Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
- Denial Dave
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
I'm disappointed ...... only 5 pages of arguments & sniping at each other??
heck, there is 9 pages of arguments over a sleep center closing.
come on people.... we need more passion!!!
heck, there is 9 pages of arguments over a sleep center closing.
come on people.... we need more passion!!!
_________________
Mask: Mirage Quattro™ Full Face CPAP Mask with Headgear |
Humidifier: S9™ Series H5i™ Heated Humidifier with Climate Control |
Additional Comments: Started at VPAP pressure setting of 20/14.4. I've survived Stage 1 cancer and lost 80+ lbs. Pressure is now 14.5 / 11 |
if you don't know where you are going... any road will take you there.... George Harrison
Re: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
You ain't seen nothing yet.Denial Dave wrote:I'm disappointed ...... only 5 pages of arguments & sniping at each other??
heck, there is 9 pages of arguments over a sleep center closing.
come on people.... we need more passion!!!
_________________
Mask: SleepWeaver Elan™ Soft Cloth Nasal CPAP Mask - Starter Kit |
Humidifier: S9™ Series H5i™ Heated Humidifier with Climate Control |
Additional Comments: Use SleepyHead |
- DreamStalker
- Posts: 7509
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:58 am
- Location: Nowhere & Everywhere At Once
Re: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
Meh.
The other thread has trolls.
So they say ...
The other thread has trolls.
So they say ...
President-pretender, J. Biden, said "the DNC has built the largest voter fraud organization in US history". Too bad they didn’t build the smartest voter fraud organization and got caught.
- ChicagoGranny
- Posts: 15143
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:43 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
When the government provides for you, it makes the rules. It decides what equipment you will get.Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
When you talk about only stripped down CPAP models available, a story 35 years old comes back to me. I took a new immigrant from USSR to the grocery store. He had a problem when I took him down the shampoo aisle. There were probably 50 choices of shampoo and he had no idea. Back home there was only one choice of shampoo - and it usually wasn't in stock.
"It's not the number of breaths we take, it's the number of moments that take our breath away."
Cuando cuentes cuentos, cuenta cuántas cuentos cuentas.
Cuando cuentes cuentos, cuenta cuántas cuentos cuentas.
- The Choker
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:53 pm
Re: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
When the government provides for you, it makes the rules. It decides what equipment you will get.
... or if you get any equipment at all.
T.C.
- The Choker
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:53 pm
Re: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
You remind me of a distraught man watching flames from the kitchen spreading toward the rest of his house. When the fire truck arrives, he will not allow them to use the hoses because the water might damage the ceiling, walls and floor.mcdover wrote:
The doc may "suggest" but with the requirement of an Rx, you still are forced to obtain his "suggestion". With the premise that was posed, you eliminate the expert and leave people with absolutely no guidance except for internet message boards.
I can see it now, no Rx requirement for CPAP, Wal-Mart has them on the shelf next to the adult diapers. George's wife nags him about snoring, so he picks up a CPAP while getting some dog food, bread and milk. He doesn't have any idea what pressure he needs, so he just guesses. George ends up with a stroke, paralysis, and confined to a bed for the rest of his short life because he never consulted a professional because he didn't have to. A little learning is a dangerous thing.....
T.C.
- BlackSpinner
- Posts: 9742
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 5:44 pm
- Location: Edmonton Alberta
- Contact:
Re: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
But now you have insurance companies deciding how much profit they are willing to give up. So what is the difference?ChicagoGranny wrote:When the government provides for you, it makes the rules. It decides what equipment you will get.Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
Most countries in Europe were like that in the 50's due to rationing post WWII necessities . We were shocked back in '58 at all the choice on the shelves in Canada and the ridiculous lack of universal health care.When you talk about only stripped down CPAP models available, a story 35 years old comes back to me. I took a new immigrant from USSR to the grocery store. He had a problem when I took him down the shampoo aisle. There were probably 50 choices of shampoo and he had no idea. Back home there was only one choice of shampoo - and it usually wasn't in stock.
_________________
Machine: PR System One REMStar 60 Series Auto CPAP Machine |
Additional Comments: Quatro mask for colds & flus S8 elite for back up |
71. The lame can ride on horseback, the one-handed drive cattle. The deaf, fight and be useful. To be blind is better than to be burnt on the pyre. No one gets good from a corpse. The Havamal
- chunkyfrog
- Posts: 34545
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:10 pm
- Location: Nowhere special--this year in particular.
Re: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
All this sympathy for DME's simply floors me!
_________________
Mask: AirFit™ P10 For Her Nasal Pillow CPAP Mask with Headgear |
Additional Comments: Airsense 10 Autoset for Her |
Re: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
+1chunkyfrog wrote:All this sympathy for DME's simply floors me!
Every time I read the horror stories about the DMEs, it makes me so glad I bypassed the brick & mortar DME establishments in the beginning and ever since. Other than the initial purchase through CPAP(dot)COM, which my insurance provider reimbursed me for, I've purchased everything out-of-pocket ever since. I'm stocked up for a very long time.......probably longer than I will be alive.
Den
.
- DreamStalker
- Posts: 7509
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:58 am
- Location: Nowhere & Everywhere At Once
Re: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
I used to work as a grocery stocker exactly 35 years ago. The shampoo shelf space was probably only 3 feet wide and 5 shelves high with maybe 5 choices per shelf. Today, I would agree that there are 50 to 60 different choices of shampoo, but 35 years ago, not so much.ChicagoGranny wrote:When the government provides for you, it makes the rules. It decides what equipment you will get.Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
When you talk about only stripped down CPAP models available, a story 35 years old comes back to me. I took a new immigrant from USSR to the grocery store. He had a problem when I took him down the shampoo aisle. There were probably 50 choices of shampoo and he had no idea. Back home there was only one choice of shampoo - and it usually wasn't in stock.
I never been to the USSR but from what I heard/read, I don't think they began having severe post WWII shortages (like no shampoo) until the late 1980's to early 1990's, about 25 years ago. That's just before the USSR collapsed in 1991. So now we know when the USA will collapse ... when the shampoo isle only has one choice -- and it is out of stock.
When you bring up the USSR, an old quote I once read comes to mind.
Kinda reminds me of what I see going on today.The psychologist Carl Jung notes in his observations of collectivism in Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia that most citizens of those nations did not necessarily want the formation of a tyrannical oligarchy, but, they went along with it anyway because they feared for their own comfort and livelihoods.
President-pretender, J. Biden, said "the DNC has built the largest voter fraud organization in US history". Too bad they didn’t build the smartest voter fraud organization and got caught.
- ChicagoGranny
- Posts: 15143
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:43 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
No, the discussion is about Medicare and what they are currently willing/capable of paying for:BlackSpinner wrote:
But now you have insurance companies deciding how much profit they are willing to give up. So what is the difference?
Subject: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for D
"It's not the number of breaths we take, it's the number of moments that take our breath away."
Cuando cuentes cuentos, cuenta cuántas cuentos cuentas.
Cuando cuentes cuentos, cuenta cuántas cuentos cuentas.
- DreamStalker
- Posts: 7509
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:58 am
- Location: Nowhere & Everywhere At Once
Re: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
Actually, the Spinner is right. What's the difference?ChicagoGranny wrote:No, the discussion is about Medicare and what they are willing/capable of paying for:BlackSpinner wrote:
But now you have insurance companies deciding how much profit they are willing to give up. So what is the difference?
Subject: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for D
WELL!!
SPIT IT OUT!!
I can say that cuz she can't hear me ...
President-pretender, J. Biden, said "the DNC has built the largest voter fraud organization in US history". Too bad they didn’t build the smartest voter fraud organization and got caught.
Re: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
If I learned anything with dealing with governmental agencies like Medicare, it's "wait and see". Rumors abound, but it's hard to find out the truth until the changes are fully implemented. As someone pointed out, they won't even announce who has "won" the competitive bidding and what the reimbursement rates will be until July. So until then, we just don't know. Remember this competitive bidding approach is not new. Two years ago it was on the eve of implementation and it was stopped.
I'm not saying that it won't happen or that it won't be bad, but I am saying that until it happens I'm not going to get my knickers in a snit. I've seen too many things like this drag on and on and never have the anticipated impact. Or once they do finally get implemented, they are so fundamentally changed that it's very different from what people panicked about in the first place. And sometimes, the house of cards falls down so quickly that the government is forced to back out.
So I'm going to wait and see what it really turns out to be, before worrying too much about it. (and I have the luxury of doing so, since I'm not on Medicare yet).
I'm not saying that it won't happen or that it won't be bad, but I am saying that until it happens I'm not going to get my knickers in a snit. I've seen too many things like this drag on and on and never have the anticipated impact. Or once they do finally get implemented, they are so fundamentally changed that it's very different from what people panicked about in the first place. And sometimes, the house of cards falls down so quickly that the government is forced to back out.
So I'm going to wait and see what it really turns out to be, before worrying too much about it. (and I have the luxury of doing so, since I'm not on Medicare yet).
_________________
Machine: ResMed AirSense™ 10 AutoSet™ CPAP Machine with HumidAir™ Heated Humidifier |
Mask: DreamWear Nasal CPAP Mask with Headgear |
What you need to know before you meet your DME http://tinyurl.com/2arffqx
Taming the Mirage Quattro http://tinyurl.com/2ft3lh8
Swift FX Fitting Guide http://tinyurl.com/22ur9ts
Don't Pay that Upcharge! http://tinyurl.com/2ck48rm
Taming the Mirage Quattro http://tinyurl.com/2ft3lh8
Swift FX Fitting Guide http://tinyurl.com/22ur9ts
Don't Pay that Upcharge! http://tinyurl.com/2ck48rm
Re: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
http://www.gao.gov/assets/600/590712.pdf
The "competitive bidding program" that Medicare has come up with is bizarre, flawed, and will reduce competition:
http://www.cramton.umd.edu/papers2010-2 ... idding.pdf
Here is how it works. A supplier must submit a composite bid for all items in a category (e.g. 70 or so items in the CPAP category). The bids are non-binding, which is bizarre auction rule number one. The government assigns weights it determines to the bids for each item, in theory according to historical claims data. The government determines the composite price at which point the government-determined supplier capacity will clear the market (note: markets do this for free . . .). Then bizarre auction rule number two kicks in: the government determines the amount it will pay for each individual item based on the median price for each item in all winning bids. So half the companies that win will not be paid what they bid. Meanwhile, consumers have zero say and no incentive to shop around.
The fact of the matter is, given my insurance deductibles, I am paying for everything out of pocket. Lincare now tells me that I do not own my machine, in spite of their telling me when I signed the agreement that I would own the machine. That would not have been possible if markets were operating freely and I could have shopped around and purchased what I wanted. I agree with the earlier comment that these devices should be available OTC, particularly the ones that collect data on their use.
The whole system we have now is a mess, and the more government gets involved, the more of a mess it is going to become.
The flaw in most leftist thinking which produces policies like Obamacare is that markets do not change in response to bad policy. They pass a law like Obamacare and then immediately say something like "See? The world didn't end. People are still getting quality care. Costs didn't explode. Nobody is rationing care." 40 years into Medicare and what are we trying to do? Come up with a way to simulate the competitive market that government intervention destroyed.For the six CBP product categories we analyzed for CBP’s first 6 months of 2011, initial Medicare claim data trends generally indicate a decrease in the number of CBP-covered Medicare beneficiaries who were furnished certain CBP-covered items . . . For the CPAP/RAD product category, the number of distinct CBP-covered beneficiaries who were furnished these items in the nine CBP competitive bidding areas was smaller in each of the first 6 months of 2011 than in the same months of 2010 . . . In contrast, in non-CBP competitive bidding areas, more beneficiaries were served in each of the first 6 months of 2011 compared to the same months in 2010.
The "competitive bidding program" that Medicare has come up with is bizarre, flawed, and will reduce competition:
http://www.cramton.umd.edu/papers2010-2 ... idding.pdf
Here is how it works. A supplier must submit a composite bid for all items in a category (e.g. 70 or so items in the CPAP category). The bids are non-binding, which is bizarre auction rule number one. The government assigns weights it determines to the bids for each item, in theory according to historical claims data. The government determines the composite price at which point the government-determined supplier capacity will clear the market (note: markets do this for free . . .). Then bizarre auction rule number two kicks in: the government determines the amount it will pay for each individual item based on the median price for each item in all winning bids. So half the companies that win will not be paid what they bid. Meanwhile, consumers have zero say and no incentive to shop around.
The fact of the matter is, given my insurance deductibles, I am paying for everything out of pocket. Lincare now tells me that I do not own my machine, in spite of their telling me when I signed the agreement that I would own the machine. That would not have been possible if markets were operating freely and I could have shopped around and purchased what I wanted. I agree with the earlier comment that these devices should be available OTC, particularly the ones that collect data on their use.
The whole system we have now is a mess, and the more government gets involved, the more of a mess it is going to become.
_________________
Mask: SleepWeaver Elan™ Soft Cloth Nasal CPAP Mask - Starter Kit |
Humidifier: S9™ Series H5i™ Heated Humidifier with Climate Control |
- NiceDMEDude
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:31 am
- Location: Indiana
Re: Medicare CPAP reimbursement cut 47% for DMEs
Hello all,
Haven't posted in some time (I lurk, but only post if I feel I can add to a discussion).
Quite a bit of confusion abounds regarding the SPA and competitive bidding in general. I submitted a bid for the Louisville CBA. I only bid in the PAP and oxygen categories, as these are the only segments of DME which I provide.
As of this writing, I am unaware of any local DME/HME who received an email stating they submitted a winning bid. Likely, many companies who do not have a physical presence in the area submitted winning bids.
I am certainly not looking to come on this board and spout off or berate anyone for their beliefs or opinions. I can simply state my views and the stance of my company.
As was pointed out by several contributors to this thread, it will not be possible to provide the DS560HS (our standard unit which every patient receives), or DS760HS (our standard machine for BiLevel) at the SPA reimbursement level.
To be honest, I do not care. I am so worn out from fighting insurance companies, constantly attempting to please everyone from clients to physicians, beating up my manufacturer reps for ever-lower pricing, etc. that I am giving up. Should I receive a bid, I will decline to participate. I will not compromise the ability to provide quality service to simply maintain a losing business model. With 7 of my 12 employees being credentialed respiratory therapists (2 of whom use PAP themselves), these reimbursement amounts are unrealistic. We offer a very high level of service, as we specialize only in sleep-related equipment. Again, this is my stance; other providers may find a way to make it feasible.
However, I am the single largest customer for each of my reps from the big three. My prices from PR, F&P, and ResMed are as good as it gets. If I can't do it, I do not believe that my local competitors will either.
Fortunately for me, I also maintain a thriving website. The website has been my focus for the last couple of years, and going forward I will shift even more resources to the online business model.
Many of you on here are customers of mine, and I sincerely appreciate your business (even if you have no clue who I am).
HME is a dying business, and will soon be unrecognizable. Likely it will be some combination of scenarios already discussed in this thread. Mail order, online, local pharmacy, direct from manufacturer, I don't know.
Apologies for the rambling, but when I saw Karen's post I felt compelled to read the thread and respond.
Best to all of you in your treatment, and thanks for being educated on the healthcare system and your therapy.
Haven't posted in some time (I lurk, but only post if I feel I can add to a discussion).
Quite a bit of confusion abounds regarding the SPA and competitive bidding in general. I submitted a bid for the Louisville CBA. I only bid in the PAP and oxygen categories, as these are the only segments of DME which I provide.
As of this writing, I am unaware of any local DME/HME who received an email stating they submitted a winning bid. Likely, many companies who do not have a physical presence in the area submitted winning bids.
I am certainly not looking to come on this board and spout off or berate anyone for their beliefs or opinions. I can simply state my views and the stance of my company.
As was pointed out by several contributors to this thread, it will not be possible to provide the DS560HS (our standard unit which every patient receives), or DS760HS (our standard machine for BiLevel) at the SPA reimbursement level.
To be honest, I do not care. I am so worn out from fighting insurance companies, constantly attempting to please everyone from clients to physicians, beating up my manufacturer reps for ever-lower pricing, etc. that I am giving up. Should I receive a bid, I will decline to participate. I will not compromise the ability to provide quality service to simply maintain a losing business model. With 7 of my 12 employees being credentialed respiratory therapists (2 of whom use PAP themselves), these reimbursement amounts are unrealistic. We offer a very high level of service, as we specialize only in sleep-related equipment. Again, this is my stance; other providers may find a way to make it feasible.
However, I am the single largest customer for each of my reps from the big three. My prices from PR, F&P, and ResMed are as good as it gets. If I can't do it, I do not believe that my local competitors will either.
Fortunately for me, I also maintain a thriving website. The website has been my focus for the last couple of years, and going forward I will shift even more resources to the online business model.
Many of you on here are customers of mine, and I sincerely appreciate your business (even if you have no clue who I am).
HME is a dying business, and will soon be unrecognizable. Likely it will be some combination of scenarios already discussed in this thread. Mail order, online, local pharmacy, direct from manufacturer, I don't know.
Apologies for the rambling, but when I saw Karen's post I felt compelled to read the thread and respond.
Best to all of you in your treatment, and thanks for being educated on the healthcare system and your therapy.