I saw your post above and to be honest I couldn't quite decide where I fit.
I bowed out early in your experiments because you were getting advice from so many others that I felt it best if I stepped back and let you follow the others since you didn't seem to have the patience to follow my ideas.
That's why I didn't say much for a long time. Too many cooks in the kitchen kind of thing.
Plus I got the feeling that you didn't trust me..that's okay...My way of doing things and being ultra cautious at least at the beginning isn't always for everyone. I can be aggressive if the need is proven but I never could get what I needed as "proof" that I needed to be more aggressive.
When we first chatted your priority was getting an idea of the label and learning for sure or not if you had OSA or not.
That's what I was trying to do...establish need first and the worry about tweaking for optimal pressures second.
You wanted to establish need and treat at the same time and sometimes it just can't easily be done ESPECIALLY if someone isn't sleeping well because of the potential for SWJ events to cloud the label making.
You are still searching for validation of the label...your machine isn't going to likely give you a nice clear cut label proof that you want. I just haven't seen clear cut black and white proof. I have seen some maybe stuff.
It's not responding enough to make some assumptions that would need to be made. We have to shrug our shoulders and move on and accept the fact that the machine can't give us the label we want.
We have to rely on subjective feelings and that takes time and a lot of experiments. Which you finally got around to accomplishing.
At any rate the proof is in the pudding....you are sleeping better and feeling better now...and that's the primary goal here.
If you really, really need written proof as for need....a sleep study is the only way to maybe get it.
I may have to RISE but I refuse to SHINE.