Slinky wrote: Goshes, jnk. You don't happen to have any strong feelings about this new PAP, do you???
Who? Me? Opinions? That would be above my pay grade.
Well, as long as it has data and as long as it can run in CPAP mode at a pressure a patient or clinician chooses (which, for this machine, are unknowns to me at this point), I would think it would belong on any "recommended" list, patient to patient.Slinky wrote: Actually, I agree w/you but .... had to share the info w/the forum so the newbies could see the reaction and opinions of the "pros" before they buy or before their 30 days window has passed.
On the other hand, if it hides data from the patient or is limited in the modes it can run in, those would be deal-breakers for me.
Seems to me the concept may be confusing to patients and docs--kinda like that mode, (what was it called, something like "split-night setting"?) that some Respironics machines had and that some machines would accidentally be put into and handed to patients in. Few understood what it was for and why it was there, if I remember correctly.
Once you start blurring the lines between what is an auto and what is not, there is a potential for a lot of confusion. So I think marketing will be difficult for the concept. Hands-on people usually want to be hands-on the whole way; auto people usually like full-time auto. Creating a hybrid part-auto-part-cpap mode may be useful in some situations, but may suffer from the El-Camino curse of promising both a truck and a car but actually delivering a product that is not quite either one. The people who want that may love it, but it may be a niche product that few others every really understand, or want to understand.
Then again, hey, this AutoIQ may be the next big thing. I've been wrong before. And frankly, I'd enjoy being wrong about this one.
Seems to me the Philips Respironics people need a hit of some sort. That ResMed monster company needs some good competition. And ResMed needs to be spanked over that non-data Auto. THAT sure muddied the waters compared to the days when we could simply tell someone to get an auto in order for them to be sure to have data. Again, I see it could have a purpose in some very limited situations. It is just confusing.Slinky wrote:Maybe PR developed this PR S1 Pro AutoIQ to compete w/the Resmed S9 Escape Auto, ya think????
Anyway, I am panning the marketing more than the concept. The product needs a name that clarifies what it does. When all autos (as far as I know) can already be manually put into CPAP mode once a 95% or 90% pressure has been determined by a patient or clinician, it just seems lazy for a machine to have to be trusted to do that automatically, if that's all the AutoIQ does.
Enough of my opinions. I'll shut up to read the others. Hopefully they will change my mind. I like having my mind changed. I am an optimistic cynic.




