palerider wrote:I agree that the numbers are usually close (are they always less?) than the actual duration of the events.
I found it not always to be the case that the number in parentheses was less than actual second count (when I tried the manual counting of longer events).
I didn't have a lot of "longer" events to manually evaluate...those 30 and above events and most were hyponeas in my case and it's difficult to see the beginning and ending of hyponeas when zoomed in at the level needed to count the seconds.
Some of them appeared to be spot on accurate....especially the longer duration events.
So while the short duration events were usually less (by 2 or 3 seconds) the longer duration events seemed to be more spot on in terms of accuracy as best as I could tell. I never found one that was more than 5 seconds difference (plus or minus) though...and I don't think I found many that were more than 4 seconds off and that was likely more from my own inability to clearly define the ending and beginning. It seemed to me that the higher the number in parentheses the more likely it was to be more spot on in terms of manually counting.
Pretty much every single digit (in parentheses) event was at most 12 seconds when manually counting and most often barely made 10 seconds.
You know that Encore will actually report "time in apnea" so it has to have some sort of event duration to calculate from...and I suspect (but can't prove) that it is related to the "markers" that Mark has to use as the number in parentheses from the Respironics machines. There's a reason for those markers to even be there and I think it relates to the "time in apnea" thing.
It's not official and obviously with single digit markers it isn't exact but I think it is really close and I think that it gets closer the longer the event lasts.
I may have to RISE but I refuse to SHINE.