Re: Anyone tried the CMS-P yet? Or bought from Contec?
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 12:57 pm
Do any other of the inexpensive finger pulse-Ox devices allow easy downloading to a PC the next day (as opposed to real-time data collection on PC) ?
A Forum For All Things CPAP
https://www.cpaptalk.com/
There are a number of other Contec "CMS" pluse oximeters that will do just that. Do a search for CMS threads here.liv2kite wrote:Do any other of the inexpensive finger pulse-Ox devices allow easy downloading to a PC the next day (as opposed to real-time data collection on PC) ?
Check out, for example, semedicalsupply.com. Any pulse-ox that is listed as having monitoring software will do what you mention.liv2kite wrote:Do any other of the inexpensive finger pulse-Ox devices allow easy downloading to a PC the next day (as opposed to real-time data collection on PC) ?
Yeah but I wonder how many of those problems were related to Windows Vista?dmstangu wrote:That's interesting. They show a link on their website to BBB which opens up a totally different echostore.com. This one is, ofkors, satisfactory...jnk wrote:That would be the purpose of the software, I assume. The site says it has both "realtime display software" and "Sleep Study Software and Report System." To me that implies overnight and recording, but it isn't directly stated, (unless it's in Chinese ). Every other Contec pulse oximeter that comes with software can record data. But that is a good question, guest. That's exactly the kind of thing I'm wondering about.Guest wrote:Did I miss where it said recording? or overnite?
Hawthorne, echostore.com has an unsatifactory rating with the bbb: http://chicago.bbb.org/WWWRoot/Report.a ... m=88012207
http://chicago.bbb.org/WWWRoot/Report.a ... m=88022883
Which one is the right one now?
Are you sure you didn't sit your S8 on top of it?Slinky wrote:I ran my laptop overnite 4-5 different nites and burned up the power supply. I now have a laptop cooler that I make sure to use.
I bought a used MD300A from semedicalsupply for $149 shipped when they had a Web special. I like it, and it was a good price, but it only samples and records pulse and O2 once every minute and can only show the info from its screen. I think I would get a lot better info with that CMS software. I shoulda waited and saved up. My momma never said I was bright.Snoredog wrote: . . . other pulse oximeters out there, nearly all of them grossly overpriced . . .




Hi late4work, Thank you for providing this info, and adding a link to here from the other cms-60D product review thread. Without that msg in the other thread, I would have missed this thread.late4work wrote:I've had my CMS-P for about a week now. If you are looking for a low cost oximeter, this might appeal to you...
The storage container is kind of interesting. It's in a metal can with a window on top. The software CD is actually in the can also - it's one of the mini CD's that are somewhat rare, but that all CD drives seem to be able to read...
Hi feeling_better - what you are missing is that there IS something missingfeeling_better wrote:Hi late4work, Thank you for providing this info, and adding a link to here from the other cms-60D product review thread. Without that msg in the other thread, I would have missed this thread.late4work wrote:I've had my CMS-P for about a week now. If you are looking for a low cost oximeter, this might appeal to you...
The storage container is kind of interesting. It's in a metal can with a window on top. The software CD is actually in the can also - it's one of the mini CD's that are somewhat rare, but that all CD drives seem to be able to read...
Am I missing something here ? You have an image of the packing can, and the finger probe, no image of the 'meter proper'. Is the shown finger probe the actual meter? If not, could you please include an image of the meter? Thank you.
The LED should be at the center of the nail bed, those things are designed to shine down through the nail bed.I'm going to try flipping the finger sensor over so that the LEDs are on the bottom of my finger instead of the top. I'm thinking that the bottom of my finger might be less sensitive to the IR than the spot right behind my finger nail.