1 in 10 of you were misdiagnosed in your sleep study

General Discussion on any topic relating to CPAP and/or Sleep Apnea.
meister
Posts: 399
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 11:15 am

1 in 10 of you were misdiagnosed in your sleep study

Post by meister » Thu May 05, 2005 1:37 pm

http://www.sleep-solutions.com/clinical ... of_SDB.pdf

It is well known that sleep recorded in the
laboratory is confounded by the “first night effect”
which is characterized by lower sleep efficiency, increased
wakefulness, reduction in rapid eye movement
sleep (REM), and longer latencies to sleep. Evidence
suggests this phenomenon is not seen in the home.

User avatar
Nitro Dan
Posts: 281
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 10:52 am
Location: Or-e-gun
Contact:

Post by Nitro Dan » Fri May 06, 2005 9:28 am

Glad I was one of the 9!
Over 20 years in treatment...
Humidified REMstar Plus at 18 cm
Mirage Swift Nasal Pillow System....A Winner!

User avatar
Severeena
Posts: 821
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: 907 Main Street, Union Grove, WI 53182
Contact:

Post by Severeena » Fri May 06, 2005 11:39 am

My first two Sleep Lab tests that were done in Ohio pointed to Sleep Apnea but the doctor wanted and did treat me for Narcolepsy.

My intended read my chart and all the findings and he asked why I wasn't on a CPAP machine.

My new doctor read this same report and he shook his head. This is when my sleep study was done and they discovered that I really had sleep apnea. So now I am on the S7 Lightweight.

My intended said that my former doctors were all screwed up.

_________________
Mask
Sharon
Trust in the Lord with all thine heart and lean not until thine own understanding ..... Proverbs 3:5-


Not all Masks work for everyone. Each Person is Different.

IWannaSleep
Posts: 245
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 1:34 am
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by IWannaSleep » Fri May 06, 2005 1:29 pm

Nitro Dan wrote:Glad I was one of the 9!


High Five Dan!!!
9 cm h2o

Snoozy Q
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: suburbs of Seattle

Post by Snoozy Q » Sun May 08, 2005 6:47 pm

My sleep doc said not to pay too much attention to the "sleep architecture" data in my sleep study ( how much spent time in various stages, sleep latentcy, etc) because a night of sleeping in a lab is not your "normal" night's sleep. Still, he thought the OSA-related data was still meaningful enough to make a diagnosis.

I found it reassuring that he took the weirdness of sleeping in a lab into account when intepreting results.

SleepyGuy
Posts: 193
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:06 pm

Post by SleepyGuy » Sun May 08, 2005 11:26 pm

I suspect that mine was not quite accurate because I didn't sleep long enough. My oxygen saturation never went below 85%, but I know that I usually only start dreaming later in the night. I've read that apneas are more common at this time. I know that if I wake up after having dreamed for a while I'm groggier than if I wake up earlier. My guess is that my oxygen saturation tends to get much lower later in the night and the test didn't pick this up.