Micro CPAP device

tiredgrl · Post by **tiredgrl** » Mon May 25, 2015 12:12 pm

This looks kind of interesting:

http://www.fundairing.com/journal/2015/ ... pap-device

grayghost4 · Post by **grayghost4** » Mon May 25, 2015 12:14 pm

this was posted yesterday ... and the day before, ..... and Tomorrow, and the next day

it should be made into a stickey at the top

tiredgrl · Post by **tiredgrl** » Mon May 25, 2015 3:01 pm

grayghost4 wrote:this was posted yesterday ... and the day before, ..... and Tomorrow, and the next day

it should be made into a stickey at the top

So you don't have any thoughts other than to point out that you've seen it before? Sheesh....I don't post very often because of the frequent lack of friendliness.

postitnote · Post by **postitnote** » Mon May 25, 2015 3:11 pm

tiredgrl wrote:
grayghost4 wrote:this was posted yesterday ... and the day before, ..... and Tomorrow, and the next day

it should be made into a stickey at the top

So you don't have any thoughts other than to point out that you've seen it before? Sheesh....I don't post very often because of the frequent lack of friendliness.

I think it's interesting aside from the throw away part.

Woody · Post by **Woody** » Mon May 25, 2015 3:25 pm

Seems too good to be true. And did you read down to the part in the article where he is
asking for financial backers. Besides I just don't see how the small battery could provide
enough power for any real airflow for a whole night.

Krelvin · Post by **Krelvin** » Mon May 25, 2015 3:29 pm

tiredgrl wrote:
grayghost4 wrote:this was posted yesterday ... and the day before, ..... and Tomorrow, and the next day

it should be made into a stickey at the top

So you don't have any thoughts other than to point out that you've seen it before?

Actually he was pointing out we already have two other threads about the same vaporware which have many posters to them. Many opinions have been posted, it the other threads.

Don't need three separate threads for the same non-existent product.

LSAT · Post by **LSAT** » Mon May 25, 2015 3:31 pm

tiredgrl wrote:
grayghost4 wrote:this was posted yesterday ... and the day before, ..... and Tomorrow, and the next day

it should be made into a stickey at the top

So you don't have any thoughts other than to point out that you've seen it before? Sheesh....I don't post very often because of the frequent lack of friendliness.

Maybe if you were not so tired, you would have taken 2 minutes to search the previous posts and you could have read all the comments and the people that posted would not have to do it again. Here...I'll do it for you.

viewtopic/t105819/See-this-Airing-Micropap.html

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=105773&st=0&sk=t&sd=a

chunkyfrog · Post by **chunkyfrog** » Mon May 25, 2015 4:59 pm

How many does this make?
Perhaps a sticky needs to be "stuck", just to inform people the product is NOT AVAILABLE,
and is just a concept in search of financing.

Sclark08 · Post by **Sclark08** » Mon May 25, 2015 5:34 pm

I agree with you Tiredgrl

palerider · Post by **palerider** » Mon May 25, 2015 5:34 pm

tiredgrl wrote:
grayghost4 wrote:this was posted yesterday ... and the day before, ..... and Tomorrow, and the next day

it should be made into a stickey at the top

So you don't have any thoughts other than to point out that you've seen it before? Sheesh....I don't post very often because of the frequent lack of friendliness.

maybe you'd get more friendliness if you didn't post something for the forth time, and instead read all the other thoughts that were posted... and then contributed your own.

Sclark08 · Post by **Sclark08** » Mon May 25, 2015 5:35 pm

I luv your avatar by the way

palerider · Post by **palerider** » Mon May 25, 2015 5:35 pm

Krelvin wrote:
tiredgrl wrote:So you don't have any thoughts other than to point out that you've seen it before?
Actually he was pointing out we already have two other threads about the same vaporware which have many posters to them. Many opinions have been posted, it the other threads.

Don't need three separate threads for the same non-existent product.

I think it's four.

chunkyfrog · Post by **chunkyfrog** » Mon May 25, 2015 6:25 pm

Again;
THERE IS NO PRODUCT,
somebody has an idea, and wants money to
GET IT DEVELOPED.
Whether their motives are true or false, we have no idea.

tiredgrl · Post by **tiredgrl** » Mon May 25, 2015 6:33 pm

Wow. There sure are a bunch of rude, snarky people on this forum. Actually, not a bunch. Just a few rude, snarky people who continually like to rip into people. Who cares if this was already posted? Is there a rule somewhere that says one can't post the same topic twice? Or 4 times? Is it hurting anyone? Or are the few of you just nasty people?

chunkyfrog · Post by **chunkyfrog** » Mon May 25, 2015 6:41 pm

Every time this subject comes up, there is a chance someone will think it is endorsed by the forum.
We know nothing about the individuals promoting this idea, but the fact they are no further along
than they are is a source of concern. I do not fault you for your curiosity, but we need to ensure
that no one is being taken advantage of due to the proliferation of this subject.
The lack of additional information about/from them is of further concern.

Micro CPAP device

Micro CPAP device

Re: Micro CPAP device

Re: Micro CPAP device

Re: Micro CPAP device

Re: Micro CPAP device

Re: Micro CPAP device

Re: Micro CPAP device

Re: Micro CPAP device

Re: Micro CPAP device

Re: Micro CPAP device

Re: Micro CPAP device

Re: Micro CPAP device

Re: Micro CPAP device

Re: Micro CPAP device

Re: Micro CPAP device