That's being pretty optimistic.......Sir NoddinOff wrote:Boy, I'll sure be glad to see this depressing thread dead and buried. Hopefully tomorrow.
And, if you think the news media will drop it anytime soon........
But......me, too.
Den
.
That's being pretty optimistic.......Sir NoddinOff wrote:Boy, I'll sure be glad to see this depressing thread dead and buried. Hopefully tomorrow.
If the Jewish press is liberal because Chelsea married a jewish man, then it is also conservative because 2 of trumps kids married jews.Julie wrote:Why do you assume the Jewish press is liberal?
The first citations is the only relevant one. That is the email from which the secondary sources derive their conclusions. Again I fail to see where it says that the Clinton Foundation paid $3 million, or any amount, for Chelsea Clinton's wedding. The sentence doesn't even have a verb. I don't know if the author is threatening an investigation, or saying that an investigation is underway, or what. He doesn't say what he means by resources. Did she sit in her foundation office addressing invitations and using a foundation computer? I don't know. But whatever it says, it doesn't say what bryansong claims it said -- that $3 million was converted to private use. This is a remarkable and irresponsible inference to make from this odd, ambiguous email.Wulfman... wrote:Didn't look very hard, did ya?PST wrote:I did google it, before I wrote, and not one of those stories actually quotes an email claiming what you assert.bryansong wrote:This is the last one I'll give you but you could google it if you like.PST wrote:That is a lie. Show your source.bryansong wrote:I heard (wiki-leaks) where the Clinton foundation paid 3 million dollars for Chelsey Clinton's wedding. That's charitable, not honest and ethical but at least it's charitable.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... mails.html
Mostly liberal sites:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/em ... #efmABYACC
***
Yeah, it looks like nobody dropped out, so I guess we'll just have to have an election after all.Sir NoddinOff wrote:Boy, I'll sure be glad to see this depressing thread dead and buried. Hopefully tomorrow.
From your mouth to God's ears. Thank you for your efforts ! I hope they bear sweet fruit tomorrow !PST wrote:Yeah, it looks like nobody dropped out, so I guess we'll just have to have an election after all.Sir NoddinOff wrote:Boy, I'll sure be glad to see this depressing thread dead and buried. Hopefully tomorrow.
We had better have it now. I'm too exhausted to go on. I have spent the last three days in a swing state knocking on doors and getting out the vote. I met hundreds of others doing the same, many of whom, like my wife and I, traveled from states where the outcome is certain to be somewhere they might make a difference. I have to get up at the crack of dawn to poll watch, so this should be my last post ever on the subject. I think one reason Clinton is likely to win is the large number of people willing to work their butts off for no pay and no glory to help get her elected. Maybe I'm wrong, but for all the loud rallies and intemperate tweets, I think the Democrats have poured more grass-roots sweat into this election.

At least, more of the best grass! JimPST wrote:Yeah, it looks like nobody dropped out, so I guess we'll just have to have an election after all.Sir NoddinOff wrote:Boy, I'll sure be glad to see this depressing thread dead and buried. Hopefully tomorrow.
We had better have it now. I'm too exhausted to go on. I have spent the last three days in a swing state knocking on doors and getting out the vote. I met hundreds of others doing the same, many of whom, like my wife and I, traveled from states where the outcome is certain to be somewhere they might make a difference. I have to get up at the crack of dawn to poll watch, so this should be my last post ever on the subject. I think one reason Clinton is likely to win is the large number of people willing to work their butts off for no pay and no glory to help get her elected. Maybe I'm wrong, but for all the loud rallies and intemperate tweets, I think the Democrats have poured more grass-roots sweat into this election.
Sometimes there aren't enough facepalms.fd wrote:crooked hillary runs a clinton cartel and wants nwo sharia law. vote donald j trump dot com

At least until you stop reading, then the crazy resumes, refueled. You would be better served to just pull your heads out of the sand and see the world around you, but for that to be useful, you need a blank slate, not percieved ideas. JimSleepyMcgee wrote:Sometimes there aren't enough facepalms.fd wrote:crooked hillary runs a clinton cartel and wants nwo sharia law. vote donald j trump dot com
Remember folks, reading a newspaper front to back once a week keeps you from contracting a case of 'the crazies'.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What Sand pit has your head been stuck in this year, Trump doesn't do Gracefully, ever. Jimcands wrote:The day has finally come for Mr Trump to drop out. He will telephone Mrs Clinton tonight, concede defeat, and fade gracefully away.