LOL!! wb, SelfDirected. Rather active message board, isn't it? Yes, it really
is an interesting discussion from different viewpoints.
SelfDirected - accidentally Guested wrote:...he is also concerned that many sleep labs are focused on the economic return to the owners/physicians and not the care of the patient. He likens them to the pain clinics that have become a favorite of the US Attorney’s office. This is not to say all sleep labs are disreputable, but you should be careful. Watch for those that require two studies, one for diagnosis and another for titration, and those who are associated with a particular DME provider. (These were his points to watch . . . so don’t flame me )
I agree absolutely with your neurologist friend except on one point. I really believe if a person is going to have a PSG sleep study, it's better to have two nights of study -- one full diagnostic night, one full titration night. A whole night of actual study in a sleep lab is usually only about 6 hours anyway.
Data gathered for an entire night gives a better picture of what's really going on throughout a person's sleep, imho. And a much better look at the entire sleep architecture. Especially since the duration of REM cycles (when apneas and hypopneas are most likely to happen) normally increases, the longer a person is asleep.
Even more important, imho, the titration shouldn't be rushed. After all is said and done, most people are going to eventually receive a straight cpap machine blowing a single straight pressure at them. And unless there is something very unusual, the pressure the titrating tech comes up with is almost certainly going to be what the doctor prescribes. A full night of careful titration is MUCH better, imho.
I can understand why people, including doctors, might think, "It's just to get extra money that a two night study is done." Personally, I think that's the better way to do conduct a really thorough sleep study -- two full nights.
Most sleep labs probably don't have empty beds. There are waiting lists. They're going to make the same money every night no matter whether it's the same person coming back for a full night titration, or a new person coming in for a first night of data acquisition.
In fact...thinking about the other point your friend raised about some labs being closely associated with a single DME (which I do agree could be a red flag)...split-night studies
might be even
more profitable than separate two night studies for those outfits. Split night studies would mean a faster shuffle of
new patients out the door and over to the DME to be outfitted. Over time, with new people occupying the beds each night, and machine rentals increasing.... hmmm.
SelfDirected wrote:So for those who have a solid foundation for believing they are otherwise healthy, I say do your research and dive in.
I agree.
Hope you sleep well, too!!! I think you will.