Please help interpret data
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:27 am
Please help interpret data
Hi all - new guy here. Short version: Please help me understand some data we've collected from my wife's Dreamstation APAP and a CMS50E oximeter to prepare for a discussion with her sleep doctor. Please see typical pic attached. AHI from PSG ~30.
Wife never had any sleep complaints, sleep quality WORSE with machine. ONLY reason she uses it is fear of future stroke/heart problems. She's used it for 4 months.
-----
I suspect/fear those 3 or 4 large O2 desaturations are medically significant. I think the clearly corresponding heart rate increases are her body's response to low O2 (or high CO2), and represent exactly the stress that contributes to future problems.
Questions:
1) Is that true? Why/why not?
2) Can I expect sleep doc to take one look and say "We gotta fix that." If not, then what?
-----
-----
I suspect/fear the machine isn't really doing the job. APAP range is 4-20. I would hope the machine would be maxed out at 20 when she's in trouble - but it's not. OAs and Hyps are somewhat clustered during low O2 events, but it doesn't detect enough to get the pressure up enough. On the other hand, I suspect it detects too many events when she's first falling asleep and O2 levels are fine.
Questions:
3) Is our expectation that the machine will fix this (or be maxed out trying) appropriate?
4) Are there machine tunings (or other machines) that might help combat those low O2 events?
-----
Thanks for any insights you can offer!
Jim
Long version:
Background: My wife has never had any complaints about sleeping, but snored loudly and I've frequently heard apneic events. She doesn't recall ever waking up from one. She reported to her doctor, did home sleep study ->AHI 34 (BMI 27). PSG and CPAP titration at sleep center -> AHI 28, recommended pressure 11cm. Dr prescribed APAP machine, min 4 max 20cm which she's been using with an AirFit P10 nasal pillow and 100% compliance for ~4 months. 30 day AHI average is 8.8. She tries to not sleep on her back, and mostly sleeps on her side.
She very strongly dislikes the machine and perceives no immediate benefit (since she had no sleep complaints in the first place). She reports her sleep quality is reduced by having to use the machine. But she uses it religiously because she's been told of correlation of untreated apnea with increased risk of heart problems and stroke. That is very scary for her (and keeps her from throwing the machine out the window).
We got the oximeter 6 weeks ago and used it alongside the Dreamstation for a few weeks until the patterns were clear. I wore it for several nights after that, and saw pretty normal results (unlike hers). (I have no known significant apneas.)
OK - now for the questions! My understanding (please correct if wrong!) is that sleep apnea has two primary negative effects: 1) Interfering with sleep quality thru arousals or near-arousals; 2) Stress on the body (suspiciously correlated with heart and stroke problems) due to decreased blood O2 and increased CO2 from reduced breathing volume.
OXYGEN LEVELS
For my wife, 1) doesn't seem to be an issue, and certainly doesn't justify putting up with the machine. So we come to 2). Enter the oximeter data. (Note that we haven't calibrated the oximeter against a standard yet, but the magnitude of the O2 drops puts this way outside a calibration issue. And I think the high correlation of heart rate increase is further evidence that the events are real. Discussion is of course welcome.)
Since a common threshold for concern in O2 saturation level is 88%, and given that my wife's concern is for long term health, the fact that her level drops into the 70s for 5-20 minutes at a time a few times a night (while on the machine!) seems like a real cause for concern. Is that correct? Why/why not? Can I expect that showing her sleep doc that data will get him to take it seriously? And if not should we be concerned anyway?
The oximeter consistently shows a marked increase in heart rate during the O2 desaturation periods. Is it accurate to say this reflects the body's reaction of trying to pump more of that O2-poor blood so tissue doesn't suffer? And is the mechanism of that the release of stress hormones (or something) that is exactly the long term contributor to the heart/stroke health problems she fears? I'm really looking for an accurate understanding here.
Side question: Are those desaturation events likely during REM sleep? We don't have an EEG (yet), and so can't be certain of sleep stage, though the timings are plausibly REM. But with overall relaxation/paralysis during REM, might that exacerbate airway restriction and thus contribute to the problem? Are there mechanisms other than REM sleep that might explain the periodic O2 drops (and associated reduced breath volume)?
MACHINE CONCERNS
Starting on the plus side: The machine is clearly working. Her very frequent loud snoring is completely gone with the machine on. (Nice, but that's not what we're concerned about.) The oximeter baseline data also shows it's helping, and that is a good thing.
During the first maybe 20 minutes after going to sleep, the machine records enough events (mostly Hyps) to get her rolling AHI up to 10+ - although her O2 levels stay normal. Many of these look like periodic breathing, and might be just at the ragged edge of the machine's detection thresholds. I feel the machine is over-reporting here and making things look worse than they are to those who only look at AHI. Is that over-reporting interpretation justified?
When the machine was set for max pressure of 20 (it's down to 15 for reasons unclear to us), we never saw pressure above 15 (usually below 13). It looks like the machine isn't even trying to provide enough pressure to avoid the low O2 events. Looking for patterns over many days of data, there are more OA and Hs during the low O2 events, but it's not enough for the machine to figure out she's in trouble. So here it's arguably under-reporting apnea events and ignoring low breathing.
It seems like OA events result in more rapid pressure increases than Hyps. Does anyone with the $800 (!?) oximeter add-on notice that extended low O2 readings make it crank up the pressure even more/faster?
Looking at both breath-by-breath flow data and "minute ventilation" it's clear she's not getting nearly as much air during the low O2 events as during more normal times. So the real question is: Is it realistic to expect this "gold standard" therapy machine to actually keep her O2 levels close to normal?
LEAKS
While the machine reports only infrequent "large leaks", there are smaller leaks as the pressure increases. She breathes almost exclusively thru her nose, and pretty reliably keeps her mouth closed. But when the pressure is above maybe 10, it blows her lips apart for a noticeable leak. Leaks of 20-30 are common at these times, with 40 occasionally. A chin strap helps a little (to our surprise), but adds to the overall discomfort.
She tried the 3M micro pore tape once, with marginal improvement. We have some Somnifix strips on order.
Since the pressure usually gets up to 10-13 during the low O2 events, there is usually some leakage. The breath amplitude shown in the flow data is always lower at those times. One interpretation is that she's just breathing less - airway restriction or something. Another is that the machine's flow reporting accuracy is compromised a little due to the leaks. The question here is whether there's any observed history with the Dreamstation (500X110) of reduced flow report accuracy (actually reduced breath volume) with leaks in the 20-30 l/min range.
A concern if we did get the machine to provide substantially more pressure is that the parted lip leaks would become even more of a problem. A full face mask is the obvious answer to that, but stroke fears or not, there's serious question whether she'd accept that (for more than a few nights of testing). No questions here, just - ugh.
If anybody's still here, thanks for sticking it out. And again, any insights would be greatly appreciated.
Jim
Wife never had any sleep complaints, sleep quality WORSE with machine. ONLY reason she uses it is fear of future stroke/heart problems. She's used it for 4 months.
-----
I suspect/fear those 3 or 4 large O2 desaturations are medically significant. I think the clearly corresponding heart rate increases are her body's response to low O2 (or high CO2), and represent exactly the stress that contributes to future problems.
Questions:
1) Is that true? Why/why not?
2) Can I expect sleep doc to take one look and say "We gotta fix that." If not, then what?
-----
-----
I suspect/fear the machine isn't really doing the job. APAP range is 4-20. I would hope the machine would be maxed out at 20 when she's in trouble - but it's not. OAs and Hyps are somewhat clustered during low O2 events, but it doesn't detect enough to get the pressure up enough. On the other hand, I suspect it detects too many events when she's first falling asleep and O2 levels are fine.
Questions:
3) Is our expectation that the machine will fix this (or be maxed out trying) appropriate?
4) Are there machine tunings (or other machines) that might help combat those low O2 events?
-----
Thanks for any insights you can offer!
Jim
Long version:
Background: My wife has never had any complaints about sleeping, but snored loudly and I've frequently heard apneic events. She doesn't recall ever waking up from one. She reported to her doctor, did home sleep study ->AHI 34 (BMI 27). PSG and CPAP titration at sleep center -> AHI 28, recommended pressure 11cm. Dr prescribed APAP machine, min 4 max 20cm which she's been using with an AirFit P10 nasal pillow and 100% compliance for ~4 months. 30 day AHI average is 8.8. She tries to not sleep on her back, and mostly sleeps on her side.
She very strongly dislikes the machine and perceives no immediate benefit (since she had no sleep complaints in the first place). She reports her sleep quality is reduced by having to use the machine. But she uses it religiously because she's been told of correlation of untreated apnea with increased risk of heart problems and stroke. That is very scary for her (and keeps her from throwing the machine out the window).
We got the oximeter 6 weeks ago and used it alongside the Dreamstation for a few weeks until the patterns were clear. I wore it for several nights after that, and saw pretty normal results (unlike hers). (I have no known significant apneas.)
OK - now for the questions! My understanding (please correct if wrong!) is that sleep apnea has two primary negative effects: 1) Interfering with sleep quality thru arousals or near-arousals; 2) Stress on the body (suspiciously correlated with heart and stroke problems) due to decreased blood O2 and increased CO2 from reduced breathing volume.
OXYGEN LEVELS
For my wife, 1) doesn't seem to be an issue, and certainly doesn't justify putting up with the machine. So we come to 2). Enter the oximeter data. (Note that we haven't calibrated the oximeter against a standard yet, but the magnitude of the O2 drops puts this way outside a calibration issue. And I think the high correlation of heart rate increase is further evidence that the events are real. Discussion is of course welcome.)
Since a common threshold for concern in O2 saturation level is 88%, and given that my wife's concern is for long term health, the fact that her level drops into the 70s for 5-20 minutes at a time a few times a night (while on the machine!) seems like a real cause for concern. Is that correct? Why/why not? Can I expect that showing her sleep doc that data will get him to take it seriously? And if not should we be concerned anyway?
The oximeter consistently shows a marked increase in heart rate during the O2 desaturation periods. Is it accurate to say this reflects the body's reaction of trying to pump more of that O2-poor blood so tissue doesn't suffer? And is the mechanism of that the release of stress hormones (or something) that is exactly the long term contributor to the heart/stroke health problems she fears? I'm really looking for an accurate understanding here.
Side question: Are those desaturation events likely during REM sleep? We don't have an EEG (yet), and so can't be certain of sleep stage, though the timings are plausibly REM. But with overall relaxation/paralysis during REM, might that exacerbate airway restriction and thus contribute to the problem? Are there mechanisms other than REM sleep that might explain the periodic O2 drops (and associated reduced breath volume)?
MACHINE CONCERNS
Starting on the plus side: The machine is clearly working. Her very frequent loud snoring is completely gone with the machine on. (Nice, but that's not what we're concerned about.) The oximeter baseline data also shows it's helping, and that is a good thing.
During the first maybe 20 minutes after going to sleep, the machine records enough events (mostly Hyps) to get her rolling AHI up to 10+ - although her O2 levels stay normal. Many of these look like periodic breathing, and might be just at the ragged edge of the machine's detection thresholds. I feel the machine is over-reporting here and making things look worse than they are to those who only look at AHI. Is that over-reporting interpretation justified?
When the machine was set for max pressure of 20 (it's down to 15 for reasons unclear to us), we never saw pressure above 15 (usually below 13). It looks like the machine isn't even trying to provide enough pressure to avoid the low O2 events. Looking for patterns over many days of data, there are more OA and Hs during the low O2 events, but it's not enough for the machine to figure out she's in trouble. So here it's arguably under-reporting apnea events and ignoring low breathing.
It seems like OA events result in more rapid pressure increases than Hyps. Does anyone with the $800 (!?) oximeter add-on notice that extended low O2 readings make it crank up the pressure even more/faster?
Looking at both breath-by-breath flow data and "minute ventilation" it's clear she's not getting nearly as much air during the low O2 events as during more normal times. So the real question is: Is it realistic to expect this "gold standard" therapy machine to actually keep her O2 levels close to normal?
LEAKS
While the machine reports only infrequent "large leaks", there are smaller leaks as the pressure increases. She breathes almost exclusively thru her nose, and pretty reliably keeps her mouth closed. But when the pressure is above maybe 10, it blows her lips apart for a noticeable leak. Leaks of 20-30 are common at these times, with 40 occasionally. A chin strap helps a little (to our surprise), but adds to the overall discomfort.
She tried the 3M micro pore tape once, with marginal improvement. We have some Somnifix strips on order.
Since the pressure usually gets up to 10-13 during the low O2 events, there is usually some leakage. The breath amplitude shown in the flow data is always lower at those times. One interpretation is that she's just breathing less - airway restriction or something. Another is that the machine's flow reporting accuracy is compromised a little due to the leaks. The question here is whether there's any observed history with the Dreamstation (500X110) of reduced flow report accuracy (actually reduced breath volume) with leaks in the 20-30 l/min range.
A concern if we did get the machine to provide substantially more pressure is that the parted lip leaks would become even more of a problem. A full face mask is the obvious answer to that, but stroke fears or not, there's serious question whether she'd accept that (for more than a few nights of testing). No questions here, just - ugh.
If anybody's still here, thanks for sticking it out. And again, any insights would be greatly appreciated.
Jim
Re: Please help interpret data
Welcome to the forum.
First of all ignore the large leak statistic being reported as 25% of the time in large leak territory.
Copies from my standard speech about Respironics statistics showing large leaks when there aren't that many large leaks or none.
viewtopic/t158560/How-to-post-images-for-review.html
The minimum pressure is not sufficient....needs to be up around 9 or 10 to do a better job of holding the airway open to prevent airway collapses.
She may need more maximum pressure as well. It's topping out at the current max of 15.
Her therapy is way sub optimal....get the AHI reduced significantly and then evaluate the oxygen levels.
First of all ignore the large leak statistic being reported as 25% of the time in large leak territory.
Copies from my standard speech about Respironics statistics showing large leaks when there aren't that many large leaks or none.
Please review this thread for graph formatting....lose the AHI graph and include the leak graph instead.Disregard that warning from SH. Your leaks are NOT excessive.
Instead the statistic reporting the % of time in large leak is based on a ResMed calculation number and that number won't work for your Respironics machine.
Open SH and go to Preferences and then the CPAP tab. SH Defaults to a red line leak threshold of 24 L/min which is a ResMed leak number...won't work with your machine. Your red line threshold number is more like 75...so change the 24 to 75 or just turn off that statistic by removing the check mark.
Large leaks (if you have any) will show up as flags on the Events graph and are a product of the machine.
Those are correct....the SH statistic is just a product of some calculations and isn't from the machine and in your situation with your type of machine...it's wrong.
Ignore it and base your leak evaluation on the presence of large leak flags on the Events graph...the LL on the events graph...that's large leak.
viewtopic/t158560/How-to-post-images-for-review.html
The minimum pressure is not sufficient....needs to be up around 9 or 10 to do a better job of holding the airway open to prevent airway collapses.
She may need more maximum pressure as well. It's topping out at the current max of 15.
Her therapy is way sub optimal....get the AHI reduced significantly and then evaluate the oxygen levels.
_________________
Machine: AirCurve™ 10 VAuto BiLevel Machine with HumidAir™ Heated Humidifier |
Additional Comments: Mask Bleep Eclipse https://bleepsleep.com/the-eclipse/ |
I may have to RISE but I refuse to SHINE.
Re: Please help interpret data
For some people, events will wake them, for others, it will simply disrupt the deep sleep and won't be seen as waking up.jimwelmhurst wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:01 am
OK - now for the questions! My understanding (please correct if wrong!) is that sleep apnea has two primary negative effects: 1) Interfering with sleep quality thru arousals or near-arousals; 2) Stress on the body (suspiciously correlated with heart and stroke problems) due to decreased blood O2 and increased CO2 from reduced breathing volume.
But overall, ANY apnea will likely have bad effects, some sooner, and some stronger.
But her minimum pressure certainly seems certainly too low. I recently changed my minimum from 11 to 12, and reduced events significantly.
I also raised my starting pressure from 5 to 6, and it made things feel much smoother going from awake to asleep, the mask felt
more natural and less intrusive with the small increase.
_________________
Machine: ResMed AirSense™ 10 AutoSet™ CPAP Machine with HumidAir™ Heated Humidifier |
Mask: AirTouch™ F20 Full Face CPAP Mask with Headgear |
Airsense 10 Autoset
AirTouch and AirFit F10 masks

AirTouch and AirFit F10 masks

Re: Please help interpret data
The machine almost certainly isn't doing it's job.
The respironics machines are very slow to respond, so getting the min pressure set right is very important on them, her machine is set at factory defaults, and unless she's a unicorn, that's a bad setting.
The respironics machines are very slow to respond, so getting the min pressure set right is very important on them, her machine is set at factory defaults, and unless she's a unicorn, that's a bad setting.
Get OSCAR
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.
- raisedfist
- Posts: 1176
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 7:21 am
Re: Please help interpret data
Almost all of the AHI is obstructive events. The solution is to raise the min pressure to prevent the bulk of events from occurring in the first place. The PR algorithm is the tortoise, and you don't want the tortoise chasing down events after they occur. It's no wonder with that high of an AHI that she feels awful.
Philips Respironics Trilogy 100
AVAPS-AE Mode
PS Min 6, PS Max 18, EPAP Min 4, EPAP Max 12
AVAPS-AE Mode
PS Min 6, PS Max 18, EPAP Min 4, EPAP Max 12
Re: Please help interpret data
For starters, bump the min pressure up to 10... I'd feel like I was run over by a tank if my AHI was that bad.
Get OSCAR
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.
-
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: Please help interpret data
Jim, your oximetry data shows the classic pattern of apneas. Notice the gradual decline in O2 followed by a more rapid increase in O2 as the heart rate races, at first to try to make up the difference and in the end arousal is needed to restore breathing.
When you are able to get the CPAP adjusted properly, there should be a vast change in the oximetry data.
When you are able to get the CPAP adjusted properly, there should be a vast change in the oximetry data.
_________________
Mask: Brevida™ Nasal Pillow CPAP Mask with Headgear |
Additional Comments: Machine is an AirSense 10 AutoSet For Her with Heated Humidifier. |
SpO2 96+% and holding...
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:27 am
Re: Please help interpret data
Thanks for all the comments and suggestions! I agree with the many suggestions that we can probably reduce AHI by cranking up the starting pressure, and we'll ask the doc to order that. We'll also ask him to set the max back up to 20.
And thanks for the machine leak info, Pugsy. I've updated the reporting threshold.
I'm all for increasing pressure to reduce the AHI, but I'm not completely convinced that's the whole picture. I agree strongly that the machine response is too slow, but here's a pic where prior events had cranked the pressure all the way up. And that second desat event happened completely while the machine was maxed out at 15cm. Yeah, there were some leaks, but not too bad. And yeah, letting the machine go up all the way to 20 might help some more. But I just don't think the machine's doing the job for these desaturation events. Somehow these events are modal. In the second pic she's sleeping along just fine, and then wham! Breathing flow rate drops and gets very raggedy for half an hour. And then it's over. I think those three instances where O2 goes back up rapidly - accompanied by increased breath flow - represent arousals. Is that right? But again, she doesn't wake up, and she doesn't feel like she's not sleeping well. Unlike apparently most PAP users, she reports sleep quality is poorer with the machine.
And OK, maybe she's just become accustomed to poor sleep and thinks it's normal. But we've reduced her AHI by a factor of 3 (30->9) with the machine. Surely if AHI were such a critical metric, she'd HAVE to notice that improvement, wouldn't she?
More on my mistrust of (at least the machine's reporting of) AHI to follow...
And thanks for the machine leak info, Pugsy. I've updated the reporting threshold.
I'm all for increasing pressure to reduce the AHI, but I'm not completely convinced that's the whole picture. I agree strongly that the machine response is too slow, but here's a pic where prior events had cranked the pressure all the way up. And that second desat event happened completely while the machine was maxed out at 15cm. Yeah, there were some leaks, but not too bad. And yeah, letting the machine go up all the way to 20 might help some more. But I just don't think the machine's doing the job for these desaturation events. Somehow these events are modal. In the second pic she's sleeping along just fine, and then wham! Breathing flow rate drops and gets very raggedy for half an hour. And then it's over. I think those three instances where O2 goes back up rapidly - accompanied by increased breath flow - represent arousals. Is that right? But again, she doesn't wake up, and she doesn't feel like she's not sleeping well. Unlike apparently most PAP users, she reports sleep quality is poorer with the machine.
And OK, maybe she's just become accustomed to poor sleep and thinks it's normal. But we've reduced her AHI by a factor of 3 (30->9) with the machine. Surely if AHI were such a critical metric, she'd HAVE to notice that improvement, wouldn't she?
More on my mistrust of (at least the machine's reporting of) AHI to follow...
Re: Please help interpret data
jimwelmhurst wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2019 5:38 ame've reduced her AHI by a factor of 3 (30->9) with the machine. Surely if AHI were such a critical metric, she'd HAVE to notice that improvement, wouldn't she?
No. Right now she's still having enough apnea events to meet the mild OSA category. No where near optimal therapy.
But you are right in one thing....there's a lot more to getting good quality sleep than AHI numbers but you have to start somewhere to have any chance in the worlds of feeling better and getting the AHI down is the first step. Without that...can't expect much.
_________________
Machine: AirCurve™ 10 VAuto BiLevel Machine with HumidAir™ Heated Humidifier |
Additional Comments: Mask Bleep Eclipse https://bleepsleep.com/the-eclipse/ |
I may have to RISE but I refuse to SHINE.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:27 am
Re: Please help interpret data
I guess the question for this post is about interpreting flow data and the accuracy of the APAP Dreamstation's event detection accuracy. Opening admissions of my (poorly founded) bias:
1) Based on my observations of flow and O2 data, I'm concerned the machine sometimes over- and sometimes under-reports OA and H events. I fear the over-reporting artificially inflates the AHI, and the under-reporting fails to get the pressure up fast enough when she needs it.
2) Based on 1) and FOR MY WIFE'S CASE ONLY (NO sleep complaints, fears long term health impact) I question how much AHI really is the best metric of treatment success.
3) I don't want to be the guy with a hammer (oximeter) where everything looks like a nail, or the kid with a shiny toy, but for long term health impact (as opposed to short term sleep quality) it seems like O2 level should be very central.
Picture A: She exhibits "periodic breathing" sometimes (whether flagged by the machine or not.) The machine often/sometimes scores Hs during the low times. (I don't know what that first one was about.) It's hard to consider these very problematic. Do others see this? How do you react?
Picture B: Here, the waxing/waning was large enough for the machine to mark it as periodic (green), but it still scored full OAs. Especially in light of O2 levels being OK, it's hard to take these very seriously. (Admittedly, the machine didn't have the O2 info.)
Picture C: In addition to occasional periodic breathing, she also sometimes just takes a deep breath or 3 for no obvious reason. (Are these called sighs?) Then she often (I project) doesn't feel a need to breathe for a little bit. The machine scored an OA on this one. Yeah, it's pretty flatlined, but I suspect she was just taking a rest, and nothing was wrong. Of course the order is important: A flatline followed by deep breaths certainly looks like a real obstructive event. Do others see this sigh/rest thing? Do you see questionable events if the rest is longish?
I'll skip trying to understand the flow data during her deep desat events. There are lots of very clear OAs, but the breathing is just generally ragged and screwed up. Of more interest is how to fix it.
Thanks for any insights on interpreting those flow patterns!
Jim
1) Based on my observations of flow and O2 data, I'm concerned the machine sometimes over- and sometimes under-reports OA and H events. I fear the over-reporting artificially inflates the AHI, and the under-reporting fails to get the pressure up fast enough when she needs it.
2) Based on 1) and FOR MY WIFE'S CASE ONLY (NO sleep complaints, fears long term health impact) I question how much AHI really is the best metric of treatment success.
3) I don't want to be the guy with a hammer (oximeter) where everything looks like a nail, or the kid with a shiny toy, but for long term health impact (as opposed to short term sleep quality) it seems like O2 level should be very central.
Picture A: She exhibits "periodic breathing" sometimes (whether flagged by the machine or not.) The machine often/sometimes scores Hs during the low times. (I don't know what that first one was about.) It's hard to consider these very problematic. Do others see this? How do you react?
Picture B: Here, the waxing/waning was large enough for the machine to mark it as periodic (green), but it still scored full OAs. Especially in light of O2 levels being OK, it's hard to take these very seriously. (Admittedly, the machine didn't have the O2 info.)
Picture C: In addition to occasional periodic breathing, she also sometimes just takes a deep breath or 3 for no obvious reason. (Are these called sighs?) Then she often (I project) doesn't feel a need to breathe for a little bit. The machine scored an OA on this one. Yeah, it's pretty flatlined, but I suspect she was just taking a rest, and nothing was wrong. Of course the order is important: A flatline followed by deep breaths certainly looks like a real obstructive event. Do others see this sigh/rest thing? Do you see questionable events if the rest is longish?
I'll skip trying to understand the flow data during her deep desat events. There are lots of very clear OAs, but the breathing is just generally ragged and screwed up. Of more interest is how to fix it.

Thanks for any insights on interpreting those flow patterns!
Jim
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 9:36 am
Re: Please help interpret data
The "fix" may not be as simple as changing and one or two things. While AHI isn't a guarantee of really good sleep, it is a report of how you are breathing while trying to sleep. Accurate enough that it is a proper gauge of airway restriction. While on cpap therapy, the 6 AHI shown by you is well outside acceptable limits. So that needs work. Fixing/improving that might just "fix" some other issues as well. You were given good solid advice on how to improve that. You do NOT need a Doctor to do it. But that is up to you. The collective experience here can help, and while I am NOT one of the ones that normally chime in on what needs done, it is obvious even to me that the pressure range is needing changed. I would start there.jimwelmhurst wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 5:28 am
I'll skip trying to understand the flow data during her deep desat events. There are lots of very clear OAs, but the breathing is just generally ragged and screwed up. Of more interest is how to fix it.
Thanks for any insights on interpreting those flow patterns!
Jim
_________________
Machine: ResMed AirSense™ 10 AutoSet™ CPAP Machine with HumidAir™ Heated Humidifier |
Mask: AirFit™ P30i Nasal Pillow CPAP Mask with Headgear Starter Pack |
Min 7 Max 20 (cmH2O)
Re: Please help interpret data
1) Respironics machines aren't very responsive to changing needs. It's critical with those that the minimum pressure be high enough to treat most things that are happening. did you raise her min pressure to 10 and set the max to 20?jimwelmhurst wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 5:28 amI guess the question for this post is about interpreting flow data and the accuracy of the APAP Dreamstation's event detection accuracy. Opening admissions of my (poorly founded) bias:
1) Based on my observations of flow and O2 data, I'm concerned the machine sometimes over- and sometimes under-reports OA and H events. I fear the over-reporting artificially inflates the AHI, and the under-reporting fails to get the pressure up fast enough when she needs it.
2) Based on 1) and FOR MY WIFE'S CASE ONLY (NO sleep complaints, fears long term health impact) I question how much AHI really is the best metric of treatment success.
3) I don't want to be the guy with a hammer (oximeter) where everything looks like a nail, or the kid with a shiny toy, but for long term health impact (as opposed to short term sleep quality) it seems like O2 level should be very central.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzCCgNLya_g
2) AHI isn't necessarily the best measurement for anyone, but it's what we've got.
3) Look! another nail! O2 is usually a non-issue with proper treatment of AHI, Don't discount the long term affects of stress cycles and disrupted sleep caused by fighting for air all night long.
Get OSCAR
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:27 am
Re: Please help interpret data
Thanks for chiming in, realshelby. Agree we should bump pressure up. I've been in the clinician mode (or whatever you call it) and verified I can change pressure, etc, but she doesn't want me to do that, at least not yet. We called the sleep doc and asked to have pressures reset to 9-20, and have an appt in early May. There are also some head problems that increase the challenge.
Thanks for the Resmed marketing link, palerider. If that is to be believed, the Resmed's behavior is a lot closer to what we expected. We got APAP to make it more comfortable for her to fall asleep. I resisted increasing starting pressure at the very beginning - to keep it comfortable and because what we needed was more at the high end. But seeing how the Dreamstation behaves, I completely understand why we need the starting pressure so high.
But if the A10 really does what it says, would that give us best of both, allowing easier starting while still getting the pressure we need when she needs it? And if so, should we be trying to get our doc (or DME - Home Medical Express near Chicago) to swap the Dreamstation for an Airsense 10 Auto For Her? They do carry at least some A10s.
Thanks!
Thanks for the Resmed marketing link, palerider. If that is to be believed, the Resmed's behavior is a lot closer to what we expected. We got APAP to make it more comfortable for her to fall asleep. I resisted increasing starting pressure at the very beginning - to keep it comfortable and because what we needed was more at the high end. But seeing how the Dreamstation behaves, I completely understand why we need the starting pressure so high.
But if the A10 really does what it says, would that give us best of both, allowing easier starting while still getting the pressure we need when she needs it? And if so, should we be trying to get our doc (or DME - Home Medical Express near Chicago) to swap the Dreamstation for an Airsense 10 Auto For Her? They do carry at least some A10s.
Thanks!
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:27 am
Re: Please help interpret data
To restate and clarify my question, given my previously uninformed observation that the Dreamstation seems very slow to respond: Do you folks think the A10 would provide more appropriate treatment in my wife's case? And if so, how do I go about getting the machines swapped? Can I ask the DME, or does the doctor have to prescribe the change?
Thanks for any insights!
Thanks for any insights!
Re: Please help interpret data
My experience with the Respironics auto adjusting algorithm vs the ResMed algorithm.
With Respironics I had to use about 10 cm minimum in auto mode to get essentially the same results as I get with the ResMed auto adjusting algorithm with 7 cm minimum.
You can still get good results with the Respironics auto algorithm but simply have to use a little bit more minimum pressure.
As for how to swap...start by simply asking the DME if they will swap. A lot depends on how the original order from the doctor was written...like did it say something like a generic cpap/apap wording or something that maybe pointed to something only available on a Respironics machine.
If you never ask the answer is always no.
With Respironics I had to use about 10 cm minimum in auto mode to get essentially the same results as I get with the ResMed auto adjusting algorithm with 7 cm minimum.
You can still get good results with the Respironics auto algorithm but simply have to use a little bit more minimum pressure.
As for how to swap...start by simply asking the DME if they will swap. A lot depends on how the original order from the doctor was written...like did it say something like a generic cpap/apap wording or something that maybe pointed to something only available on a Respironics machine.
If you never ask the answer is always no.
_________________
Machine: AirCurve™ 10 VAuto BiLevel Machine with HumidAir™ Heated Humidifier |
Additional Comments: Mask Bleep Eclipse https://bleepsleep.com/the-eclipse/ |
I may have to RISE but I refuse to SHINE.