that by all SSA definitions IS a disability, it's still an uphill struggle to get disability.