jnk... wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 12:04 pm
jstjohn wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 11:25 pm
I can't accept the argument that CPAP/BIPAP machines cannot be used, in some cases, to ventilate patients. Haven't we all seen the doctors explaining how, in the event that a ventilator is unavailable, a person periodically squeezing a rubber bag can be a substitute for a ventilator?
And I can't accept the argument that the band aid used after getting a shot can't be used, in some cases, to stop the bleeding of a severed limb. Haven't we all seen doctors explaining how, in the event of an emergency, you could use your leather belt as a stop-gap tourniquet and use a temporary bandage of cloth to help stop the bleeding if miles from civilization? So why not just use a band aid like is used after a shot if you can't get to a hospital for a few days with a severed limb? I mean, it's better than nothing, right?
I guess I could decide to do that to myself based on my rights to do whatever I want to my own body. But why would I post it to confuse others facing life-threatening issues needing responsible decisions?
Let docs make doc decisions. Let experimental researchers do experimental research with rigging machines every which way for emergencies. But only encourage others to use a home sleep-treatment machine to treat sleep at home. Don't plant ideas about
others deciding to use a home sleep-treatment machine for any of
their respiratory failures, severe pneumonias, or severed limbs, no matter how much you might want to talk theoretically on a public forum about your ideas for improper, unapproved, and likely meaningless uses of home CPAP just because it sounds similar to what is used for other more serious acute medical issues that come up in emergency rooms and ICUs.
Hey, just me.
First, I'm not encouraging anyone to do anything. The original topic of this thread, and the topic to which my post was directed, was the feasibility of converting a standard CPAP machine into something that could be used as a ventilator. We're talking about pushing air through a pipe, not about building a nuclear reactor. And before the deluge of negativity starts, I get that the high-tech ventilators have a high level of sophistication. But at the end of the day it's about moving air and oxygen through a pipe at a certain volume, pressure, and timing.
Mechanical ventilation goes back a long time, remember the iron lung? Crude, yes, primitive, yes compared to today's technology but it saved a lot of lives. I have never opened up a ventilator to see what's inside. But I would bet that the number of high tech parts is zero or near zero, and I suspect the total parts cost is maybe 2-3% of the selling price.
This is not about what any individual should do, it's simply a THEORETICAL discussion of the feasibility of adapting a device that exists today in large quantities to do the job of a similar device that is more high tech but not readily available. You know, like maybe if we were faced with a medical crisis?
The comments about 'everyone who needs a ventilator is getting one' (not your comment) are all well and good, right up until the time that the ventilators run out. That time will come in the next few weeks. Doctors in some areas will have to make tough decisions about who gets a ventilator and how long they are allowed to stay on it. To believe otherwise is naive.