Covering anti-asphyxiation port -- Hybrid ?

General Discussion on any topic relating to CPAP and/or Sleep Apnea.
User avatar
tillymarigold
Posts: 426
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Covering anti-asphyxiation port -- Hybrid ?

Post by tillymarigold » Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:09 pm

Is it a really, really bad idea to put tape over the anti-asphyxiation port on the Hybrid? Not the line of holes that you exhale through, but the round two-part whole in the elbow that's supposed to keep you from suffocating if you lose power.

http://www.respcare.com/hybrid/images/f ... _image.jpg

The little rubber stopper that's supposed to cover the port when the air goes through it ... doesn't. It doesn't really seal over the AA port so air blows out through the port and it makes a whistling noise. The only way to stop the noise is to cover the port with something. Sometimes if I cover it with my hand for a few seconds, I can build up a pressure vacuum and when I let go, it presses more tightly against the hole, but that doesn't always work and almost never works all night.

Two nights ago I was so frustrated with it that I took some paper tape (that was in my nightstand from when I used to tape instead of using a FF mask) and covered the port, and that finally fixed it. I feel like I can get enough air through the exhalation holes if necessary (like I'm fine for the few seconds after I put on the mask and before I turn on the machine) and I'll probably wake up if the machine shuts off.

I felt like I slept really well the last couple nights but today I have a pretty bad headache so I'm wondering if I was re-breathing CO2. On the other hand, the exhalation holes should be enough to vent the CO2, right? So covering the anti-asphyxiation port shouldn't affect venting--in fact, the mask *shouldn't* vent through it.

Thoughts?

_________________

CPAPopedia Keywords Contained In This Post (Click For Definition): seal, Power


neverbetter
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: NY, Miami, London

Post by neverbetter » Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:25 pm

If you bought your Hybrid more than 90 days ago, your due for a new one. the code is K0553
It's better to get a new one than mess with it.

User avatar
tillymarigold
Posts: 426
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Post by tillymarigold » Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:20 pm

neverbetter wrote:If you bought your Hybrid more than 90 days ago, your due for a new one. the code is K0553
It's better to get a new one than mess with it.
It's less than 90 days and my insurance doesn't pay for my treatment and I don't have $150 to spare right now.

Anyway, I thought it was 6 months for a mask, only 3 months for the pillows. And this has been a problem for as long as I've had the mask.

User avatar
darthlucy
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Milford, CT

Post by darthlucy » Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:32 pm

tillymarigold wrote:
neverbetter wrote:If you bought your Hybrid more than 90 days ago, your due for a new one. the code is K0553
It's better to get a new one than mess with it.
It's less than 90 days and my insurance doesn't pay for my treatment and I don't have $150 to spare right now.

Anyway, I thought it was 6 months for a mask, only 3 months for the pillows. And this has been a problem for as long as I've had the mask.
Varies greatly between companies, and even between policies within companies. My otherwise super-duper policy paid for my machine but doesn't cover masks at all. Ever.

_________________
Mask
Lisa

Joined the Hosehead Brigade on June 22, 2007

User avatar
Nodzy
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: Planet Mirth - But not too close to the edge.

Post by Nodzy » Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:49 pm

Whoa... covering, sealing over, the AA port on the Hybrid could be dangerous to deadly.

The lack of backpressure to seal the flapper to the AA port opening when the unit is in use could be caused by one or more factors: your brand and model of machine and mode of operation, your lower (or only) pressure setting, a combination of those, or flapper damage or wear.

I know that with the Respironics M-series in A-FLEX mode the lower pressure has to be above 8cm H2O, at least on my Revision-B mask shell. A Revision-C mask shell is supposed to be delivered to me today -- I hope it gets here.

The Revision-C mask shell has smaller diameter passive vent ports (the six vent ports across the front of the shell above the inlet swivel tube), allowing for increased normal backpressure at all pressure-set ranges. That offsets much of the problem with using the mask with A-FLEX and EPR xPAP's... so I am told by the Innomed folks. But, the smaller diameter passive vent ports supposedly do not create a re-breathing risk, and in fact. alleviate potential for that to occur.

If you need the info for Innomed to get a Revision-C shell PM me.

Image

User avatar
tillymarigold
Posts: 426
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Post by tillymarigold » Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:06 pm

Nodzy wrote:Whoa... covering, sealing over, the AA port on the Hybrid could be dangerous to deadly.

The lack of backpressure to seal the flapper to the AA port opening when the unit is in use could be caused by one or more factors: your brand and model of machine and mode of operation, your lower (or only) pressure setting, a combination of those, or flapper damage or wear.

I know that with the Respironics M-series in A-FLEX mode the lower pressure has to be above 8cm H2O, at least on my Revision-B mask shell. A Revision-C mask shell is supposed to be delivered to me today -- I hope it gets here.

The Revision-C mask shell has smaller diameter passive vent ports (the six vent ports across the front of the shell above the inlet swivel tube), allowing for increased normal backpressure at all pressure-set ranges. That offsets much of the problem with using the mask with A-FLEX and EPR xPAP's... so I am told by the Innomed folks. But, the smaller diameter passive vent ports supposedly do not create a re-breathing risk, and in fact. alleviate potential for that to occur.

If you need the info for Innomed to get a Revision-C shell PM me.
I think you're misunderstanding what I'm asking. I am NOT covering the six small vent holes. I'm covering the large hole in the elbow that is *supposed* to be closed when the mask is in use. So if the six small vent holes should be enough to prevent re-breathing, why would it be "dangerous to deadly" to cover the other hole?

My shell is Revision E and my lower pressure on my 420E is 8.


tooly125
Posts: 410
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:27 pm
Location: CT
Contact:

Post by tooly125 » Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:54 pm

It is a really bad idea to cover the large hole in the elbow of the mask.
If for any reason your machine stops working you run the risk of suffocation.
The six holes only prevent re-breathing when the machine is on and air is blowing through them.
Call whoever you bought the mask from and if they can't help you call the hybrids customer service.
Don't mess around covering the large hole, it may be a rare chance something will happen but it's definitely not a chance you should take.
Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body totally worn out and screaming,WOO HOO what a ride!