Re: Subject: Fragmented Sleep, FLs, Suspected UARS, REM Related. 5 Months of Optimization + EERS
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2020 12:23 am
It's remarkable. I can nearly echo Miss Emerita as is reflected below in the elisions or braces-enclosed, bolded underlined and italicized fonts showing my parallels applied to places in her post.
Her contrasting FL graphs from the Autoset and VAuto show the same improvement I experienced with only that 1.0 cm of added PS, beyond what the Airsense Autoset could do with EPR 3. It was the similarity of her graphs to mine showing the change that stopped me cold to make this comment. Only 1.0 cm of pressure change, if in fact that is the only difference between the machines, can make a huge difference in FL. I still have a lot of sub-detectable (I'll say fl rather than FL) that shows up in small deformations of the FR curve at peak inhalation flow. Sleep is vastly improved, but I am still searching for ways to, er, "unflatten the curve[s]", particularly those (zoomed 1-minute view) peaks with two ears--that almost always trigger a FL for him--and those undetected flow resistances just below that two-eared level of interference.
AGAIN, MISS EMERITA'S ACTUAL QUOTE HAS BEEN MODIFIED BY ASB IN WHAT FOLLOWS, BETWEEN **** MARKS, TO REFLECT HIS VERY SIMILAR EXPERIENCE OF THE VAUTO'S PS BENEFITS.
***For what it's worth, I bought a lightly used ResMed VAuto Aircurve {$300 for very low hours}. . . . I knew my AHI with the Airsense 10 Autoset was way too low to get a prescription for a bilevel machine or to get insurance coverage. With pressure support of {[4.0]}, I've seen a major change in flow limitations. . . .
.
I definitely feel more rested with the drop in FLs . . . . See attachments for before/after graphs.
Like you, I have cardioballistic artifacts, but they {[are more prominent, side sleeper that I am, when sleeping on my right side than--though still present--when on my left side} The VAuto interprets the fluctuations around the zero line correctly; the Autoset didn't miscount my respiration rate . . . .
Hope this {[near ditto]} is of some help!
[/quote] *****
Her contrasting FL graphs from the Autoset and VAuto show the same improvement I experienced with only that 1.0 cm of added PS, beyond what the Airsense Autoset could do with EPR 3. It was the similarity of her graphs to mine showing the change that stopped me cold to make this comment. Only 1.0 cm of pressure change, if in fact that is the only difference between the machines, can make a huge difference in FL. I still have a lot of sub-detectable (I'll say fl rather than FL) that shows up in small deformations of the FR curve at peak inhalation flow. Sleep is vastly improved, but I am still searching for ways to, er, "unflatten the curve[s]", particularly those (zoomed 1-minute view) peaks with two ears--that almost always trigger a FL for him--and those undetected flow resistances just below that two-eared level of interference.
AGAIN, MISS EMERITA'S ACTUAL QUOTE HAS BEEN MODIFIED BY ASB IN WHAT FOLLOWS, BETWEEN **** MARKS, TO REFLECT HIS VERY SIMILAR EXPERIENCE OF THE VAUTO'S PS BENEFITS.
***For what it's worth, I bought a lightly used ResMed VAuto Aircurve {$300 for very low hours}. . . . I knew my AHI with the Airsense 10 Autoset was way too low to get a prescription for a bilevel machine or to get insurance coverage. With pressure support of {[4.0]}, I've seen a major change in flow limitations. . . .
.
I definitely feel more rested with the drop in FLs . . . . See attachments for before/after graphs.
Like you, I have cardioballistic artifacts, but they {[are more prominent, side sleeper that I am, when sleeping on my right side than--though still present--when on my left side} The VAuto interprets the fluctuations around the zero line correctly; the Autoset didn't miscount my respiration rate . . . .
Hope this {[near ditto]} is of some help!
[/quote] *****