You're entirely correct. I guess I just don't think the situation is as complicated as you do.drbandage wrote:Blarg, no fair, you finished posting your reply a mere six minutes after I finished posting. So, I suspect it didn't get a thorough reading from you.
Yup. Some people do say that. Ok, ok, I'm not trying to cut down your effort here, but again, I just don't see this as a very complicated situation.drbandage wrote:Some say you should read a letter as carefully as it is written.
That's actually what I was trying to say in a delicate way. Volumes of not much.drbandage wrote:It may speak volumes to the current situation, but what does it actually say? Volumes of what?
Well, I guess I can only parrot others here. You can stay here and NHE can say whatever he wants, but how you feel about it is entirely up to you. All I'm trying to say here is that it's an internet forum, we're bound to disagree, and we're also bound to jump down each others' throats from time to time (or all the time, see me and sleepinginseattle).drbandage wrote:The fact that I spent the time needed to compile this post speaks to my desire to be able to stay here without feeling like the pinata of NHE's party.
Of course it's simplistic. It's actually a fairly simple situation. You feel attacked, and rightfully so. So now what? I'm sure he feels the same way.drbandage wrote:Equating the time needed to compile the post with the actual content of the post, and the need to provide a carefully considered response to it, seems a bit simplistic, but that's just my opinion.
UN communication or communication?drbandage wrote:Blarg, have you seen what passes for communication?
Sometimes watching two people fight is one of the best ways that others can size up an argument. Sure, the straight up personal attacks don't help much, but they discredit the other side. So, if it were me, I would attempt to ignore them and address the ideas. If that doesn't work for you, then maybe you should simply ignore the post in its entirety. Final word doesn't mean winner here, and as much as I hate to admit it to myself sometimes, people around here really can think for themselves. Not every single piece of info needs to be addressed.
You have evidence that he's not seeking dialogue. I don't understand why I would need to read all of it to be swayed to your opinion. I am swayed to your opinion. I don't see why I need to read all of that above except so you can say, "See how nasty NHE is? I told you so." I'm not interested in personal attacks.drbandage wrote:It is incendiary taunts that arrive without an genuine attempt to communicate. I have ample enough evidence that dialogue is not what NHE is seeking when he posts to my threads. I'd ask you to read carefully what I have written, and judge by the content of it, not by the quantity of time required to compose it.
Well that's really easy then. Don't make a post asking for peoples' opinions when you already know the answer. If you don't want to respond to the guy, then all you have to do is stop responding to the guy.drbandage wrote:So, I'd have to dispute the notion that further contact is in the best interest of this board. It certainly is not in mine.
Oh, I don't think this is much of an experiment. Emotional flaring maybe, but yeah. I guess I'd question the reason you made the post in the first place.drbandage wrote:It might make for an interesting psychological experiment as you say you enjoy, but I am not here to be a lab rat. But, we see.
My mom always said "Don't ask a question you don't want to hear the answer to." It's really really easy. You just stop talking to him and the best way to start that, unfortunately, is not compiling a tome of his sins against you and posting it in a new thread.drbandage wrote:I wish you had voted yes, because, as I said, the only acceptable option for me is to move on.
I agree entirely. I'm not forcing you to do anything. You asked my opinion and I gave it. If you really feel you'd cross the street to avoid talking to NHE, then there's not much of a point in running a poll about it.drbandage wrote:I'm not blackmailing anybody, but then again, nobody should be forced to "communicate" with anybody else. There are some folks that may annoy you enough that you would cross the street to avoid having to talk to them.
I'm still wondering why you asked then, if not to be able to bring up NHE's sins. Frankly, I have the highest respect for you (still do) and your posts. What NHE says stands on its own, and believe me, if you ignore him, I won't be offended in the slightest.drbandage wrote:In this case, I have no further interest in NHE and his posts, and I only wish the feeling were mutual. It is a decision that I have made in my own best interests, and I do not consider it to be worth revisiting.
Cool. It's really simple then. We've been judging for ourselves all along, and I hope it shows.drbandage wrote:I've no interest in "sitting in a corner" so I can reconsider a situation that I have spent so long considering. Others can judge for themselves, and that's all that I ask.
Yup. It can. Since it's obviously personal to you, then I'm just confused why you asked.drbandage wrote:Then again, it can be easy to write things off as "not personal" when indeed that would seem to be their intent. Sometimes a cigar really is just a cigar, to paraphrase Sigmund.
Perhaps this is more a psychological experiment that you're putting yourself through than you realize.
And I'm not mad at you in the slightest, nor am I offended, or anything of the sort. Nor have I lost any respect for you at all. I'm just writing directly in the hopes that you'll see my point.