
I don't know where they got that "Adaption phase 40 minutes" for AdaptSV, it takes a heckuva lot less time than that.
That mask recommendation thing is screwy too. AdaptSV has the options for 4 masks, and other masks could very well be quite acceptable. But I very seriously doubt that ANY ASV machine will work with interfaces with significant restrictions (like a pillows-type of deal).
And leaks? Adapt SV runs quite well in the face of leaks more than 24 LPM (and that must be in addition to Exhaust Rate, which has got to be 30-35 LPM anyway).
Yeah, lotta mode, pressure and rate options for BiPAP SV.
I'm thinking we're gonna need a head-to-head, looking specifically at the ability of each machine to address the other 's failure to manage-- and I'm talking patients, not events, because I'll bet that BiPAP SV will have the same difficulty with Wake/1 transitions and poor sleep efficiency (creating unstable baselines) that AdaptSV has.
SAG