General Discussion on any topic relating to CPAP and/or Sleep Apnea.
-
Lucyhere
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2015 2:45 pm
Post
by Lucyhere » Thu Jun 15, 2017 5:37 pm
kteague wrote:Goofproof wrote: Truth isn't worth much to Liberals, it interferes making their point fit their needs. Jim
xxyzx wrote: todays liberal is pure evil
Sigh.
I doubt that you really expected a different response.
I appreciate the effort though.
.
Resmed AirSense 10 Autoset for her w/humid air/heated Humidifier
Bleep/P10
-
TedVPAP
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:29 am
Post
by TedVPAP » Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:37 pm
palerider wrote:TedVPAP wrote:Although I have been a member for 6 or 7 years, I do not follow this forum much so I am unfamiliar with everyone. I do not know what xyz... has posted to warrant criticism. As an engineer who loves to analyze the confliction caused by technical disputes versus personalities, I would be happy to examine if someone could point to a model thread.
just start reading:
search.php?author_id=81876&sr=posts
I certainly did not review the complete list but what I saw caused me no concern.
I read the rest of this thread and it seems like the political name calling is what causes most of the rage.
I am very political so nothing I have seen is new to me.
-
palerider
- Posts: 32299
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:43 pm
- Location: Dallas(ish).
Post
by palerider » Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:55 pm
TedVPAP wrote:palerider wrote:TedVPAP wrote:Although I have been a member for 6 or 7 years, I do not follow this forum much so I am unfamiliar with everyone. I do not know what xyz... has posted to warrant criticism. As an engineer who loves to analyze the confliction caused by technical disputes versus personalities, I would be happy to examine if someone could point to a model thread.
just start reading:
search.php?author_id=81876&sr=posts
I certainly did not review the complete list but what I saw caused me no concern.
it causes concern to people that realize that a very large percentage of what he says... about cpap, is
wrong, or at the very best, superfluous.
Get OSCAR
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.
-
Marillion
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2017 12:48 pm
- Location: BC, Canada eh!
Post
by Marillion » Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:29 pm
palerider wrote:TedVPAP wrote:palerider wrote:TedVPAP wrote:Although I have been a member for 6 or 7 years, I do not follow this forum much so I am unfamiliar with everyone. I do not know what xyz... has posted to warrant criticism. As an engineer who loves to analyze the confliction caused by technical disputes versus personalities, I would be happy to examine if someone could point to a model thread.
just start reading:
search.php?author_id=81876&sr=posts
I certainly did not review the complete list but what I saw caused me no concern.
it causes concern to people that realize that a very large percentage of what he says... about cpap, is
wrong, or at the very best, superfluous.
+2 to this.
-
TedVPAP
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:29 am
Post
by TedVPAP » Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:36 pm
palerider wrote:TedVPAP wrote:palerider wrote:TedVPAP wrote:Although I have been a member for 6 or 7 years, I do not follow this forum much so I am unfamiliar with everyone. I do not know what xyz... has posted to warrant criticism. As an engineer who loves to analyze the confliction caused by technical disputes versus personalities, I would be happy to examine if someone could point to a model thread.
just start reading:
search.php?author_id=81876&sr=posts
I certainly did not review the complete list but what I saw caused me no concern.
it causes concern to people that realize that a very large percentage of what he says... about cpap, is
wrong, or at the very best, superfluous.
Is there a post that some one can point to that I should read to prove the point, or do I need to read everything he has ever written before I can come to such an astute realization?
Looks like I am back to my original question.
-
TASmart
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:23 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
Post
by TASmart » Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:41 pm
Try this one:
paptalk.com/CPAP-Sleep-Apnea-Forum.html
All posts reflect my own opinion based on my experience and reading.
Your mileage may vary
Past performance is no guarantee of future results
Consult with your own physician as people very
-
TedVPAP
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:29 am
Post
by TedVPAP » Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:56 pm
TASmart wrote:Try this one:
paptalk.com/CPAP-Sleep-Apnea-Forum.html
Posting a "link" which INTENTIONALLY does not address the specific question which was asked is nothing more than "superfluous". You have scored a negative point. Perhaps I should start a shaming thread on you.
-
palerider
- Posts: 32299
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:43 pm
- Location: Dallas(ish).
Post
by palerider » Fri Jun 16, 2017 12:08 am
TedVPAP wrote:Is there a post that some one can point to that I should read to prove the point, or do I need to read everything he has ever written before I can come to such an astute realization?
Looks like I am back to my original question.
seriously?
being able to see the fallacy offered in the posts of "a certain poster" requires a background and understanding so that you can tell that when the person in question says 'up is left' (for instance) you know that is wrong.
lacking the background and understanding, you have to read the thread, see a post by "a certain poster" and then read the refutations that follow it, so...
NO, there's no single post you can read... TANSTAAFL.
Last edited by
palerider on Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get OSCAR
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.
-
Guest
Post
by Guest » Fri Jun 16, 2017 3:43 am
Who is that used to always say you shouldn't be so thin skinned? Esp. on the internet.
Esp. on this forum, eh.
-
WRX03
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 9:37 am
- Location: Roanoke, Virginia
Post
by WRX03 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 6:11 am
DreamStalker wrote: Neither the GOP nor DEM give a fricken krap about you or me ... figure it out or face the consequences (fast approaching)!
Agree: Grandmother had Republican big-wigs friends, mom with democrat friends. Never felt either group truly cared except for their own agenda that helped themselves or their friends in some fashion. If they did something for the common person was to get reelected.
-
TASmart
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:23 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
Post
by TASmart » Fri Jun 16, 2017 6:59 am
TedVPAP wrote:TASmart wrote:Try this one:
paptalk.com/CPAP-Sleep-Apnea-Forum.html
Posting a "link" which INTENTIONALLY does not address the specific question which was asked is nothing more than "superfluous". You have scored a negative point. Perhaps I should start a shaming thread on you.
Was not intentional, it was supposed to link to the ASV discussion. Feel free to go find it yourself. I can understand if you did not think it answered your question, but a threat? really?
All posts reflect my own opinion based on my experience and reading.
Your mileage may vary
Past performance is no guarantee of future results
Consult with your own physician as people very
-
TedVPAP
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:29 am
Post
by TedVPAP » Fri Jun 16, 2017 6:32 pm
TASmart wrote:TedVPAP wrote:TASmart wrote:Try this one:
paptalk.com/CPAP-Sleep-Apnea-Forum.html
Posting a "link" which INTENTIONALLY does not address the specific question which was asked is nothing more than "superfluous". You have scored a negative point. Perhaps I should start a shaming thread on you.
Was not intentional, it was supposed to link to the ASV discussion. Feel free to go find it yourself. I can understand if you did not think it answered your question, but a threat? really?
My apologies. I meant to add a symbol after the "threat" as it was a joke. The idea of a "shaming thread" makes me laugh.
I will look for the ASV discussion. Thanks
-
Guest
Post
by Guest » Fri Jun 16, 2017 6:37 pm
TASmart wrote: I can understand if you did not think it answered your question, but a threat? really?
A display of the "thin skin" in need of moderation?
-
TASmart
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:23 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
Post
by TASmart » Fri Jun 16, 2017 6:39 pm
Well, there has been at least one shaming thread, that I know of. Apology accepted with relish, glad I bit my finger (so to say) and didn't fire off a snot-o-gram to ya, I really am resolved to not get involved in any more crap slinging, makes me feel worse about myself than I make any poster feel.
All posts reflect my own opinion based on my experience and reading.
Your mileage may vary
Past performance is no guarantee of future results
Consult with your own physician as people very
-
TedVPAP
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:29 am
Post
by TedVPAP » Fri Jun 16, 2017 6:50 pm
palerider wrote:TedVPAP wrote:Is there a post that some one can point to that I should read to prove the point, or do I need to read everything he has ever written before I can come to such an astute realization?
Looks like I am back to my original question.
seriously?
being able to see the fallacy offered in the posts of "a certain poster" requires a background and understanding so that you can tell that when the person in question says 'up is left' (for instance) you know that is wrong.
lacking the background and understanding, you have to read the thread, see a post by "a certain poster" and then read the refutations that follow it, so...
NO, there's no single post you can read... TANSTAFFL.
I understand (although I don't understand your acronym). It can be like pointing to an example that proves once and for all that Trump is either good or evil. I thought there might be an example thread worth examining.